+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Webbiola - 17-07-2011 17:24
Perhaps E and RLC should get together and complain about B and how AL had see through knicks on last night. That's my 2 Bs, I mean 2 Ps worth.
Thinking about it though, I quite liked the see through knicks and I like AL and a lot of the B girls.......this is all BS.... I wish O would FO!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Roquentin - 17-07-2011 17:28
(17-07-2011 16:13 )operoc25 Wrote: But i do agree to some extent some of the rules that are set in place for the nightshows, like not showing full gentials to the camera, but i think that they should be alowed to rub oil or loation on their genitals area afterall its the 18years over channels.
Feel free to argue if you dissagree with anything i have posted above.
I agree with you Operoc I would like to see more, but its interesting to describe what exactly is on offer. At the moment it looks like the babes are allowed to apply oil or cream to their boobs or bum (or rest of body), by hand (otherwise it looks like ejaculate! lol) but not between their legs, not even on top of a thong.
I'd say its still hot and worth a call
(someone hand the oil to Danica or Dionne plz!)
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Roquentin - 17-07-2011 17:46
I also dont think the number of complaints compared to mainstream shows is a big issue. Although it is interesting to note how few people do complain (thanks for the posts).
I would guess most of the public would readily think that its Ofcom's job to regulate the babechannels. Ofcom have a new(ish) set of guidelines to enforce, specific to the babechannels. Obviously they would start by monitoring closely the industry leaders.
But there is a certain echo here of the Jonathan Ross/Russll Brand scandal. Most people blissfully dont know to complain (thank God, sshhhh! dont tell them!) But given the chance, show your granny an old Jet Black show and see if she wants to! (second thoughts dont)
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 17-07-2011 20:55
(17-07-2011 16:13 )operoc25 Wrote: But i do agree to some extent some of the rules that are set in place for the nightshows, like not showing full gentials to the camera, but i think that they should be alowed to rub oil or loation on their genitals area afterall its the 18years over channels.
Feel free to argue if you dissagree with anything i have posted above.
Okay, you did offer... why are you of the opinion that a specified adult channel, located in the adult section of Sky's EPG which can be locked out by anyone that doesn't want them, be restricted from showing full genitals to the camera??
RE: Ofcom Discussion - iamthatjack - 17-07-2011 21:09
I was going to reply to StanTheMan's post to show my agreement for what he has said, but in 2 lines, he has summed up the ridiculous sanctions an ADULT channel has on showing ADULT scenes - beggars belief
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Renfrew169 - 17-07-2011 21:13
(17-07-2011 21:09 )iamthatjack Wrote: I was going to reply to StanTheMan's post to show my agreement for what he has said, but in 2 lines, he has summed up the ridiculous sanctions an ADULT channel has on showing ADULT scenes - beggars belief
This is also my point - it's either adult or it isn't and if it isn't allowed to be then it shouldn't be in the adult section!!!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - SYBORG666 - 17-07-2011 22:04
I couldn't put it better myself Renfrew.
Ofcom keep talking about content and viewers expectations. So if you tune into a channel located in the adult section, should you not expect to see things of an adult nature after the official watershed because if you tune into a channel in the movie, sport or news section that is exactly what you get.
It is quite clear that the babechannels are being singled out by Ofcom and the babechannels need to do something about it. So, like i've said in a previous post the babechannels need to quit this petty rivalry aside and take on Ofcom as an industry, then maybe Ofcom will get off their back and can then start putting on the kind of shows that most of us are wanting and generating a bigger revenue.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - iamthatjack - 17-07-2011 22:09
It's interesting. On Sky, before the watershed, you need to put in your PIN before you can watch a tv show / movie / whatever, that is rated 12 and above.
Surely by just doing the same thing would resolve the issue, that way ANYTHING could be shown on an adult channel, knowing that PINs should only be known to adults!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Renfrew169 - 17-07-2011 22:12
(17-07-2011 22:04 )SYBORG666 Wrote: I couldn't put it better myself Renfrew.
Ofcom keep talking about content and viewers expectations. So if you tune into a channel located in the adult section, should you not expect to see things of an adult nature after the official watershed because if you tune into a channel in the movie, sport or news section that is exactly what you get.
It is quite clear that the babechannels are being singled out by Ofcom and the babechannels need to do something about it. So, like i've said in a previous post the babechannels need to quit this petty rivalry aside and take on Ofcom as an industry, then maybe Ofcom will get off their back and can then start putting on the kind of shows that most of us are wanting and generating a bigger revenue.
Like I've said before - I for one don't want or expect full blown porn - I just want the models to be able to be natural on the screen, be able to move around naked without having to contort themselves into unnatural positions because they may show their pussy. I also think they should be able to exhibit their pussy to the camera. I really can't see that the world will come to an end if this were the case or that we would suddenly change into sex starved maniacs roaming the streets and a danger to the female population.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Roquentin - 17-07-2011 22:27
All very well having that view, I would love it too. But Ofcom (and BCAP etc) are the government appointed quango who have decided otherwise. Lobby your MP? Write to the newspapers? Good luck (sincerely - but I'm not holding my breath). I cant think what the courts can do (I assume thats what 'take on Ofcom' means), they would likely just point to government to decide what the quango's remit is.
There are things to wonder about, such as the extent of this alternative license, also the imbalance of concentration on some channels and not others. Not sure how to address those, but presumably the channels will try themselves.
Think theres another thread discussing pin stuff. Maybe some hope there?