The UK Babe Channels Forum
Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)



RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 29-07-2012 01:56

Perhaps Mr Richards wanted to stop that sort of thing?

Or he doesnt watch after 9?


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - robby - 29-07-2012 08:02

Wait until the Women`s 10m diving and water polo events are shown on the BBC from the Olympics. Boobs popping out all over the place. They may only be slips, but dayshows get fined for just the same Wink


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - blackjaques - 29-07-2012 08:18

(29-07-2012 01:56 )eccles Wrote:  Perhaps Mr Richards wanted to stop that sort of thing?

Or he doesnt watch after 9?

I've heard his mam does not let him stay up even that late.


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 29-07-2012 10:35

(29-07-2012 08:02 )robby Wrote:  Wait until the Women`s 10m diving and water polo events are shown on the BBC from the Olympics. Boobs popping out all over the place. They may only be slips, but dayshows get fined for just the same Wink

The mad trend for censorship has even begun to work its cancer into stuff like that now - I think you'll find they're now very careful with their 'framing'. As for them still using underwater cameras for the water polo, forget it! bladewave




RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 29-07-2012 11:20

Speaking of perving at the Olympics, it's just occurred to me that you can't rewind or pause while in interactive mode... which is a bit of a pisser because we're being treated to some great shots on the beam in the women's gymnastics.


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - robby - 04-08-2012 22:31

(29-07-2012 10:35 )StanTheMan Wrote:  As for them still using underwater cameras for the water polo, forget it! bladewave


I don`t know, these are a couple of stills from vids I made for a sports forum Wink

[Image: th_890493804_spainvusa.prelimsframe67_122_251lo.jpg] [Image: th_847581646_LoudyWigginsRachelBuggframe...2_48lo.jpg] [Image: th_848329276_sarahBarrowToniaCouchframe2..._484lo.jpg]


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 04-08-2012 23:10

I know they're using an underwater cam for the diving, I even managed to catch a few HD slips like the ones you've posted here - even the commentator (the idiot) made reference to it after one slip when he said something like, "You can see the divers there adjusting themselves as the force of the water tries to rip their costumes off."

But are you saying the water polo one is from this Olympics?? I was watching it for a good half hour or so the other day and they didn't use it once.


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - robby - 04-08-2012 23:14

Yep, the Water Polo was from a prelim match of Spain V USA. The Female commentator made a similar comment on thelines of someone was showing more than she wanted too to the crowd Smile


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 04-08-2012 23:39

Brilliant!!! Will have to start watching more of the water olympics Bounce


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 05-08-2012 01:57

Talking of water sports, I doubt we will get another Paula Radcliffe moment. Pity, it might have got more people interested.