+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Studio66 & OnlyFans (/showthread.php?tid=74869)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - lovebabes56 - 27-10-2018 14:38
I think the whole saga would not have happened if S66 weren't so slow in reacting. I only subscribe to Mikaela's page that is all
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - William H Bonney - 27-10-2018 14:40
(27-10-2018 14:08 )babefan2012 Wrote: It looks like Clare is staying, cutting off Twitter and Onlyfans.
Yes Clare has effectively come out as a remainer. That doesn't surprise me at all.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - elgar1uk - 27-10-2018 14:44
(27-10-2018 14:21 )goatman222 Wrote: Clare is studio 66 much like ashley emma is babestation
Ashley Emma's worked on other channels. You can't say the same about Clare.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - The Goatman - 27-10-2018 14:57
Yeah i know ashley was on elite tv first but she is their main woman shes the face of bs...i mean you have lori and dannii (gone now) who could be considered but lets be honest ashley is the star of the show
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - jobuddy18uk - 27-10-2018 15:20
(26-10-2018 19:55 )ryuken Wrote:(26-10-2018 14:22 )interzone Wrote:(26-10-2018 11:09 )goatman222 Wrote: Onlyfans will be a short term thing.I've followed a lot of pages and none have offered enough to make me want to renew my subscription.
Give it 3 months they'll all be back hopefully they will run out of money so much that they agree to do nights
I'm not sure how many girls have a following that is commited to paying £10 a month just for the odd pic and the privilege of being able to get 'better content' for a further charge.
Then there's the punters. Lets say a 'fan' has 5 favourite girls who he might watch on TV, call and cam with occasionally. Is the same fan gonna consistently pay £10 a month (plus extras for the naughty stuff) for 5 subscriptions to his 5 favourite girls?
Not having a dig at anyone, just a few thoughts.
Paying £50 per month to see "exclusive never before seen" pictures and videos of your 5 favourite presenters on OF might actually be not that bad.
When compared to the equivalent cost of doing the same on calls and cams with your 5 favourite presenters every month.
A 10 minute call with your 5 favourite presenters in one day might cost just over £100.
A 10 minute cam show with your 5 favourite presenters in one day might cost just over £250.
Our addiction isn't cheap no matter which platform we pay for it on LOL
Yeah but can you really compare looking at a picture or video to actually stroking while calling and/or camming to an actual glamour model standard of babe? Interacting is the channels USP if u just want pics theres plenty more. The whole situation re onlyfans is so retarded, a more effective way to combat it would surely be for S66 to book more shoots with girls making their own site better value or do on version like BS. Why bother anyway though? Any form of publicity is probably just gonna encourage guys to actually call in
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - jobuddy18uk - 27-10-2018 15:22
(27-10-2018 14:57 )goatman222 Wrote:(27-10-2018 14:44 )elgar1uk Wrote:(27-10-2018 14:21 )goatman222 Wrote: Clare is studio 66 much like ashley emma is babestation
Ashley Emma's worked on other channels. You can't say the same about Clare.
Yeah i know ashley was on elite tv first but she is their main woman shes the face of bs...i mean you have lori and dannii (gone now) who could be considered but lets be honest ashley is the star of the show
Also ashley emma ist babestation, if it was anyone itd be lori. call both and compare - lori any fucking day
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - 830ResAtDorsia - 27-10-2018 15:38
(27-10-2018 14:38 )babelover48 Wrote: I think the whole saga would not have happened if S66 weren't so slow in reacting. I only subscribe to Mikaela's page that is all
This is true. S66 has been so complacent in every way the past year, maybe longer. Should've addressed this many months ago, just like most of their other issues that get ignored.
And they may have won this one, but they're still failing to adapt. They need some other way to offer content as the 1 minute videos and galleries of 4-8 pics on the site just ain't cuttin it. BS has BSFans so maybe there's something like that in the works, but I'd like to see S66 go the Manyvids route. Either that or uploading much better videos to the website - why do the photoshoots in the first place if the end result is just gonna be 1-2 minutes of the same boring poses every time?
Most of the OF stuff is shit, so no great loss that the remainers can't use it any more. Hopefully now they'll actually start doing good shows again.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - jobuddy18uk - 27-10-2018 16:25
The older videos they did in the elite days were way better than now, especially the ones with dirty chat. Think an additional benefit of those was that actually hearing the girls talk gives u a taster of what they might be like on phone. The new vids they do are also kinda over produced in my opinion - if im trying to have a wank i dont need the camera flipping about every 2 fucking seconds
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - 830ResAtDorsia - 27-10-2018 16:38
Agreed, actually worth subscribing to (if they weren't so easy to find uploaded elsewhere) and the updates were twice as often back then iirc.
The new vids have nice photography and locations, but that's about it. They're boring, overly edited, way too short (and most of them are slowed down), and some don't even have any nudity. Saskia's first vid wasn't even topless, for a girl that sells b/g, g/g, anal masturbation, etc. on her MV page.
Everything's just way too tame to want to spend any money on, just like the majority of the Onlyfans pages are as well.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - ShandyHand - 27-10-2018 18:19
(27-10-2018 15:20 )jobuddy18uk Wrote: Yeah but can you really compare looking at a picture or video to actually stroking while calling and/or camming to an actual glamour model standard of babe? Interacting is the channels USP if u just want pics theres plenty more. The whole situation re onlyfans is so retarded, a more effective way to combat it would surely be for S66 to book more shoots with girls making their own site better value or do on version like BS. Why bother anyway though? Any form of publicity is probably just gonna encourage guys to actually call in
How many more times... because it's not just about outside work pictures. OF has turned into a place where babes can offer babeshow type services without the encumbrance of involving an operator: Pricey, content heavy, videos (which a babe will enhance the value of by doing less such content while with her operator) and increasingly different modes of personal interaction (the babeshow's USP) are promoted from within the platform cutting out the middle man babeshows.
To make matters worse babes have been ramping up the amount of time and effort they put into advertising this independent competing platform whilst on the shows themselves, as well as using their place of work as a venue to create competiting content and enhance interactive relationships that they then usurp and take off-site.
This is sharks fighting sharks here, but the question is which is more valuable to us. Are we fans of certain babes or of the thing that has put multiples of them in our front rooms with a certain form over the years?