Kandi - Babestation nightshow Chat and Discussion

Kandi - Babestation nightshow Chat and Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Cams (/forumdisplay.php?fid=374)
+--- Forum: Babestation Cams (/forumdisplay.php?fid=274)
+---- Forum: Kandi Kay (/forumdisplay.php?fid=270)
+---- Thread: Kandi - Babestation nightshow Chat and Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=15219)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100

RE: Kandi - nizy - 17-08-2011 19:14

(16-08-2011 15:27 )Trickster Wrote:
(16-08-2011 15:04 )Tintin Wrote: I'm thinking about joining her site but i'd love to know what it's like 1st, Is any 1 a member if yes could you tell me more about it / what's the content like?

Cheers

Im also curious coz she said there were pussy shots but is it full on open leg shots/closeups

I am currently a member of her site. As of today there is about 30 pic sets and 15 vids, although there is some crossover with the babestation.tv site with the older stuff. Probably about 50/50 with regards to exclusive content. The pictures are of decent quality, but the vids are only SD resolution. But at least they are downloadable. Currently its seems to be updated once a week with a new set, but there hasn't been a new vid in months, maybe there will be some from the Majorca shoots soon?

As for content, its mostly tease/implied. By implied I mean shots where she's nude but either covering the goods with her hand or in the way that she poses. And by tease i mean shots where she isn't nude, but maybe wearing some panties etc. Every set is at least topless i think. Her newer sets do go further, including some full nude shots with her pussy clearly visible. Big Grin

There is no explicit nudity (i.e. no close ups, spread lips etc).

Hope that helps.

RE: Kandi - pm74 - 17-08-2011 20:24

I think cellcast should do something like reality kings and other website providers
where you pay a fee and get assess to all their websites (clearly would be more that for one site)

I like Kandi but wouldn't pay for just her website

but if I could get the twins, Tiff, Camilla etc. would be very Interested

RE: Kandi - bigsmile - 18-08-2011 15:53

(17-08-2011 20:24 )pm74 Wrote: I think cellcast should do something like reality kings and other website providers
where you pay a fee and get assess to all their websites (clearly would be more that for one site)

I like Kandi but wouldn't pay for just her website

but if I could get the twins, Tiff, Camilla etc. would be very Interested

I completely agree. Then it would justify paying a monthly fee.

RE: Kandi - SteveHG - 18-08-2011 16:13

(17-08-2011 20:24 )pm74 Wrote: I think cellcast should do something like reality kings and other website providers
where you pay a fee and get assess to all their websites (clearly would be more that for one site)

As long it included Paige, Georgie and Stevie I'd be well up for it.

RE: Kandi - Trickster - 18-08-2011 22:24

thanks for that nizy

RE: Kandi - ganjamonster - 19-08-2011 01:22

(17-08-2011 19:14 )nizy Wrote: Every set is at least topless i think. Her newer sets do go further, including some full nude shots with her pussy clearly visible.

There is no explicit nudity (i.e. no close ups, spread lips etc).

Hope that helps.

rule 32 of rules of the internet:

32. you must provide pics to back up your statements!

pics or it isn't true! Tongue

RE: Kandi - SirAssAlot - 19-08-2011 20:23

(17-08-2011 19:14 )nizy Wrote: As for content, its mostly tease/implied. By implied I mean shots where she's nude but either covering the goods with her hand or in the way that she poses. And by tease i mean shots where she isn't nude, but maybe wearing some panties etc. Every set is at least topless i think. Her newer sets do go further, including some full nude shots with her pussy clearly visible.

There is no explicit nudity (i.e. no close ups, spread lips etc).

Hope that helps.

From what i can see there's loads of implied nudity as for (including some full nude shots with her pussy clearly visible) i'd love to know were those pics are. From all of her sets here's the so called explicit pics.

Regarding (including some full nude shots with her pussy clearly visible) I can't see any pussy apart from this 1

RE: Kandi - kelly1066 - 19-08-2011 20:44

i think ganjamonster was actually being slightly tongue in cheek... when he said they had to post some fully frontal pic or wouldnt be believed...... but nice to see someone took him literally.... lol.

cant see dear little kandi being happy when she sees these all here.... as no one will join her site now they've seen the good shots...?? pmsl.

RE: Kandi - jdizzle - 19-08-2011 20:54

wow crackin pics of the gorgeous Kandi, seen some before but always love seeing that sexy body!

RE: Kandi - nizy - 19-08-2011 23:45

@Tintin, Just cos you ain't seen them doesn't mean they aren't real. From what I've seen those are freely available outside her members area. But rest assured in the members area you really do get to see her pussy, with her legs open too. Tongue

I'm not affiliated with the site and have no reason to lie about it. Also, I'm not going to post the pics here (or anywhere else), so don't bother asking me.

Also check out this sexy story about Kandi that has some previews from her site, and even a few pics that aren't live yet. http://www.hotukbabes.com/2011/08/05/issue-6-of-hot-uk-babes-is-here/