+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: RIP Bang Babes : Gone Bust... (/showthread.php?tid=26854)
RE: RIP Bang Babes - Scotsman - 26-11-2010 16:06
(26-11-2010 16:05 )bigguy01 Wrote: yet in soaps they show violence, drug abuse, rape, sex from 7pm to 8pm daily and ofcom does nothing
Again, context.
RE: RIP Bang Babes - bigguy01 - 26-11-2010 16:14
well peoples imagination can create alot more disturbing. you dont see the cops hear being cut off in reseviour dogs you hear his screams but mind creates the imagery. the same applies to soaps but eastenders showed phil taking crack.
sky boxes should have the parent controls on max and then its upto the user to decide said channels be accessable.
RE: RIP Bang Babes - RRROGER - 26-11-2010 16:14
Playboy TV are the answer to all the questions, earlier this year Bang were broadcasting on SKY901/902/912/915/916/948/959 on daytime shows, mostly Playboy channels, the Playboy encrypted channels reverting back to Playboy after 10pm as SKY915 is doing at the moment; in simple terms Bang have lost their broadcasting license, but presumably can supply programming for Playboy to broadcast for them, as is happening on SKY902/915 at the moment.
There's obviously a long running agreement in effect between Bang & Playboy, so maybe like the channel shuffling between them a few months ago, something similar can be arranged to salvage something from this mess.
RE: RIP Bang Babes - vila - 26-11-2010 16:16
(26-11-2010 16:06 )Scotsman Wrote:(26-11-2010 16:05 )bigguy01 Wrote: yet in soaps they show violence, drug abuse, rape, sex from 7pm to 8pm daily and ofcom does nothing
Again, context.
Yeah, context.
How could anyone in their right mind seriously think that sexually explicit behaviour could be in context on a SEX chat channel???
Some people . . . . .
RE: RIP Bang Babes - MeTarzan - 26-11-2010 16:17
It's gotta be a sick world when Dannii Harwood's pussy breaks the rules, but this doesn't...
![[Image: 3e4525108285803.jpg]](http://thumbnails32.imagebam.com/10829/3e4525108285803.jpg)
RE: RIP Bang Babes - polo249 - 26-11-2010 16:17
soaps show drugs,rape & so on because its ment to show real life right...so yes thats context. now bangbabes/phone channels should be able to show nudity/stronger material because its an adult show right...so why is that not in context?
RE: RIP Bang Babes - burnerb - 26-11-2010 16:18
Why cant they continue broadcasting only as a web-stream???
RE: RIP Bang Babes - GaylordfuckoffTWO - 26-11-2010 16:19
ADDDDDDEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE..........
RE: RIP Bang Babes - bigguy01 - 26-11-2010 16:23
(26-11-2010 16:17 )polo249 Wrote: soaps show drugs,rape & so on because its ment to show real life right...so yes thats context. now bangbabes/phone channels should be able to show nudity/stronger material because its an adult show right...so why is that not in context?
cause ofcom think such things are the devil (my mama says, waterboy).
RE: RIP Bang Babes - ynot2005 - 26-11-2010 16:23
(26-11-2010 12:58 )vostok 1 Wrote: I hope the forum will be able to see this in its full perspective and not just in the narrow view that this is "all Ofcoms fault".
Take a look back at Bangs responses to Ofcom: no comment, failure to supply recordings, untruths about suspending two presenters etc. If they had of offered a structured, cohesive response then things could have played out differently.
very true vostok!