Scottish Independence (the sequel) - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114) +---- Forum: News Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Thread: Scottish Independence (the sequel) (/showthread.php?tid=50701) |
RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - lovebabes56 - 20-03-2017 07:29 As far as I'm concerned I think we should wait and see what Sturgeon's next move will be before commenting further It was interesting on 5 Live last night as to how they likened the current spat between May & Sturgeon to the one between Mary Queen of Scots & Elizabeth 1st. Pretty much almost the same scenario but no social media was available then so I can only imagine the letters that went between them and they NEVER actually met. RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - Nadam - 20-03-2017 08:38 (20-03-2017 01:47 )The Silent Majority Wrote:(20-03-2017 00:45 )Nadam Wrote:(20-03-2017 00:03 )wackawoo Wrote:(19-03-2017 22:16 )The Silent Majority Wrote: That will happen only in your tiny, xenophobic mind. Disagreeing with you is not trolling. You need to get a grip, or a dictionary. RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - wackawoo - 20-03-2017 13:12 (20-03-2017 07:29 )babelover48 Wrote: As far as I'm concerned I think we should wait and see what Sturgeon's next move will be before commenting further It was interesting on 5 Live last night as to how they likened the current spat between May & Sturgeon to the one between Mary Queen of Scots & Elizabeth 1st. Look how that turned out. RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - mikedafc - 22-03-2017 01:24 Seems a debate on NHS in Scotland was cancelled so that the Scottish Parliament can have a 2 day debate on another independence referendum RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - lovebabes56 - 22-03-2017 04:49 I would have thought the NHS in Scotland would have made for a far more riveting debate!! Why waste two days debating on an independence referendum when the NHS needs are far more important right now? Apologies if I have brought up an issue that probably doesn't exist RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - Censorship :-( - 22-03-2017 11:35 (22-03-2017 04:49 )babelover48 Wrote: I would have thought the NHS in Scotland would have made for a far more riveting debate!! Why waste two days debating on an independence referendum when the NHS needs are far more important right now? Perhaps because the NHS has been discussed many times in Parliament, and will, no doubt, continue to be discussed in the future, whereas the issue of Independence is fundamental to everything else, and is an issue that has been raised again as a direct result of the EU referendum, and the resultant, ongoing situation re. 'brexit'? And I would guess that it depends on your point of view as to whether it is a 'waste', or not. RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - circles_o_o_o - 22-03-2017 12:08 Would there still be an "NHS in Scotland" to debate about after independence? RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - Scots Napoleon - 22-03-2017 13:08 (22-03-2017 12:08 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Would there still be an "NHS in Scotland" to debate about after independence? Healthcare is devolved in the UK. NHS Scotland is therefore operated by the Scottish Government. I don't understand the reason for your question, as the Scottish Government does not need independence to run NHS Scotland. It already has that power. RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - circles_o_o_o - 22-03-2017 13:19 (22-03-2017 13:08 )Scots Napoleon Wrote: I don't understand the reason for your question I was making a throwaway comment about the word "National" in NHS. But as you say it is actually called "NHS Scotland" so there you go. RE: Scottish Independence (the sequel) - terence - 22-03-2017 16:15 think the car ran into a load of french schoolkids also. ffs! what the fuck's wrong with people? |