(26-08-2012 08:21 )bytor Wrote:  I think you would find that yes, people would get bored, no matter who they put on if they are on every night. All that would happen if Gracie was on every night is she would become as unpopular with as many viewers as Lolly and Lori currently are. Over exposure is never healthy.

All they need to do is make sure they have 5 or 6 girls on each night over 3 channels. Each girl does two or three nights per week and they each take turns doing no more than an hour per session. Used to work well in years gone by and you hardly ever saw the long periods of phone waggling that you see these days. If nothing else it generates anticipation in the fans of the various girls (which may lead to calls) and stops the shows from becoming stale

Quote:"michellethorne.xxx ‏@_MichelleThorne 41min
they didn't put me on much last night though weird......."

(25-08-2012 21:56 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  That's irrelevant. The point is they thought they were too smart to fail in the first place.

(25-08-2012 21:56 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  No, the football analogy, as I described it, is good. There are many teams down the bottom end of the lower leagues who have no hope of winning anything but plod on regardless. TV soaps stand and fall on the quality of the storylines and script, not individual actors performances. Generally actors can't be chopped and changed once a character is cast and on-screen time depends on the storylines but babes on a bed and players on a pitch can both be subbed on the managers whim whether the fans like it or not.

(25-08-2012 14:58 )rj242 Wrote:  A lot of guys are going to watch the show tonight knowing it will be bad and will end up in here tomorrow complaining about how bad it was .....

(26-08-2012 09:03 )oldboy1047 Wrote:  rubbish night last night with lolly on bs1 all night and mica sharing a bed virtually all night

(26-08-2012 09:03 )oldboy1047 Wrote:  rubbish night last night with lolly on bs1 all night and mica sharing a bed virtually all night

(26-08-2012 08:50 )O Danny Boy Wrote:  You've got to hand it to Babestation, they sure know how to make a hot girl a complete turn off and a bore to watch. I wouldn't thought this 6 or 7 years ago when Lolly was one of my favourite back in college, now I avoid her like a plague. I don't think I've watched up to 10mins of Lolly in the last six or seven months (dead serious) .

Now they are doing the same to Lori who I thought when she made her switch from day to night as one of the best moments on Babestation but once again their ruining it for me. Lolly or Lori on, channel off for me.

(26-08-2012 10:39 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  also michelle thorne hardly on last night. yes she was on bsxtreme but even so she wasnt on main bs much. only remember her on main bs once. michelle herself found it weird she wasnt on much last night she tweeted this morning

Quote:"michellethorne.xxx ‏@_MichelleThorne 41min
they didn't put me on much last night though weird......."

(26-08-2012 11:04 )rj242 Wrote:  It is not irrelevant - if you know you have a safety net you take more risks which the banks did and regular businesses can not.

(26-08-2012 11:04 )rj242 Wrote:  Its not like football at all because of the nature of the fanbase - Did you see Arsenal fans suddenly supporting Man Utd because Van Persie moved - No because they support the team and not the player. Apart from a few special people on here how many people only watch and support one channel? The vast majority of people have a few girls who they fancy and will follow them across channels whining when their girl does not get enough time.

(25-08-2012 12:51 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  The football analogy is a good one. We all know the girls (players) are capable of better, even under the current restrictions, but the channels (teams) performance is dire yet there are quality babes (players) left underused on the subs bench. As with football it's the producers (manager) who are getting it in the neck from the fans. The only real difference is the fans are more loyal to the girls (players) than the channels and will happily follow their favs when they move, rather than stick with the channel (team).