+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - gazfc - 17-07-2011 14:06
I've just noticed in somebody's post that a babestation show was recently found in breach, can somebody confirm this? Can't seem to find a reference to it.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Sm© - 17-07-2011 14:35
^^^ http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=20358&pid=855900#pid855900
RE: Ofcom Discussion - SYBORG666 - 17-07-2011 15:09
Just read about the current investigations and seriously at this rate the babes will be wearing burkahs within a year or two.
Look babechannels, now is the time to put your differences aside and start making a stance against Ofcom because they are clearly targeting you because you won't fight back and you will eventually pay the ultimate price. The only way to beat Ofcom, is to join forces and take them on as an industry and not as individual companies.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - iamthatjack - 17-07-2011 15:27
...and see them all taken off the air
RE: Ofcom Discussion - gazfc - 17-07-2011 15:45
(17-07-2011 14:35 )Steve Sm© Wrote: ^^^ http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=20358&pid=855900#pid855900
Thanks for that, so it seems babestation can be got after even with a dutch license, as so few have come against bs this kind of confirms to me that they're behind all the complaints against the other channels
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Sm© - 17-07-2011 16:06
Close, the channel behind all the complaints does start with a "B"...
RE: Ofcom Discussion - operoc25 - 17-07-2011 16:13
I was just reading some of the ofcoms brodcast bullitin, what a load of shit that they come out with. They need to losen the ropes alittle bit for some of the night shows, they get very boring becasue the girls cant move in a sexual manner as much as they used to be able to do.
But i do agree to some extent some of the rules that are set in place for the nightshows, like not showing full gentials to the camera, but i think that they should be alowed to rub oil or loation on their genitals area afterall its the 18years over channels.
Feel free to argue if you dissagree with anything i have posted above.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 17-07-2011 16:47
(17-07-2011 15:45 )gazfc Wrote:(17-07-2011 14:35 )Steve Sm© Wrote: ^^^ http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=20358&pid=855900#pid855900
Thanks for that, so it seems babestation can be got after even with a dutch license, as so few have come against bs this kind of confirms to me that they're behind all the complaints against the other channels
Sky channel 909 "Get luck TV" does not have a Dutch licence and Cellcast/BS don't own the channel , Cellcast lease the air time from a company called "Grandiose Limited" , it was Grandiose that was found "in breach "not Cellcast . Sky Ch 906 is the channel with the Dutch licence . Sky Ch 910 also has a Ofcom licence and not Dutch .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Roquentin - 17-07-2011 17:00
Here is a selection of Gold Plated Pension's reading of the situation from the last bulletin -
(04-07-2011 18:45 )Gold Plated Pension Wrote: Elite TV must feel somewhat relieved in that Ofc@m state that they are not proposing any regulatory penalty at this time but that these breaches will be held on file. Reading between the lines this means that once they have processed all the breaches against RLC and issued a financial penalty against Playboy TV and Just4us Limited (putting RLC out of business) then they will concentrate again on Elite TV (pro-active monitoring of this broadcaster will continue during this period)...
...So expect some serious financial penalties to be issued that will more than likely put some broadcasters out of business...
...Without even going to my crystal ball expect to see a total eradication of babe shows on the FTA EPG within 6 months...
...Be fully compliant with all demands made by Ofc@m that the shows become so tame they go out of business due to a lack of income...
Of course this is all theoretical boll#cks as no one knows the ultimate aim of the regulator, we need a mole.
Now he has done some sterling work here in the full posts, summarising and raising the issues. But I suspect that some of this analysis is exaggerated?
I suspect the recent clampdown arose due to shows going consistently too far about a year ago? (I'm thinking bang babes such as Jet Black sessions/the pad where about 3-4 padlings were effectively doing nightshows but with bikinis on). So now the channels are living with the new guidelines. Sure its restrictive but they are currently living within those guidelines, our tastes are taking a hit but they are still making money. Is there any real reason to think they will restrict any further?
I would be hopeful that if Elite (as an example - see highlight above) can show that they have taken steps to keep within guidelines, and demonstrate that it is working (much less breaches - plus they lead to further steps taken - they reprimanded a cameraman! poor guy), then the penalties may be waived or held. We all know they can demonstrate that as we have all seen the effects. The bulletin section detailing Elite's response shows that is exactly what they are doing. I doubt if the regulator-to-business relationship is as hostile an interaction as we might think it is.
It seems like we'd have to live with the content we have now, but I doubt if further developments would happen. Perhaps more internet content like BS/BB have developed. Talk of newspapers, legal cases, lobbying MPs all seems bombastic and unlikely to do anything to me. Perhaps even needless if the extra content is available in parallel content online.
Clearly I may be naive on this.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - gazfc - 17-07-2011 17:17
(17-07-2011 16:47 )mr mystery Wrote:(17-07-2011 15:45 )gazfc Wrote:(17-07-2011 14:35 )Steve Sm© Wrote: ^^^ http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=20358&pid=855900#pid855900
Thanks for that, so it seems babestation can be got after even with a dutch license, as so few have come against bs this kind of confirms to me that they're behind all the complaints against the other channels
Sky channel 909 "Get luck TV" does not have a Dutch licence and Cellcast/BS don't own the channel , Cellcast lease the air time from a company called "Grandiose Limited" , it was Grandiose that was found "in breach "not Cellcast . Sky Ch 906 is the channel with the Dutch licence . Sky Ch 910 also has a Ofcom licence and not Dutch .
Once again thanks, hmmm still why so few? The other channels are getting hammered compaired to them, the 2 b's working together?