+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Chat Back (/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: Channel 960 - chat back (/showthread.php?tid=1253)
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - Stewartie - 25-01-2009 23:58
Hexit Wrote:oopnorth Wrote:Yeah fair enough Hexit, what can I say I've got high standards, guess I'll be tuning in somewhere else tonight.nowt to do with standards m8, if the girl gets the callers in then thats all thats important at the end of the day, you may not like her but by the looks of it she is popular, so the producer will say "bye" oopnorth "sorry we cant give you what u want" but we are gona give these other guys what they want coz they aint as choosy, and theres 5 of them and only 1 of you, meanin more money for us. in reality the show is only for the guys who call and for prospective callers. guys like dreamweaver dont count to them, the only use they have is word of mouth to other possable callers.
we may not like it or care to admit it, but they are there to try and make money and whatever brings in the most revinue will be there winning formular. if that means they loos viewers to gain callers it will be a fair swap in there eyes.
Don't see much evidence that the Babecast pre-occupation with porn girls has paid dividends. I quite enjoyed the gyrations of Lolly Badcock for a short time but when you are bouncing up and down at a thousand revolutions a minute you clearly can't be taking calls at the same time and she was taking precious few on the occasions I watched.
The much maligned Hotel Voyeur seems to buck all the trends. They have up to five girls on screen at the same time on occasions (which is at least two too many) but they must be attracting the calls to justify it.
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - Digital Dave - 26-01-2009 00:00
Hexit Wrote:oopnorth Wrote:Yeah fair enough Hexit, what can I say I've got high standards, guess I'll be tuning in somewhere else tonight.nowt to do with standards m8, if the girl gets the callers in then thats all thats important at the end of the day, you may not like her but by the looks of it she is popular, so the producer will say "bye" oopnorth "sorry we cant give you what u want" but we are gona give these other guys what they want coz they aint as choosy, and theres 5 of them and only 1 of you, meanin more money for us. in reality the show is only for the guys who call and for prospective callers. guys like dreamweaver dont count to them, the only use they have is word of mouth to other possable callers.
we may not like it or care to admit it, but they are there to try and make money and whatever brings in the most revinue will be there winning formular. if that means they loose viewers to gain callers it will be a fair swap in there eyes.
Spot on mate.
By the way, I think I've negotiated you and me a producing role with Superspurs' new setup! Should be a laugh..
(See the Producer thread.)
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - SuperSpurs - 26-01-2009 00:03
[/quote]
Spot on mate.
By the way, I think I've negotiated you and me a producing role with Superspurs' new setup! Should be a laugh..
(See the Producer thread.)
[/quote]
If you boys live near London you can come and work for me anytime. I see real passion for this game in your posts...
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - G@Z! - 26-01-2009 00:06
no mate i don't live in london
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - oopnorth - 26-01-2009 00:26
Hexit Wrote:oopnorth Wrote:Yeah fair enough Hexit, what can I say I've got high standards, guess I'll be tuning in somewhere else tonight.nowt to do with standards m8, if the girl gets the callers in then thats all thats important at the end of the day, you may not like her but by the looks of it she is popular, so the producer will say "bye" oopnorth "sorry we cant give you what u want" but we are gona give these other guys what they want coz they aint as choosy, and theres 5 of them and only 1 of you, meanin more money for us. in reality the show is only for the guys who call and for prospective callers. guys like dreamweaver dont count to them, the only use they have is word of mouth to other possable callers.
we may not like it or care to admit it, but they are there to try and make money and whatever brings in the most revinue will be there winning formular. if that means they loose viewers to gain callers it will be a fair swap in there eyes.
I've got no problem with them wanting to make money and they can do it any way they choose, I'm saying I like a particular type of girl and not any old tart and she doesn't do it for me, it only takes a button press on my remote and everyone's happy.
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - datalossfs - 26-01-2009 00:43
Indeed I believe the term is 'Vote with your Remote'
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - Stewartie - 26-01-2009 01:03
oopnorth Wrote:I've got no problem with them wanting to make money and they can do it any way they choose, I'm saying I like a particular type of girl and not any old tart and she doesn't do it for me, it only takes a button press on my remote and everyone's happy.
Im not remotely into porn but have absolutely nothing against girls who choose to make their living in this way. All I am saying is that if 960 wants to go down this road then they have run out of ideas and some other channels are well ahead of the game.. not with spectacular results so far as I can make out.
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - HEX!T - 26-01-2009 01:12
eh! i dont get it, your not into porn but you watch 900+ channels. just what would you class these channels as if there not porn, they may not be hardcore cocksucking, cumguzzling, movies but they are porn, they are verbal interactive porn. ie phone sex which is an established niech in the porn marketplace.
sorry m8 it is porn and yer fooling yerself if you think its not.
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - SuperSpurs - 26-01-2009 01:28
Stewartie Wrote:Hexit Wrote:oopnorth Wrote:Yeah fair enough Hexit, what can I say I've got high standards, guess I'll be tuning in somewhere else tonight.nowt to do with standards m8, if the girl gets the callers in then thats all thats important at the end of the day, you may not like her but by the looks of it she is popular, so the producer will say "bye" oopnorth "sorry we cant give you what u want" but we are gona give these other guys what they want coz they aint as choosy, and theres 5 of them and only 1 of you, meanin more money for us. in reality the show is only for the guys who call and for prospective callers. guys like dreamweaver dont count to them, the only use they have is word of mouth to other possable callers.
we may not like it or care to admit it, but they are there to try and make money and whatever brings in the most revinue will be there winning formular. if that means they loos viewers to gain callers it will be a fair swap in there eyes.
Don't see much evidence that the Babecast pre-occupation with porn girls has paid dividends. I quite enjoyed the gyrations of Lolly Badcock for a short time but when you are bouncing up and down at a thousand revolutions a minute you clearly can't be taking calls at the same time and she was taking precious few on the occasions I watched.
The much maligned Hotel Voyeur seems to buck all the trends. They have up to five girls on screen at the same time on occasions (which is at least two too many) but they must be attracting the calls to justify it.
The problem with Hotel Voyeur is that often they don't actually pay their girls. I know of at least 4 who have been knocked for a couple of grand. Draw your own conclusions about that one....
RE: Channel 960 - chat back - datalossfs - 26-01-2009 01:31
Ouch! how the hell are they still on air?