Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255) +----- Forum: Former Studio 66 babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=311) +----- Thread: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=57917) |
RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 08-12-2013 11:44 (08-12-2013 07:15 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Well I've just logged into the forum after having to work last night but I do have a smart phone so I was able to check out the stream every now and again and from what I seen she was truly atrocious. IM NOT A STUDIO66 FANBOY!!!!!!!!!! if you can be bothered to look in the tonight im loving thread, there is just ONE studio66 BABE!!!!!!! on my list. the others being 2 on babestation, 2 on storm and one on rlc also you say you have the facts to say jesse was bad and did the "worst nightshow of all time" if so can we see them please, in particular jesse's call stats because that will i think ultimately decide whether or not she has a bad night or not and will also probably decide if jesse does more guest stints on s66 next year and your request that s66 don't have her on again wont make a blind bit of difference, also think she isn't an insult to the "home grown talent" s66 has as for why I was the only one to say why jesse was good the past 2 nights who knows? I think jesse has been good and if others don't think that she has been good then fair enough. not every forum member likes the same babes overall I think jesse has been good on s66 so far (last night and Friday night), I will accept she hasn't been as good as other guest us adult stars s66/elitetv has had on like Siri, Alexis Texas, Tanya Tate and Sophie Dee, but she has not been as bad as some forum members have said she has been also I haven't defended s66 in this thread. all I said was it was unfair jesse was getting comments about her either not going topless or a lack of topless action when jordana on rlc/playboy was doing a non-topless dominatrix show last night. and wasn't getting comments about her not going topless at the moment I do think Jesse will be back next year because last night and Friday night it looked to me she was busy on the phones and haven't seen anything in general to say jesse shouldn't be back after her final s66 show tomorrow RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 08-12-2013 12:35 Just my opinion but the phone stats are somewhat irrelevant as this is a forum where people share opinions on what THEY are viewing from THEIR perspective on the 'UK babe channels'. The shows will see to all that business. Conspiracy theory: There's no body on the end of the phone sometimes it's just a ploy to get the listeners phoning in. That could be way off the mark and untrue but it's food for thought RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - dazzab - 08-12-2013 12:52 Yes Jesse Jane was a big let down i cant fault her as an adult performer she is brilliant. But im sorry S66 made a mistake bringing her here which is a shame because i was looking forward to her. Siri was something else and the sooner she is back the better. I would also like to make a suggestion to S66 that maybe they cast there net a bit further than just USA girls, ive sen many a nice European girl in America so why is no one checking them out. For example the likes of Alice Romain i could name quite a few so if you wanna pm me i would be happy to help. RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 08-12-2013 13:43 Rammy I knew you'd wheel out the phone stats. Yes you have defended Studio 66 in this thread. You defended them for their decision to bring over pornstars from the US, you said that 'people like them and if they didn't, they (Studio 66) wouldn't bring them over'. That is a defence isn't it? Come on Rammy, stop backtracking. Just want to say, and this is my final word for now - you are allowed to be a fan of Studio 66 mate, there's nothing wrong with that. So why do you keep saying you're not a fanboy? You admit to it often enough when the forum awards nominees are listed each year... RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 08-12-2013 14:45 Rammy you have to realize that on this forum our perspective is that of a viewer and not a statistician. We don't have access to call stats and we cannot tell who is being filthy on the phone with her and who isn't. I am not sitting here as (1) A bean counter (2) a lip reader of the on screen babe or (3) a potential buyer of winter warmer clothing I watch as a viewer who wants some hot and horny nightshow entertainment plain and simple. What I saw last night was not at all exciting or stimulating no matter what the stats say. As the old saying goes 'Lies, damned lies and statistics' . RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Voiceofreason - 08-12-2013 16:35 The point Rammy is making is Jesse was brought over to get the callers ringing & it looks like she succeeded & that's all 66 care about, they have no interest in non callers with their cocks in their hands. Never seems to sink in on here. RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 08-12-2013 17:31 (08-12-2013 16:35 )Voiceofreason Wrote: The point Rammy is making is Jesse was brought over to get the callers ringing & it looks like she succeeded & that's all 66 care about, they have no interest in non callers with their cocks in their hands. Then we might as well wind up the forum. No point in commenting on how sexy the babes are, or what turns us on or off with them. Only talk about their call stats, like that's got anything to do with us. Of course we know call stats & revenue are all the channels primarily care about, and they're fully entitled to make decisions based them. I've said it myself before. But that's not what I signed on here to talk about it Especially when used as a desperate last line of defense for a babe's performance. RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 08-12-2013 17:32 (08-12-2013 16:35 )Voiceofreason Wrote: The point Rammy is making is Jesse was brought over to get the callers ringing & it looks like she succeeded & that's all 66 care about, they have no interest in non callers with their cocks in their hands. I think people are well aware what he's pointing out mate but that isn't the issue. My point is that this thread is for discussing her performances NOT studio66's phone stat performances that have zero effect on what we're seeing. Yes yes she was on the phone all night wup de fekkin do It was still a below average performance and that's all anybody gives a shit about. RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 08-12-2013 18:21 (08-12-2013 16:35 )Voiceofreason Wrote: The point Rammy is making is Jesse was brought over to get the callers ringing & it looks like she succeeded & that's all 66 care about, they have no interest in non callers with their cocks in their hands. That's exactly it voiceofreason, the most important thing for s66 and Jesse is that she is bringing in the calls. Also Jesse will get new people watching s66 that have never watched before and hopefully they will then call the regular s66 night babes after Jesse goes back to us I wasn't making it as a last line of defence for Jesse. I have said earlier if people think jesse's shows have been poor then fair enough, myself think Jesse has been good her 2 nightshows so far and hope she finishes her guest stint with another good show tomorrow RE: Jesse Jane - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 08-12-2013 18:38 As they say at Burger King "Have it your way" I do hope she improves so we can then fill this thread with praise. It works both ways. |