+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Cams (/forumdisplay.php?fid=374)
+--- Forum: Former Webcam Sites (/forumdisplay.php?fid=300)
+---- Forum: BabeX TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=371)
+----- Forum: Bex Shiner (/forumdisplay.php?fid=309)
+----- Thread: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=64461)
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 21-06-2015 10:10
brilliant show from bex last night from start to finish, showing for me why she is one of the most under-rated nightbabes currently on the shows
just over 2 months now till I see bex and her magnificent big natural boobs in manchester
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - sweetsugar007 - 22-06-2015 00:35
Personally I dont get it! If it were not for Big Brother she would be no where near these channels!
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - wackawoo - 22-06-2015 02:25
(22-06-2015 00:35 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: Personally I dont get it! If it were not for Big Brother she would be no where near these channels!
You don't get it? ok
She has very nice eyes
She has nice legs
she has nice hair
she has a nice mouth
She has nice teeth
She has a clean mouth
she has nice hands
She has nice feet
She has wonderful tits.
She has a good personality
So what is it your are struggling with and don't get?
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - KerrAvon - 22-06-2015 09:44
(21-06-2015 10:10 )Rammyrascal Wrote: brilliant show from bex last night from start to finish, showing for me why she is one of the most under-rated nightbabes currently on the shows
just over 2 months now till I see bex and her magnificent big natural boobs in manchester
Which means Rammy cannot afford to give her a bad review now even if he wanted to
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 22-06-2015 11:13
(22-06-2015 00:35 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: Personally I dont get it! If it were not for Big Brother she would be no where near these channels!
the fact that bex has been on the babeshows on various channels (including TVX, RLC & SinTV) for as long as she has been (think at least 6-7yrs now) clearly shows that lots of people get bex & find bex very attractive & filthy (I do) and she knows what to do to bring in the calls etc.
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - KerrAvon - 22-06-2015 12:12
Still avoided answering the question though, would she have been signed to (or would she even have tried) the babeshows without Big Brother? I suspect not.
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 22-06-2015 15:00
yes, I will accept if it wasn't for big brother bex would not have ever been on the babeshows, but I think you cant deny that bex has done very well on the babeshows given she has been on them for quite a few years now (about 6-7 years I think)
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - wackawoo - 22-06-2015 15:53
(22-06-2015 12:12 )KerrAvon Wrote: Still avoided answering the question though, would she have been signed to (or would she even have tried) the babeshows without Big Brother? I suspect not.
You're missing the point, it doesn't really matter how they were signed.
Personally, if I was the boss there there are many of the girls I wouldn't have signed and more I wouldn't give any where near the amount of air time to - it all depends on whos employing and who likes them at the interview stage. Would Louise Porter got signed had she not been on tv? probably not, doesn't mean she shouldn't be there and both clearly bring in a lot of money.
And why are you looking at her thread any way, I don't understand the Preeti women, never once looked at their thread.
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - nilford - 22-06-2015 16:19
(22-06-2015 12:12 )KerrAvon Wrote: Still avoided answering the question though, would she have been signed to (or would she even have tried) the babeshows without Big Brother? I suspect not.
Come at it from the other direction: does Bex have the charms and wherewithal to appear on these shows independently of her BB connection? The answer in my book is unequivocally yes. For those who share the predilection, she's a babe in the voluptuous tradition of the young Cathy Barry, Danielle T, Jemstone, Bianca Deluca, Jaye Rose and ex-Bluebirder Aneesha. Another way of looking at it is to ask: would being a female contestant on BB be enough by itself to secure a place on these shows? To which the answer has to be no; only certain former contestants would stand a realistic chance, were they ever to express a desire to appear. So, to a large degree, the BB connection is by-the-bye. It's an added 'novelty' factor; it's not a determining one.
RE: Bex Shiner - Sin TV & X-Streams - Chat Caps & Discussion - nilford - 22-06-2015 16:38
I don't mind people not finding Bex their cup of tea, but what I do dislike is the way she's held up by some as representing the sort of babe who shouldn't be appearing on these shows. That's when it becomes needless, nasty discrimination. If Bex doesn't do it for you, fine; fuck off and watch the many babes who fit your concept of what a babe 'should' look like! Just don't start opposing Bex on the grounds that voluptuously proportioned women shouldn't have a place on these shows full stop. Stop being selfish and insulting, and try to start being tolerant, inclusive and someone who supports the idea of variety.