+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: Babestation : Freeview vs Sky (/showthread.php?tid=13807)
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - aaron - 24-01-2010 11:52
(23-01-2010 21:33 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: The Gestapo (OFCOM) seem to have restricted the girls going fully naked to between midnight and 5.00am. As we know, ch99 broadcasts BS2 between 10.00pm and midnight, and ch96 BS1 5.00am - 5.30am - but they seem to have placed a complete ban on any nudity within those slots.
Where does it say that in the Broadcasting Code?
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - dave34 - 24-01-2010 15:35
one girl went naked after midnight on bs2 last
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - PersonaNonGrata - 24-01-2010 21:37
(24-01-2010 15:35 )dave34 Wrote: one girl went naked after midnight on bs2 last
After midnight, yes, but not before and not after 5.00am. It used to be allowed midnight to 5.30am (on both BS1 and BS2). That means we've lost a whole hour of full nudity.
BS2 5.00am - 5.30am has been removed from freeview, and BS1 5.00am - 5.30am is now topless only. It looks like SKY viewers have lost out too.
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - PersonaNonGrata - 24-01-2010 21:41
(24-01-2010 11:52 )aaron Wrote:(23-01-2010 21:33 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: The Gestapo (OFCOM) seem to have restricted the girls going fully naked to between midnight and 5.00am. As we know, ch99 broadcasts BS2 between 10.00pm and midnight, and ch96 BS1 5.00am - 5.30am - but they seem to have placed a complete ban on any nudity within those slots.
Where does it say that in the Broadcasting Code?
I don't know what the broadcasting code says, it's just what I've observed.
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - admiral decker - 25-01-2010 00:47
(24-01-2010 11:52 )aaron Wrote: [quote='PersonaNonGrata' pid='333577' dateline='1264278832']
The Gestapo (OFCOM) seem to have restricted the girls going fully naked to between midnight and 5.00am.
Well Jada's just been fully naked from 10:30 to 11:30 and that isn't between midnight and 5.00am.
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - aaron - 25-01-2010 11:41
Yes I am a witness to this. Wasn't Lori naked on another channel at the same time? Or was that later?
[split] Who's on Babestation or Partyland tonight? - Mastes1 - 07-07-2010 23:12
You guys with Sky are lucky, its shit for us freeview viewers.
RE: [Split] Who's on Babestation or Partyland tonight? - mr mystery - 07-07-2010 23:44
(07-07-2010 23:12 )Mastes1 Wrote: You guys with Sky are lucky, its shit for us freeview viewers.I have to agree with you there , i am lucky enough to have Sky and i got to see Camilla totally naked tonight just after 10pm on BS1 , us Sky viewers used to have to wait till after 12 am before we could see naked girls on BS1 because of OFCOM's discrimination towards freeview and their no nudity rule before 12am on freeview .
RE: Who's on Babestation or Partyland tonight? - vila - 08-07-2010 00:11
(07-07-2010 23:44 )mr mystery Wrote:(07-07-2010 23:12 )Mastes1 Wrote: You guys with Sky are lucky, its shit for us freeview viewers.I have to agree with you there , i am lucky enough to have Sky and i got to see Camilla totally naked tonight just after 10pm on BS1 , us Sky viewers used to have to wait till after 12 am before we could see naked girls on BS1 because of OFCOM's discrimination towards freeview and their no nudity rule before 12am on freeview .
Ofcom's Participation TV Consultation document clearly stated that BS's Freeview channels are not subject to the Broadcasting Code as they are licensed in Holland, not the UK.
What evidence is there that Ofcom are responsible for BS's continuing anti-Freeview discrimination? (Which isn't limited to the nudity issue.)
RE: Who's on Babestation or Partyland tonight? - mr mystery - 08-07-2010 01:12
(08-07-2010 00:11 )vila Wrote:I have not see any evidence that OFCOM are responsible for the freeview discrimination , i just took it for granted that they were responsible , if it is not them it must be the licence granted in Holland that must be at fault , maybe nudity is not allowed till after midnight on a Dutch 16 cert freeview licence , can't see Cellcast discriminating against Freeview unless they are ordered to by the powers that be , then again they have just sold the 10-11 BS1 hour that they used to have on channel 96 "AL Jazeera"tv freeview channel89 so anything is possible .(07-07-2010 23:44 )mr mystery Wrote:(07-07-2010 23:12 )Mastes1 Wrote: You guys with Sky are lucky, its shit for us freeview viewers.I have to agree with you there , i am lucky enough to have Sky and i got to see Camilla totally naked tonight just after 10pm on BS1 , us Sky viewers used to have to wait till after 12 am before we could see naked girls on BS1 because of OFCOM's discrimination towards freeview and their no nudity rule before 12am on freeview .
Ofcom's Participation TV Consultation document clearly stated that BS's Freeview channels are not subject to the Broadcasting Code as they are licensed in Holland, not the UK.
What evidence is there that Ofcom are responsible for BS's continuing anti-Freeview discrimination? (Which isn't limited to the nudity issue.)