+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: The Pad (/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Thread: Victoria - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=9271)
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - speedybert - 30-07-2009 15:16
(30-07-2009 14:47 )stilettos Wrote: Untill i have success with rapid share ect, heres more from the same clip!
She is looking particularly fine today in the Pad's standard issue PVC halter neck top.Especially as she is not wearing a bra and her lovely natural curves are on display
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - speedybert - 30-07-2009 17:02
Seeing Victoria on the Pad today I thought I would post up this new comp vid for your enjoyment.It's BangBabes stuff but as she is a daytime girl now I feel this is the best location for it.Old and new appearances(pre and post baby)
http://rapidshare.com/files/261828849/VictoriaOld_New.wmv
If you haven't already repped please do so and enjoy
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - stilettos - 30-07-2009 22:31
(30-07-2009 17:02 )speedybert Wrote: Seeing Victoria on the Pad today I thought I would post up this new comp vid for your enjoyment.It's BangBabes stuff but as she is a daytime girl now I feel this is the best location for it.Old and new appearances(pre and post baby)
http://rapidshare.com/files/261828849/VictoriaOld_New.wmv
If you haven't already repped please do so and enjoy
Shes had a baby? !! Where did it come from, a surrugate mother? Theres no sign of any stretchmarks,and i dont think she was away a year from bb to the day show, or vice verca? Where did you hear that? is she married?
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - speedybert - 31-07-2009 09:13
(30-07-2009 22:31 )stilettos Wrote:(30-07-2009 17:02 )speedybert Wrote: Seeing Victoria on the Pad today I thought I would post up this new comp vid for your enjoyment.It's BangBabes stuff but as she is a daytime girl now I feel this is the best location for it.Old and new appearances(pre and post baby)
http://rapidshare.com/files/261828849/VictoriaOld_New.wmv
If you haven't already repped please do so and enjoy
Shes had a baby? !! Where did it come from, a surrugate mother? Theres no sign of any stretchmarks,and i dont think she was away a year from bb to the day show, or vice verca? Where did you hear that? is she married?
She left BB night shows early last year appeared on the pad,started "blooming" and was then off our screens until December when she came back on.Also Jamie when he was still with BB confirmed that she went to have a sprog hence her absence from our screens.
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - stilettos - 31-07-2009 11:32
Thanks for the info! they dont talk about stuff like that on the day show. late at night they used to tell us more about what theyre doing. Shes made a great recovery,tum looks flat and firm! This explains why shes not doing nights...at the moment!
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 31-07-2009 14:00
wonder if victoria is pregnant again which is why she's on days now. she's looking sensational today
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - speedybert - 31-07-2009 22:47
(31-07-2009 14:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: wonder if victoria is pregnant again which is why she's on days now. she's looking sensational today
That thought had occurred to me as well.
She was looking good again today especially late in the afternoon when she had a change of wardrobe.Against my normal feelings about the day/night night/day girls swapping around I think she is just as good on the days.She was damn fine on the phones at night and judging by how she performs during the dayshows I think she could be well up for some saucy chat
She also seems to wear the bare minimum underneath her clothes as shown by a fair bit of camel toe.
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - stilettos - 02-08-2009 00:00
(27-07-2009 14:19 )Footman Wrote:(27-07-2009 13:39 )stilettos Wrote: [quote='stiletto fettish' pid='185462' dateline='1248541598']
Simply the best legs on bangbabes,and now the pad (tho emma spellar(too skinny) and holly james are next in line)! Shes also,in my opinion, the only girl who wears proper stiletto courts! High,no peep toe(ugh!) and no platform, perfect! I think she should get a boobjob tho. 9 out of 10!
I have to completely disagree with you! And i hope Victoria doesn't read this thread, as what you've said would be the worst advice for her to listen to. Pretty sure Tiffany is wearing the exact same top Victoria wore Saturday afternoon????? Tiffany has fake boobs, TWO bra's on (well it looks like it from the back as i can see 2 pairs of straps), no kids, is a similar age to Lady V, and in my opinion doesn't come anywhere near close to as good as Victoria looked on Sat. I hate comparing the girls, especially as i love Tiffany. But how you can think Victoria needs a boob job is beyond me. But then again i do love em bouncy
I rest my case! (or maybe better on tiff's?!!)
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - stilettos - 02-08-2009 00:52
Finally,and as requested, heres the clip. Simply victoria at the top of her game! Post first child and no sign of any evidence! For me the spell is broken on a babe when shes had a kid or gotten married, yet vic,from the old,original guard of BB,is hardworking,and consistent. Great legs,perfect shoes,and for me,the only non-blonde,non boobjob girl i have any time for! Enjoy-particularly the first 2 mins of this!! i have more of course...from a while back...she was just as good then,but this is historic, as its post baby, 14 april 2009!http://rapidshare.com/files/262689738/0001.mpg
RE: Victoria - Discussion Thread - richp2k - 02-08-2009 10:51
(02-08-2009 00:52 )stilettos Wrote: Finally,and as requested, heres the clip. Simply victoria at the top of her game! Post first child and no sign of any evidence! For me the spell is broken on a babe when shes had a kid or gotten married, yet vic,from the old,original guard of BB,is hardworking,and consistent. Great legs,perfect shoes,and for me,the only non-blonde,non boobjob girl i have any time for! Enjoy-particularly the first 2 mins of this!! i have more of course...from a while back...she was just as good then,but this is historic, as its post baby, 14 april 2009!http://rapidshare.com/files/262689738/0001.mpg
cheers buddy! is good quality too! u haven't got anymore of the same set have you? also is it 3 mins long? my comp went a bit west when it was downloading, so jus wana check it downloaded right!! remember u said summit bout 4 mins in an earlier post.