+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Daytime Angels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=130)
+---- Thread: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat (/showthread.php?tid=16334)
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - schmoo - 28-01-2010 13:14
The channel has been going for a week or two now.. and i don't expect things to change straight away (i'm not going to moan like thestrange1 before me), but one thing i believe does need attention pretty sharpish is the fact that the girl cannot be seen properly..
This is due to the screen caption and the fact the camera is (zoomed in)too close, so half the girl is always covered up by it and/or that the camera is pointed too high (resulting in the girl appearing too low) therefore also being hidden by the screen caption.
It's really annoying when we are watching and/or calling wanting to see (all of) the girl concerned (legs and knicker flashes primarily for me!) But we can't.
Some constructive "criticism" for you. I hope you take on board.
Oh.. and i'm still waiting for the office set!
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - Archangel - 28-01-2010 13:23
captions will be changed very soon (when new numbers come in) schmoo, office set will arrive.....thanks
(28-01-2010 13:14 )schmoo Wrote: The channel has been going for a week or two now.. and i don't expect things to change straight away (i'm not going to moan like thestrange1 before me), but one thing i believe does need attention pretty sharpish is the fact that the girl cannot be seen properly..
This is due to the screen caption and the fact the camera is (zoomed in)too close, so half the girl is always covered up by it and/or that the camera is pointed too high (resulting in the girl appearing too low) therefore also being hidden by the screen caption.
It's really annoying when we are watching and/or calling wanting to see (all of) the girl concerned (legs and knicker flashes primarily for me!) But we can't.
Some constructive "criticism" for you. I hope you take on board.
Oh.. and i'm still waiting for the office set!
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - Ducky - 28-01-2010 13:41
I have noticed with this channel that the babes seem to have nice fun little chats inbetween calls with the staff who are off camera.
It's nice to see that they're not just stuck there & Holly looks like she's really enjoying not just her phone conversations, but the time inbetween too
I'm liking this channel so far, well done Angels TV
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - SashasMan - 28-01-2010 17:41
I have to say I really like the set today that hollys on nice colours violet and purple. Oh that Hollys so cheeky LOL
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - thestrange1 - 28-01-2010 17:53
This channel still looks poor. The set is cheap and the graphics are aswell.
The camera is always really close and it never moves.
The music is the same as hotel voyeur.
Just so boring and samey. Everything i've said here applies to the night show aswell.
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - Chilly - 28-01-2010 18:03
(28-01-2010 17:53 )thestrange1 Wrote: This channel still looks poor. The set is cheap and the graphics are aswell.
The camera is always really close and it never moves.
The music is the same as hotel voyeur.
Just so boring and samey. Everything i've said here applies to the night show aswell.
I know how you feel, I mean, I feel the same way when I read your posts.
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - thestrange1 - 28-01-2010 18:14
(28-01-2010 18:03 )Chilly Wrote:(28-01-2010 17:53 )thestrange1 Wrote: This channel still looks poor. The set is cheap and the graphics are aswell.
The camera is always really close and it never moves.
The music is the same as hotel voyeur.
Just so boring and samey. Everything i've said here applies to the night show aswell.
I know how you feel, I mean, I feel the same way when I read your posts.
Repeating myself is the only way of trying to get through to them because they only seem to respond to praise.
The channel has been broadcasting for 2 weeks and still looks and is awful. They have some great babes but its so tiresome to watch as they are wasted on a channel that looks like its being filmed with a phone camera in someones shed.
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - tsurugi - 28-01-2010 18:29
Not sure how you can hate a channel so much. Looks ok to me hasn't massively grabbed me but its not so bad is it? Looks much better than 960 in my opinion.
Any chance of getting some alternative looking girls on the show? Holly D, Havana Sin or even a borderline alt/punk girl like Shay Hendrix
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - schmoo - 28-01-2010 18:35
tsurugi.. it's Angels TV! Not sure if a punk looking girl could pass as a (traditional looking) angel..!?
RE: Daytime Angels - discussion & chat - skully - 28-01-2010 18:41
thestrange1,
The people in charge of channels appreciate constructive criticism, they want to give us the best quality show possible, so our feedback (good and bad) is helpful to them. But...you need to be more patient and stop being so negative, some of the established (big money) channels still have problems, the other newish channels are still finding their feet. I'm sure Archangel is taking note of things and will have everything running the way she wants soon enough.
But it takes time!