+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=84857)
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 14-11-2021 14:38
No SA its possible to argue for why BS are doing something while also arguing its not something I'd be partaking of as it stands atm. The concept of gold shows is the right one. I argued for it on this forum before it came about here but BS's implement is typically iffy from my perspective as a punter. That doesn't mean it can't be fixed or that I can't see sense in what they are trying to do.
You know better than to suggest I ever try to shout down anyone's opinions on here. I have always posted for the opposite. I'm just saying your arguments say BS has screwed the launch of this NOT that there's no logic in what BS are aiming at. Plus can you point to where I've assumed anything about your VIP status or otherwise?
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - SecretAgent - 14-11-2021 15:10
(14-11-2021 14:38 )ShandyHand Wrote: Plus can you point to where I've assumed anything about your VIP status or otherwise?
Now where on earth in my post did I say you did? I simply stated the fact that whatever your opinion is I'll make up my own mind! I've spoken before about where I see the flaws in the VIP's get Gold Shows free concept from a BS and girls perspective. From a punters perspective it seems like good deal.
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 14-11-2021 15:25
Referencing my "opinion [on] whether you become one" is at best a weird way of putting it. But as I say it's not my opinion of what YOU might do. It's just likely BS think it might help sway some guys that way. Or it would have done if they hadn't undermined all faith in it by playing silly buggers with the osg and not giving the info guys required of them.
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 14-11-2021 16:30
^^
Soon see if this is the case Winsaw and bs then u-turn as these non big name BS babes complain etc to the BS bosses
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 14-11-2021 18:14
(14-11-2021 13:46 )ShandyHand Wrote: They're not ending tipping or other goals though are they.
Without nudity, what are we left with? Clothed twerking and footjobs
This whole thing smacks of 'team meetings', 'focus groups', and all the other corporate bullshit that prevents 'management' from seeing the blindingly obvious that's staring them in the face. Seen it so many times in 'real life'.
If it's all about getting the explicit stuff behind paywall. They clearly now have the tech to restrict access to a show to only those who have paid for it, member or not. Apply that to the tip goals, change nothing else, job done. Nobody is adversely affected other than committed freeloaders, and they don't matter.
Secure your main revenue sources first, then tinker with gold shows after that if you want. It's not rocket science.
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - BlastedKeith - 14-11-2021 19:39
Could somebody explain this to me slowly, in short words? Is it that on Babestation, even on the web, we’re only going to see pussy in paid shows or on pervcam? If that’s the case, Studio66 is going to somehow end up the harder option (assuming they don’t get closed down by Ofcom shortly).
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 14-11-2021 19:46
^^ Ah now you will not find any argument from me. This is a different subject. The new change threatens to kill so much of what was truly unique about the shows.
BS and 66 are trying to redefine what the babeshows are. If they succeed I'll not be spending anymore. It'll be standard camming for the fooled, the star struck and those that think going one on one makes their experience some kind of relationship with the babe. Its not what I'm here for and never was.
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - SecretAgent - 14-11-2021 19:52
(14-11-2021 19:46 )ShandyHand Wrote: It'll be standard camming for the fooled, the star struck and those that think going one on one makes their experience some kind of relationship with the babe.
Why do you think it appropriate to disparage people who do not think like you? If people are happy surely that's fine for them. Your dislike for something is not how other people may wish to be measured
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 14-11-2021 20:03
You are right here. But this is a forum for opinions. I don't say they shouldn't have the shows they like but its the way I see a lot of this and am prepared to state what I feel. It's very easy to play safe when posting. But I've grown tired of doing that tbh.
RE: Babestation Gold Shows - Chat & Discussion - SecretAgent - 14-11-2021 20:29
(14-11-2021 20:03 )ShandyHand Wrote: You are right here. But this is a forum for opinions. I don't say they shouldn't have the shows they like but its the way I see a lot of this and am prepared to state what I feel. It's very easy to play safe when posting. But I've grown tired of doing that tbh.
Your opinions even if I disagree with some of them are welcomed but when you portray your opinion as being superior to what other forum members may wish to see or are even prepared to accept then you stray from opinion into something much less acceptable.
Having strongly felt views is fine (the forum would be a bland place if none of us held strong opinions on various topics from time to time) but they are just YOUR VIEWS and alternate opinions and viewing habits need not be disparaged. You seem to have forgotten that recently in my opinion and I say that with some sadness