+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 Daytime babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=312)
+----- Thread: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=9072)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - sweetsugar007 - 29-04-2012 22:51
Suppose its her right to protect her image but not being a fan of his woman at all i could not give two fucks.
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - stilettos - 29-04-2012 23:22
(29-04-2012 22:51 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: Suppose its her right to protect her image but not being a fan of his woman at all i could not give two fucks.So why bother to even reply to this post?
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - sweetsugar007 - 30-04-2012 03:58
Because i wanted to!
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - yesboss - 30-04-2012 10:12
(29-04-2012 22:41 )stilettos Wrote:(29-04-2012 22:35 )Money_Shot Wrote: Answers to what questions? :|
Read through this thread. The whole decision over no caps or vids is unfounded,gone on too long with no development outside of her appearance here,so quite frankly,needs reviewing...just sayin'
She did tweet a while ago that it was her decision to remove the caps n vids for "professional reasons" (or something along those lines...)
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - stilettos - 30-04-2012 10:23
(30-04-2012 10:12 )yesboss Wrote: She did tweet a while ago that it was her decision to remove the caps n vids for "professional reasons" (or something along those lines...)
Yes,but most of the girls here are 'professional'.and as shes the only glamour model in the whole world who forbids it, again i say, we need answers!
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - Ed Knoll - 01-05-2012 10:49
Well our girl looks great again today. Just an observation and may be I am wrong but since she has become Victoria Picton on Tweeter I noticed she seems to have covered up the boobies a bit more. May be I am wrong or it is just a coincidence. However I am a leg man and were still getting plenty of those mighty fine pins and the "look me up and down" camera poses so I am not complaining
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - zimbo78 - 01-05-2012 23:30
She is definitely married!
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - stilettos - 01-05-2012 23:43
(01-05-2012 23:30 )zimbo78 Wrote: She is definitely married!
Ok, so if thats the reason for no caps,vids or internet stuff, its pretty unprofessional. many girls here are or have been married. And guys should know what theyre getting in to if theyre not comfy with it. And if the girl wishes to honour that,she cant split the morality; #justsayin'!
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - Ed Knoll - 02-05-2012 00:36
Note sure if that is it. The name change is fairly recent and I do not know the change has got to do with anything with her getting or being married. I am fairly new to the babe channels but from reading the post you guys here have mentioned her not allowing vids. and caps for long time now. Certainly way before the name change.
If you look back at my posts I think it is fairly obvious what I think of Vikki, whatever the reasons behind the above debate.
PS Stilettos sorry I am using a avatar that is similar to yours mate. However I love high heels as well and tried lots of different downloadable avatars of all different styles stockings / short skirt etc but this one worked the best.
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - tee - 03-05-2012 10:37
If she's married and wants to keep her modesty. Maybe she's in wrong profession. Or maybe we are wrong. She's still attracting lot if calls compare to women who r wearing next to nothing. She's a very good on the phones. So I guess ppl enjoy her company.