Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 16-07-2011 20:41 (16-07-2011 19:30 )eagle_si Wrote: I don't know exactly what their procedures are, but if only one person out of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions of viewers/listeners can be bothered to write and complain about a programme, surely that complaint should be just thrown in the bin, with a response to the complainant telling them to get a life and stop wasting time and money. Don't be silly, eagle_si, that would involve Ofcom using common sense and having a sense of perspective. RE: Ofcom Discussion - iamthatjack - 16-07-2011 20:50 I am flabbergasted that a single complaint leads to all the crap that these channels have to go through just to air! One vote! Unreal. Imagine what would happen if they received 2 complaints?! Probably not allowed to look into the camera as that suggests a bit of hanky panky, and loose fitting clothing, with nothing higher than ankles and no cleavage or arms on display! Ofcom must be so bored in their offices if 1 vote leads to this kind of vendetta against the channels RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 16-07-2011 20:54 (16-07-2011 20:50 )iamthatjack Wrote: I am flabbergasted that a single complaint leads to all the crap that these channels have to go through just to air! One vote! Unreal. It's discrimination at its most blatant. There's not a single other programme on the mainstream channels that Ofcom would investigate on the strength of one complaint... not a one!! RE: Ofcom Discussion - eagle_si - 16-07-2011 20:56 (16-07-2011 20:41 )StanTheMan Wrote: Don't be silly, eagle_si, that would involve Ofcom using common sense and having a sense of perspective. as I pointed out in the second last sentence in my post ... RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 16-07-2011 21:00 Sorry, eagle_si, I stopped reading at the point at which I quoted as I was getting too annoyed at the utter madness of Ofcom's workings. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 16-07-2011 21:01 Did anyone ever see that recent episode of Sexcetera which detailed rough sex in barns with violent women? Quite a few uncensored vaginal shots, and completely uncensored penis shots, and one woman even boasted about how when her male slave complained about her being too tame, she took the headboard off of her bead and smacked him in the head with it. Context RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 16-07-2011 21:05 No, but I did see an episode of Dirty Sanchez where one of the members pissed over the head of another. No pixalating or blurring - just his cock on full view while he pissed on his mate's head. Context RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 17-07-2011 00:59 (16-07-2011 21:05 )StanTheMan Wrote: No, but I did see an episode of Dirty Sanchez where one of the members pissed over the head of another. No pixalating or blurring - just his cock on full view while he pissed on his mate's head. Yet that is clearly beyond R18 as humilarition and degradation is banned by the BBFC. Oh, unless it is in context. And let me guess what the context was - humilating his mate? RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 17-07-2011 01:02 (16-07-2011 19:30 )eagle_si Wrote: I don't know exactly what their procedures are, but if only one person out of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions of viewers/listeners can be bothered to write and complain about a programme, surely that complaint should be just thrown in the bin, with a response to the complainant telling them to get a life and stop wasting time and money. Ofcom have clearly stated that what they assess is whether there has been a breach of the rules, and that can occur even if the complaints are few or even nonexistent. RE: Ofcom Discussion - HenryF - 17-07-2011 09:49 (16-07-2011 20:50 )iamthatjack Wrote: I am flabbergasted that a single complaint leads to all the crap that these channels have to go through just to air! One vote! Unreal. Imagine what would happen if they received 2 complaints?! Probably not allowed to look into the camera as that suggests a bit of hanky panky, and loose fitting clothing, with nothing higher than ankles and no cleavage or arms on display! There is no boredom there, this is an orchestrated policy of intimidation which has chipped away at the content structure these channels are able to produce. The aim is that through over-regulation they will ultimately become commercially non-viable. Ofcom and the government recognises that there is no legal basis for the proscription of this type of content - so must continue with its non representative investigations into solitary complaints. In the interests of transparency (one of the core values of the quango on its establishment), I would be glad to see published the individual complaints - anonymity could be provided, if necessary. I do not believe that the basis Ofcom is working on is correct. Nor do I believe that the complaints are genuine or that Ofcoms complaints procedure is robust enough. As an independent regulator it is sorely lacking in integrity. |