(10-06-2015 07:45 )hairbald Wrote:  Small Claims court is the way to go on this. Basically its all online and the threat to person is simple - a CCJ which her ability to get credit/mortgages is impaired even if you don't get the money back. Getting the initial letter is usually enough

https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/overview

As for her reaction, she started to get a whole lot more cooperative now that you've gone public. Funny that

Good luck

(10-06-2015 09:03 )Bandwagon Wrote:  I have to agree with Goodfella, chalk this down to experience and move on.
I don't think anybody (barring Rammy) would particularly condone what has happened, but you aren't the first and unfortunately won't be the last.
Gina, her employers, and everybody else in this business are in it for the cash, their methods have no bounds or indeed any conscience of extracting this in any way possible

(10-06-2015 10:38 )SOCATOA Wrote:  On a positive side, this episode has brought this form of selling, on to a forum, where the service provided can be reviewed. Whether this girl would have responded if this hadnt been highlighted is anyones guess. If it helps punters to get a better service, then has been well worth the debate

(10-06-2015 07:48 )babelover48 Wrote:  If it had happened onSt66's watch it probably would have been a concern but I think I'm sure Gina was doing her best to resolve things for you

(10-06-2015 11:59 )tee Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 23:18 )fragels1986 Wrote:  ^It looks very clear to me you were on her side in your last message.....telling me I was swearing etc....You have no evidence of this, whereas I have the full conversation. Its a very simple situation to be resolved, All she needs to do is pay me back on paypal. Takes 2 minutes, she clearly does not want to resolve this as she has blocked me on twitter straight after I gave her my paypal details, which she should have already. I dont want this to continue, if you want to help tell her I sent her an email.

Dude you can even contact police. You have the evidence. It's an online fraud. These scamming models need to be thought a lesson. So in future they'll be aware

(10-06-2015 09:36 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  ^^^
I'm not condoning what Gina has apparently done here. If she has done what fragels is claiming she has, then she is completely out of order & should give fragels what he gave the money for. But gina on her Twitter said she had sent what fragels asked for, it got lost in the post & she's trying to get something sorted out to resolve this, including asking for advice on Twitter. Have this morning seen the tweets where Gina has laughed & joked about this with one of her followers and think this isn't on at all.

Try and take Gina to small claims court, if you can. If you can't probably as goodfella3041 has said, take it as a lesson learned and move on, taking comfort in the fact you have painted Gina in a poor light and cost her a lot more than the money you gave her.

I have had a similar situation myself. For my 21st birthday I booked to go on what would have been a trip of a lifetime to go to America watching NHL Ice Hockey which cost around £800. About a day and a half before I was due to depart I got a phonecall from the police saying that someone within the company had ran off with all the money that people including me had paid to go on this trip and the trip wasn't happening. It was all set to go to court but just as it was the person that ran off with the money died and the case couldn't continue.

In the end all I got in compensation was season tickets for me and my dad to watch Manchester Storm (worth around £400-500) as it was through Manchester Storm I booked the trip through and they offered this as a goodwill gesture. Couldn't get anything from the company as it turned out they wasn't actually covered by abta & atol despite the leaflets & brochures all saying they were. The person had made up the abta & atol information so that people would be convinced they were protected & send the money which he would secretly pocket

(10-06-2015 18:08 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^ tweet him and tell him then.

(10-06-2015 09:45 )Trickster Wrote:  In a case like this i don't think it has anything to do with Studio66tv what ever a person does out of work is nothing to do with the company they work for. Unless it's something major where the person needs to be let go ect.

Unfortunately it's just the way some of the girls work you have the genuine ones and the ones who are out to make a few quid easily by scamming some1 if it isn't the Babe-channel girls it's the ones who WEBCAM! ( Jessica Jensen is a prime example)

Basically it's just a case of outing them making people aware so it don't happen to them plus i'm sure the girl in question Gina will have a few friends on her twitter i.e girls will think that's a low blow. Most girls are honest and take sending there items seriously it's the bad eggs that give the good ones a bad name!