+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bluebird TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=165)
+---- Thread: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=19210)
RE: Delta Joins Bluebird - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 27-04-2010 08:53
(26-04-2010 13:52 )chrislatimer Wrote: i agree with the contradictory posts point by the way.
Thank you
(26-04-2010 13:52 )chrislatimer Wrote: what i meant by shady is, that you only have that agreement with cellcast, if you would of even done it with bangbabes as well it would of been a bit less shady in my opinion.
Chris: We can only enter into agreement with people who are willing to enter into agreements with us.
(26-04-2010 13:52 )chrislatimer Wrote: and just my own personal point, i didnt really like it when all the bangbabes girls went to elite, but i dont know as much as others about that, but i beilive jamie ran bangbabes, so its a different scenerio to this present one.
Jamie didn't own BB. He just worked there as a producer.
(26-04-2010 13:52 )chrislatimer Wrote: but am glad your buying paradiso if it transpires as they have poor production qualitys, which is a shame as they have some nice girls
Yes, it's a shame as they didn't have the resources to support some good talent they had there.
We appreciate you listening and entering constructive dialogue. Thank you.
RE: Bluebird TV - southlondonphil - 27-04-2010 09:37
I'm sorry to be negative, but the appearance of Bluebird TV doesn't look very helpful to the viewer. Those who like Babeworld will be disappointed, those who like Live 960 will be disappointed and those who like Club Paradiso will be disappointed. It's not as though Bluebird are adding to the available channels, as by taking over others they are reducing the choices to the consumer. Replacing 3 channels with Bluebird simply means less customer choice.
RE: Bluebird TV - cosmonaut - 27-04-2010 10:32
I agree Phil, it would be better if they were an entirely new channel rather than a replacement for several other channels.
RE: Bluebird TV - tsurugi - 27-04-2010 13:58
Warning pro bluebird post
In my opinion 960 and CP are awful. They only have a handful of decent girls between them courtney,ashleigh and i struggle to think of anymore.
Surely it will be a good thing that when bluebird get the channels up and running there will be a vast improvement in production value, picture quality and a much better quality of girl on show.
I liked babeworld but sometimes the girls can be a little too static so hopefully that won't be a problem under the bluebird regime.
RE: Bluebird TV - trevor format - 27-04-2010 23:04
(27-04-2010 13:58 )tsurugi Wrote: Surely it will be a good thing that when bluebird get the channels up and running there will be a vast improvement in production value, picture quality and a much better quality of girl on show.
But there will still be less choice though, since Bluebird getting up and running can apparently only happen if other channels disappear. I think this is the point being made, that Bluebird are not adding to the channels, they are causing 3 channels to be lost to only gain 1. They will say they are running a number of channels, but they will be produced the same, so the consumer ends up with less choice.
RE: Bluebird TV - Topman 47 - 27-04-2010 23:28
I have digested the comments made to date and have to relate to comparisons with football in that the wealthy clubs and tv babe channels will always procure the players / ladies they require to meet their fanbase expectation.
Lower league clubs generally only survive by finding talent and selling to larger welathy clubs, unfortunately the smaller tv channels do and will unearth new talent but do not receive the requiste transfer fee, other than selling their business hopefully for them at profit.
The girls subject to their contracts have the right to ply their trade to earn more money or move to another channel if they feel the environment may prove better, as we all do in the workplace.
The larger channnels do obviously have better equipment and lighting and although I personally enjoy Club Paradiso (because of Courtney, Summer Rae and Ashleigh), their possible imminent takeover by Bluebird should improve the quality of viewing.
As long as we get a choice of channels to watch for free, as I refuse to pay to watch (I can watch plenty of porn for free on the net), i am looking forward to an improved quality in both presentation and production.
I sincerely hope some of the smaller channels do survive and keep unearthing the talent but the girls should not be treated in the manner that they were at Hotel Voyeur.
I shall follow my favourite babes whichever station they are on and no doubt spend my monthly allowance on phoning them. Perhaps Mr. Bluebird, you will reduce the cost per minute for mobiles well I can always live in hope
RE: Bluebird TV - biker200 - 28-04-2010 00:12
Im not going pre-emptive on a channel yet to broadcast but would hope that if they replace Babeworld they keep SJ and Ani employed.
RE: Bluebird TV - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 28-04-2010 03:22
(28-04-2010 00:12 )biker200 Wrote: Im not going pre-emptive on a channel yet to broadcast but would hope that if they replace Babeworld they keep SJ and Ani employed.
We have asked the girls - up to them whether they come
RE: Bluebird TV - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 28-04-2010 03:24
(27-04-2010 09:37 )southlondonphil Wrote: I'm sorry to be negative, but the appearance of Bluebird TV doesn't look very helpful to the viewer. Those who like Babeworld will be disappointed, those who like Live 960 will be disappointed and those who like Club Paradiso will be disappointed. It's not as though Bluebird are adding to the available channels, as by taking over others they are reducing the choices to the consumer. Replacing 3 channels with Bluebird simply means less customer choice.
We will in fact have a number of entirely new channels, in addition to the ones replacing Babeworld, 960 and Paradiso. We will also be on Freeview, which Babeworld and Paradiso are not.
Thanks
RE: Bluebird TV - aaron - 28-04-2010 07:22
Even if there is more choice for those watching on freeview there will still be less choice for those watching on Sky.