+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150)
+--- Thread: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=50236)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 03-09-2017 20:42
^ Indeed that was partly my point (I probably clouded it with other guff as usual!
)... Intellectually the 'why' was rhetorical question. I think it's pretty clear to most observers by now what the operators are about with their changes and the reasons behind them. We have seen enough evidence in that direction. No my question was more an expression of the idea that when consumers are asked to pay for something that was previously perceived as free there is usually an expectation that the product will improve in some way as a justification. The perves, for all their faults, were at least something new. Can anyone say anything connected with the shows has become more erotic as a result of the most recent changes from BS? I don't think so. Isn't it strictly more of what was on offer elsewhere already but in a different packet?
As you say all they have done is further weakened the ways to get interested in the first place by balderising the TV shows some more.
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 04-09-2017 14:57
(03-09-2017 11:55 )M-L-L Wrote: They're apparently called Paris and Ema now.
From what I saw, these shows last night were of a level that would have been considered risque for the regular TV 2-4-1 nightshows 3 years or so ago, when contact between performers was deemed out of bounds, but wouldn't fit the expectations of people paying for encrypted content. It was certainly very conservatively filmed, with camera angles chosen that at very few points looked like remotely scaring the horses.
i think you are being harsh on these two, what you have to remember is that they are not pro porn stars,
having talked to Rick they are amatures both have normal 9-5 office jobs, they just come down bsx and get naughty every now and then, thats why they are not on twitter and there is no other content on the web,
they are just two normal girls having fun together and thats why it looks different but i think its a good thing, nice to have some variety on BSX,
shame i was away last weekend as what i saw i enjoyed
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 04-09-2017 17:58
(03-09-2017 20:42 )ShandyHand Wrote: ^
No my question was more an expression of the idea that when consumers are asked to pay for something that was previously perceived as free there is usually an expectation that the product will improve in some way as a justification.
I don't disagree the TV shows have got poorer, but I'm not sure about the analogy that things that used to be "free" improve when they become monetised, I am struggling to think of any concrete examples. Only if there is intense competition does this drive down prices ? and this can be counter productive as there will generally be a threshold below which any service cannot be delivered satisfactorily and therefore the quality suffers and becomes poor value for money. As anyone who has ever tried to get any complaint resolved through a service-provider's call centre will probably be able to testify.
I think probably things/services that were considered "free" were actually subsidised by hidden charges elsewhere, or by manipulating prices so that things appear to be cheaper or free against a false baseline; or probably more commonly these days for subscription services by fleecing customers too busy/time poor to spend days of their lives "cost-comparisoning" everything under the sun and switching providers every few months to give temporary discount deals to new customers, who will probably find some small print somewhere proves their deal is timelimited and actually crap in the long run, or in the case of things like insurance if they ever actually have to claim they find there is so much wiggle room on the providers' side that they are not covered at all.
A lot of public services that used to be considered "free" (ie taxpayer funded) have been cut altogether, with the assumption that if people really need those services they will pay for them.
But this is getting way off topic, apologies
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 04-09-2017 18:03
(04-09-2017 14:57 )winsaw Wrote: i think you are being harsh on these two
That was not my intention, all I was suggesting was that some people paying specifically for that show without knowing these performers and with the expectation of seeing more than is usual on TV may possibly have felt short-changed.
It wasn't a criticism aimed at these specific performers, but again was an example I thought of the more general issue with bsx that many have been saying here in the past that the shows are too inconsistent in terms of what some people might expect from encrypted/pay-per-view content.
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 05-09-2017 09:32
At the risk of prolonging the off-topic posts...
@M-L-L: Software is a decent example I think, If a formerly free version is monetised isn't there an onus for it to do something more than it did before there. More pertinently perhaps, the resentment some are feeling with the shows right now is akin to that when a previously fta sport goes over to pay. There better be a step up in how it's done is the typical audience response. I don't think the shows are addressing that.
I also wanted to comment on your earlier remarks re. this forum (warning some of this is quite speculative)... IMO, the changes in BS and 66s business model are, quite apparently, leading to changes in the shows' general fan base. Interest on this forum feels down. Names have and are continuing to disappear from the 'latest posts' section. The natural supposition is that the changes and apparent downturn in interest are related - that the numbers of parties taking an active pursuit of their passion is lower here for that reason.
To me, this perhaps hints at the fact that this forum had, for some (many?), become a way of enjoying the shows more satisfactorily without directly contributing to their continuation. I think others have expressed a feeling that an unrepresentatively large proportion of so-called freeloaders had found themselves a home here. (Unrepresentative in that the freeloader to callers ratio of those that didn't come here would likely be more weighted to the latter I feel.) If true, what would then be the result when, as they are surely doing now, the operators simply provide less reason to be a "freeloader"?!
Now, some in the industry are probably more than content to see the back of guys that they see as an irritant and a completely undesirable portion of the fan base. Nevertheless this ignores a basic tentant of how their own business functions I feel. Simply put: They need a crowd to be interested in order for the requisite number of paying customers to be found within them. Without the large crowd why should the percentage of actual payers be radically different? Something is needed to attract your crowd in the first place.
That crowd also help to sustain the industry with their contributions to places like this. Some may not like the fact but the industry would be a lesser one without such associated support.
IMO, BS in particular are in danger of throwing the baby out with the bath water atm. They are causing some little disillusionment (we can only judge by what we see on places like this despite the caveats above on who might make up the majority here). That can't ALL simply be dismissed as being the whingeing of uncontributing freeloaders.
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 07-09-2017 06:19
^ It's worth pointing out that some (maybe many) of the current 'freeloaders' they want rid of are actually ex-callers, i.e. customers they already had, and could have kept, if they hadn't fucked them over in pursuit of a 'fast buck'.
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - cwpussylover - 07-09-2017 09:58
(07-09-2017 06:19 )The Silent Majority Wrote: ^ It's worth pointing out that some (maybe many) of the current 'freeloaders' they want rid of are actually ex-callers, i.e. customers they already had, and could have kept, if they hadn't fucked them over in pursuit of a 'fast buck'.
yep havent spent a penny since they ended unleashed...used to be £100 a month.....
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - barracuda - 09-09-2017 01:25
Some nice shows from Brook Little tonight. She saved the best until last I think, as I liked the last set on the stairway, but all 4 of the shows were good.
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - aaron - 10-09-2017 00:08
Yes I greatly liked the Brook Little night on Friday. I missed the last night she did a month ago, so it was good to catch her this time.
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion - dagnabbit - 10-09-2017 00:40
re tonights BABE show
spotty arse, stained teeth and greasy hair
ffs this is scraping the bottom of the barrel