+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Where is the proof? (/showthread.php?tid=65605)
RE: Where is the proof? - terence - 26-07-2015 20:50
temp post
RE: Where is the proof? - general drago - 26-07-2015 21:14
No prizes for guessing who from day 1 really is
Edit: his post was removed
RE: Where is the proof? - mrmann - 26-07-2015 21:27
Oddly enough, despite my views on many of the women who I've believed have gotten up to things on camera and behind the scenes, I've never believed anything was happening with Danni during a session. Yes there's been a guy pulling her hair at times, but you can always tell that he's there for a few seconds and then leaving, as his shadow movement is a dead giveaway. Danni to me is a very convincing performer, but her interaction moments always look staged to me. Also, most of the time with the door sessions, it's as if the cameraman is intentionally showing us that nothing is actually happening, as he'll frequently move the camera away from the door so we can tell nobody is behind her.
I know, crazy words coming from my mouth
RE: Where is the proof? - forumdude - 26-07-2015 22:37
Yes the harwood shows were entertaining but clearly fake,the hair pulling was just to stop it from getting boring at that stage,she did a couple of door shows and mentioned on the mic she was "getting it" behind the door,maybe that's why rlc got fined.
The ruby thing is completely different in my opinion.
RE: Where is the proof? - cwpussylover - 27-07-2015 08:41
I'm Guilty...as charged 
RE: Where is the proof? - munch1917 - 27-07-2015 21:32
(27-07-2015 20:19 )301 Wrote: Id recommend people should stop sending the videos, someone could be Ofcom or other bad guys undercover.
These are all 'old' vids, nothing ofcom can do about it now.
RE: Where is the proof? - HEX!T - 27-07-2015 21:40
lol the guys asking for proof, they get it now they dont want it. how ironic is that...
point and laughing at mrmann for being a fantasist. then when given proof of what he says, they want it to stop. because it spoils there own fantasy?.
or am i wrong lol...
il say 1 thing for him, he's brought a bit of life back to this place. and its made a change from reading all these "ugh! nutha shit night tonight posts"...
(btw thats just an example, no offence meant to the guys posting in there as most are genuinely and rightly pissed)
RE: Where is the proof? - M-L-L - 27-07-2015 22:00
And there was me thinking that this was a "first rule about Fight Club" thing.
I feel an FBSC coming on....
RE: Where is the proof? - HEX!T - 28-07-2015 01:26
aww lo0ks like i hurt some1s feelinz with my previous comment... aww sowweee!.
come on guys your all taking this shit way to seriously...
RE: Where is the proof? - munch1917 - 28-07-2015 04:46
(27-07-2015 21:40 )HEX!T Wrote: lol the guys asking for proof, they get it now they dont want it. how ironic is that...
point and laughing at mrmann for being a fantasist. then when given proof of what he says, they want it to stop. because it spoils there own fantasy?.
or am i wrong lol...
I still don't see any real 'proof' of this theory.
According to mrmanns recent posts, this stuff happens 'regularly' whatever that means, and he also stated that 'half the women fool around with the producers' is that on-screen or off-screen, unclear.
What we have, even according to your own post in the sintv thread, is about FOUR well known and well documented cases of on-screen 'activity'.
Four incidents in the entire recent history of the babeshows does not equate to 'regular' in my book, and nor does it equate to 'ooh look that girl leaned off camera, she must be blowing someone' every other night.