The UK Babe Channels Forum
Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)



RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - arron88 - 16-12-2012 00:41

(15-12-2012 08:50 )ukbicur Wrote:  Not sure why these shows are not on tv anymore.
Babeshows are partly to blame.


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - billyboy1963 - 16-12-2012 14:16

(16-12-2012 00:41 )arron88 Wrote:  
(15-12-2012 08:50 )ukbicur Wrote:  Not sure why these shows are not on tv anymore.
Babeshows are partly to blame.

Why? - Please explain your reasoning


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 16-12-2012 15:05

No offence Stan but UK uncovered has got to be the biggest pile of shit I've ever seen. 3 and a half hours of pure shit. The only sort of mainstream nudity I've seen lately has come from that pretentious gobshite Spencer Tunnick which also is hardly anything of a turn on. Apart from that endless repeats of sexcentra and sin city all of which I've all seen countless times but in terms of anything new, absolutely nothing. I'd go as far to say the sex documentry era has all but dried up completely. It's as dry as a nun's fanny.


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 18-12-2012 00:52

Sorry but UK Uncovered has been a big dissapointment. Three hours of exactly the same content with a few quick boob flashes. But its good that they are showing it. Even better if someone commisioned new material instead of fishing out old stuff.


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 18-12-2012 00:59

Last in a series comparing TV prudery with the filth in some papers.

"DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Failure to block porn betrays our children" screams a tabloid today.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2249164/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-Failure-block-porn-betrays-children.html

The same papers internet site had a sidebar headlined
'I celebrate nudity every day': Boardwalk Empire star Paz De La Huerta goes naked for Playboy magazine
The first image might be unsuitable for daytime TV even on an adult channel as it features a naked woman with her legs open provocatively, even if none of the naughty bits are visible.
The second image is also a nude shot, this time from behind and showing full buttocks.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2249642/Boardwalk-Empire-star-Paz-De-La-Huerta-goes-naked-Playboy-magazine.html


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 18-12-2012 02:05

^ Weird indeed, and very creepy picture!!!!


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 21-12-2012 00:05

Sex education show on 138 now, with lots of uncensored penises and some vaginas! YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 23-12-2012 22:05

Sky Arts 1 Now-11:45 "Forever Crazy" - Crazy Horse cabaret. 10 topless "beefeaters" parading to martial music already and its only been on 3 minutes.

Repeated Boxing Day at 11:30 when Gran will be asleep.

[edit] Merkin flash. And drumroll.


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 24-12-2012 12:24

(16-12-2012 15:05 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  No offence Stan but UK uncovered has got to be the biggest pile of shit I've ever seen. 3 and a half hours of pure shit. The only sort of mainstream nudity I've seen lately has come from that pretentious gobshite Spencer Tunnick which also is hardly anything of a turn on. Apart from that endless repeats of sexcentra and sin city all of which I've all seen countless times but in terms of anything new, absolutely nothing. I'd go as far to say the sex documentry era has all but dried up completely. It's as dry as a nun's fanny.

Would you please explain to me why you should think that a nun's fanny would be dry?


RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 24-12-2012 14:03

The difference between main stream and adult channels doesn't only mean nudity, but also the language that is used. I would like to give an example if I may from last nights TV. I was watching 'The Graham Norton Show', and one of his guests, "Billy Connolly", as per usual used the word "fuck" a couple of times to great amusement of the studio audience. It was midnight so what is wrong with a bit of strong language, "fuck all I would say". Norton finished so I thought before turning in I would see what the adult channels had to offer, as usual, nothing worthwhile. But while watching, a girl with more tattoos than David Beckham was announcing a message on the microphone. And like Billy Connolly, came out with the word "fuck". Just seconds after putting the mic down, she was told to pick it up again and apologise to the viewers for what she had just said. It makes my fucking blood boil that this sort of thing happens. And no, I am not blaming fucking Ofcom for this pointless censorship. But the greedy fucking programme makers. who are doing their utmost to sanitise the shows, so people will hand over even more hard earned money to pay to view channels. Does it not seem odd that they are allowed to use the strongest of language when advertising, with a little pussy rubbing thrown in. But one model can't say the word "fuck". I just find it totally wrong of these producers to treat their fans in the way they are doing. And for them to go along with the reasoning that it is all the fault of the watchdogs is beyond contempt. I for one in a recent survey on this forum voted for these channels to cease. That doesn't say I want shot of the adult channels.But in this format they have to fucking go. Surely out there in TV land, someone can come up with a fresh new idea.