+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - eccles - 13-10-2012 00:53
Lets hope Victoria is wearing her trademark thong
There is nice content, but it isnt a patch on what it was or could be. Who is it hurting or offending? And why is it OK for BBC2 to show a naked man running around willy hanging out in a film, but not OK to show a nekked woman?
I am sick of hearing people say "But theres the internet for porn". Its not the same. They wouldnt say that if live football was banned and all you could see were random goals between unknown teams in 5 minute clips. Or if action films had every punch edited out along with guns being fired.
Dont kid yourselves its the Christians who are opposed to sex on TV. Their attitude is that they dont like it but accept its a part of modern society. Gambling channels and payday loans should bother them far more from a religious or social welfare perspective, as well as psychic channels and text in "competitions". And as for TV channels promoting other religions...
Its not parents either, leastwise not at midnight.
So why is sex the only area where 30 year old restrictions are still in place? It is not uniquely harmful and TV is not meant to be some kind of safe zone where there is nothing you would be uncomfortable watching with your mother. Violent films. Strong humour. Medical shows. Racism debates. Ross Kemp shows. But no sex.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - anchorman - 13-10-2012 01:07
(13-10-2012 00:53 )eccles Wrote: And why is it OK for BBC2 to show a naked man running around willy hanging out in a film, but not OK to show a nekked woman?
Why,because the bbc are in bed with jimmy savile and we all know what their into
As for tonight,im watching about a half hour and its tame all round
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Digital Dave - 13-10-2012 01:07
The thing is sex is allowed, in large quantities, depending on context.
The mystery to me is why sexual content is not allowed on channels where the aim of the channel is sexual arousal. You can make a programme about sexual arousal and have naked genitals as far as the eye can see, but if the programme's main intent is to arouse then forget it.
There's no logical or philosophical argument that can support this distinction, so the only possible justification is some sort of twisted religious fundamentalism, completely out of step with modern society.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 13-10-2012 08:25
agree its ridiculous the babeshows are as they are compared to mainstream tv and i cant see it changing im afraid for a good while yet. as for last night, given that, i thought last night wasnt bad at all on pretty much all the channels
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-10-2012 14:29
Getting back to eccles and digital daves point of view on what is allowed on mainstream telly as opposed to the babe channels, although I fully agree with you on principle because we have had many a long and winded discussion on the ofcom thread about this, I can't help but think that we are diverting our attentions somewhat of the subject in hand.
As I predicted last night based on the line ups for the shows and also the current OTT self censorship down to fear of ofcom that I was pretty much spot on with my predictions of what lay ahead for last nights fare.
I also got no pleasure out of predicting such a gloomy forecast. Friday night and Saturday in the past you were guaranteed a good nights viewings but that's all changed, out in force last night we had the safety first models brigade.
To sum up last night was a dire and absymal nights viewing allround, I wouldn't give one single model or channel pass marks, it was hidious. I've seen Monday night shows in the past more entertaining.
As a newcomer to capping, I felt absolutely no compulsion to cap any of them, they in my opinion were not worthy of any kind of attention.
Total shitfest from the beginning to the end.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Fernandez Esperenda - 17-10-2012 11:51
Time for me to take a break from the channels and forum, think we all need to realise that the channels are there for one purpose only and need to stop being made into some kind of soap opera, there are no plotlines with these channels, they are not made for back to back viewing, thats why most people on here are unhappy, i for one am bored to death of the channels atm so im giving them a long break
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 17-10-2012 14:25
i have an idea to put forward to the channels , why dont one of them start another channel up (rlc did recently without any hiccups) and call it ALMOST , employ camilla, lori , danni ,bailey etc all the girls that go that little bit further than the rest(ok no pussy but as near as),then the rest can be as tame as they want, at the very least we will see girls doing their thing and entertaining the masses who are begging for a decent nights adult viewing,by the way if one of them does take up the idea i will sue for copyright unless i am given a back stage pass with a chair next to the cameraman
,what do you think ?
[split] Tonight I'm lovin'.... - IvIaxed Stats 76 - 23-10-2012 21:03
the last luck I just had thru the channels give me feeling of an end of an era.
it was awsome thou wasn't it.pure fun.loved every minuites watching the babes go wild an loving it too haha. happy times ; )
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - jonnyalpha - 24-10-2012 13:29
(17-10-2012 11:51 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote: Time for me to take a break from the channels and forum, think we all need to realise that the channels are there for one purpose only and need to stop being made into some kind of soap opera, there are no plotlines with these channels, they are not made for back to back viewing, thats why most people on here are unhappy, i for one am bored to death of the channels atm so im giving them a long break
I know the feeling I spent most of my time now on webshows or webcams at least I can see what I want there.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 25-10-2012 19:25
Yes I have to admit the channels these days have got so formulatic that they do look like they are on their last legs.
I've been up early all this week, I remember in the past I would stay up late just to see my favourites spring into action. IE - Bailey Cream, Lucy Summer's, Caty Cole (back when she was a legend) and co almost deliver to the punters what we all wanted to see.
Ofcom and over cautious producers have all but killed off any suspence that remained, even when the models go naked, it's normally so dull and lifeless it quickly becomes a non event.
Static models and static positions, topless only with more movement is even more boring.
Back to the recent naked stints, if you could imagine for one second, you are an artist and you are drawing the nude figure, it's nice to look at but in terms of being erotic, it ain't.
With use of the handthong all but killed off it's taken away with the risk element which was what made it all so special.
A number of models down the years were able to achieve this, to give the impression that you might see a slip of the hand but without actually doing it. It is a fantastic illusion when it's done properly.
I also liked the idea that it looked like they were giving the snatch a really good seeing to
It was in many ways more exciting to watch than just plain old vagina for all to see.As the eternal optimistic in me all my hopes are geared up for 2013 and I hope for a much better output and change in fortunes, I can recall 2008 in particular being a very bad year for the babe channels with 2009 fairing much better leading up to the high of the summer of 2010 when arguably they were at their strongest.