Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 |
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 17-09-2012 21:51 Yoga? Hockey? Football? Synchronised swimming? Jello wrestling? RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - admiral decker - 02-10-2012 00:33 (12-08-2012 19:38 )Scottishbloke Wrote: didn't SKY Sports back in the old Astra 1 days air late night strippers after midnight Sky Sports broadcasting strippers - is striptease classed as a sport then? RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 02-10-2012 02:39 More of an art form. Good to have you back. RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 05-10-2012 00:39 Classic night for strong content on the film channels, at least from a horror perspective. Film 4 is showing Quills, cert 18, the story of the Marquis de Sade. Features Kate Winslet. Despite that the write up says "Stong language/sexual scenes/violence." Ring now Kate is reading aloud a passage about sliding a hand between a womans legs and the wetness their and has just said "Quim". The jailer appears to be masturbating (unseen). 01:10am-03:35am The previous film was Saw 11:05pm-01:10am, cert 18, torture porn. (Still showing on +1). The Horror Channel is showing One Eyed Monster, cert 18, 01:15am-02:50am. A killer penis is loose on the set of a porn movie and fucks people to death, starting with Ron Jeremy. The previous film was Hellbound: Hellraiser 2, 11:20pm-01:15am and still on +1, which has just featured a walking flayed corpse that a mad doctor imagines is his beautiful wife, followed by cheezewire cutting into his flesh. 1988, not sure if this was on the video nasties list of film that were totally, categorically banned under Margaret Thatcher. Thats 4 films featuring strong violence/gore/sexual content simultaneously. Needless to say adult channels are barely approaching cert 15 strength and the babes are not allowed to simulate masturbation or say "Quim". Unlike Kate Winslett. RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 05-10-2012 00:54 [php] (05-10-2012 00:39 )eccles Wrote: Classic night for strong content on the film channels, at least from a horror perspective. The women aren't allowed to say the name of a body part either on the adult channels. No penis, no vagina, because it's all so dangerous RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 05-10-2012 01:38 (05-10-2012 00:39 )eccles Wrote: The previous film was Hellbound: Hellraiser 2, 11:20pm-01:15am and still on +1, which has just featured a walking flayed corpse that a mad doctor imagines is his beautiful wife, followed by cheezewire cutting into his flesh. 1988, not sure if this was on the video nasties list of film that were totally, categorically banned under Margaret Thatcher. You're a little confused there, eccles. The Video Nasties Scare was early 80s, HH2 was '88. It may have come in for some stick during the second wave and re-emergence of the video nasties nonsense in '92, but certainly not in the original. RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Shawnwilson - 05-10-2012 18:39 The rules on what can be done on normal tv compared to what can be done on a shopping channel licence is stupid. if ofcom is protecting children from what is said/seen on adult channels, why aren't they protecting the very same way on normal tv!? There basically saying you don't have a right to be offended by seeing a pussy on channel 4 e.g (jimmy carr's face!) But you do have a right to be offended/protected from seeing a pussy on a 900 channel!!!! I think ofcom should use one of these shopping channel licence's, to buy a brain!!!! RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 07-10-2012 23:38 Burlesque Undressed Sky Arts 1 midnight-2 am Quote:In Alison Grists revealing documentary, burlesque star Immodesty Blaize examines British burlesque and the resurgence in its popularity. Also in HD. Sky Information also has the letter W to the right of the title. Various current burlesque stars recreate acts from the past, some more risque that the originals, and talk about "respecting" the memory of the original stars and "not feeling demeaned". So its Art then. RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 09-10-2012 23:08 In the interests of research I was looking around YouTube and found this clip. It seems to be from Big Brother and has an E4 ident. An attractive woman gets in and out of a shared hottub wearing just a thong. She snogs another woman. A man cups her breasts and sucks her nipples (unclear if they have company at this point*). Another large woman bounces up and down topless. It may be age restricted but it is on YouTube so its not porn and thats official. * edit - the soundtrack suggests they do have company. edit 2 - sorry, Stans right, its DailyMotion. Get so much YouTube crap in every search Im starting to think everything is YouTube. Even so, it was on E4 which is not a porn channel and DailyMotion isnt (quite) a porn site either. Sex in Water by kokinesexy1 RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 10-10-2012 00:48 ^^ That's a dailymotion clip, not youtube. |