The UK Babe Channels Forum
Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Red Light Central (/forumdisplay.php?fid=191)
+---- Thread: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=25154)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 28-04-2011 07:22

It's a tease and please thing its not supposed to be sex or naked your supposed to use your imagination and not just use the visual. Stop complaining about the minor details and enjoy it for what it is


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 28-04-2011 07:35

Exactly I don't give a monkeys about whether a babe wears 2 pairs of knicks. It's up to the babe herself. Also some outfits require the babe to wear 2 pairs. Just sit back and enjoy the show


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - cathybarry - 28-04-2011 07:59

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce
(28-04-2011 05:27 )Mellie D Wrote:  I was only wearing one pair of knickers last night, not big ones either. A thong. So you are exaggerating. The number of knickers a girl decides to wear is down to her. Do you honestly think that before a show we say "no you can't go on air unless you are wearing a billion pairs of pants" or something of that sort? eekSurprisedeek



(27-04-2011 22:53 )mr mystery Wrote:  what i mentioned was the fact that Jemma and the rest of the RLC girls are wearing 2 pairs of quite big knickers tonight ...



RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 28-04-2011 10:12

(28-04-2011 05:27 )Mellie D Wrote:  I was only wearing one pair of knickers last night, not big ones either. A thong. So you are exaggerating. The number of knickers a girl decides to wear is down to her. Do you honestly think that before a show we say "no you can't go on air unless you are wearing a billion pairs of pants" or something of that sort? eekSurprisedeek



(27-04-2011 22:53 )mr mystery Wrote:  what i mentioned was the fact that Jemma and the rest of the RLC girls are wearing 2 pairs of quite big knickers tonight ...

Thanks Mellie didn't realise you had only got 1 pair on , it looked like you had got 2 pairs on to me and they were bigger than the girls wear on other channels , maybe i should get a better tv bladewave
Glad to hear that the RLC girls aren't made to wear a "billion pairs of pants" (slight exaggeration there me thinks ) they would never get them all on .


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 28-04-2011 10:31

(28-04-2011 07:35 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Exactly I don't give a monkeys about whether a babe wears 2 pairs of knicks. It's up to the babe herself. Also some outfits require the babe to wear 2 pairs. Just sit back and enjoy the show

I have no problem with the girls wearing to pairs of knickers either if it's the babe's them selves that want to have to pairs on , no girl should be put in a position due to pressure from the company she works for or members of this forum or her callers to do and show more than she is comfortable doing , but saying that i personally prefer watching or calling girls that don't tend to wear 2 pairs , that's my preference .
When i made my original comment last night i was not aware that it was Jemma Jey that had herself decided to do the show wearing 2 pairs of knickers , Jemma has in the past mostly worn on other channels 1 very small pair of knickers or gone naked , so thought RLC must have instructed her to wear the 2 pairs , i now know according to Millie that it was Jemma herself that wanted to wear 2 pairs and that it was not RLC's decision .


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 28-04-2011 10:39

(28-04-2011 07:22 )Broncobilly Wrote:  It's a tease and please thing its not supposed to be sex or naked your supposed to use your imagination and not just use the visual. Stop complaining about the minor details and enjoy it for what it is

Sorry mate i was not aware that the RLC channels were not about sex or naked and you have to use you imagination , i probably watch the other channel to much that are about sex and nakedness and are about visual stimulation Big Grin


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - The Narcissist - 28-04-2011 10:57

I'm really loving RLC at the moment. I'm watching it way more than I am for the other channels. My current top channel


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - slanderful - 28-04-2011 12:31

(27-04-2011 22:53 )mr mystery Wrote:  I posted a few comments in Jemma Jey's thread but have since deleted them because they were more about RLC in general than Jemma . what i mentioned was the fact that Jemma and the rest of the RLC girls are wearing 2 pairs of quite big knickers tonight , all the girls on the other channels are wearing just i pair or no pairs (naked) or skimpy costumes , RLC tonight is by far the tamest of all the channels and much tamer than the Sport xxx channels, we know Ofcom have issues with Lucy Summers , but do RLC really need to make a girl like Jemma wear 2 pair of knickers ? , RLC are totally spoiling Jemma's shows with their "in house" regimental rules IMO , Cellcast used to allow Jemma to wear skimpy G strings on freeview Partypeople and Partygirls in the days before the girls were allowed to go topless , So Mellie or Cathy if you read this what is the reason why the girls on RLC a channel that has a 18+ licence and is in the adult section of the Sky EPG are having to wear double the amount of knickers to what the usually do or a least wear 2 pairs for the earlier part of the night shows ? whereas girls from all the other channels are allowed to wear far less , also will the girls ever be allowed to get naked again ? i look forward to you answers .

Of course they are gonna be tamer, they are ran by Playboy, they have got a lot of pressure from high up, and to be honest they seem to be doing well enough without breaking the rules??!! Of course the girls will get naked again but they had several ofcom complaints (no doubt from someone who runs another channel) they are just gonna play safe for a while....Mellie I love you!


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - iloveMegan - 28-04-2011 23:11

(14-04-2011 23:08 )iloveMegan Wrote:  It looks like RLC are at it again bladewave

I tried calling Dannii Harwood about a month ago and just got "You are now entering the red light lounge" message followed by silence for around twenty seconds, then I was kicked back to the menu. I tried again last Thursday and the same thing happened. I'm not going to try tonight, but given how much time she has spent waving her phone it definitely seems the same thing is happening tonight.

While trying to get through, I heard the same thing happen to quite a few other callers, it seemed that only every sixth caller or thereabouts actually gets through annoyed

And the exact same thing is happening tonight. Dannii only does one nightshow a week and has a big fanbase. Why Red Light can't just make money out of that instead of trying to squeeze a bit extra out of callers by either cutting them off or not putting them through in the first place is beyond me.

And in doing so they're likely to be putting people off calling in again. Does screwing a lot of people out of a small amount make better business sense than providing a decent service people are willing to spend a lot of money on (£1.53 isn't exactly cheap), and potentially become repeat customers of?


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - stilettos - 29-04-2011 00:51

(28-04-2011 23:11 )iloveMegan Wrote:  Why Red Light can't just make money out of that instead of trying to squeeze a bit extra out of callers by either cutting them off or not putting them through in the first place is beyond me.

And in doing so they're likely to be putting people off calling in again. Does screwing a lot of people out of a small amount make better business sense than providing a decent service people are willing to spend a lot of money on (£1.53 isn't exactly cheap), and potentially become repeat customers of?

I will never call any of the channels again, its way too expensive, ive been there,paid the billls,couldve got several decent whores,or women i know to shag me for the cash i spent. Whilst it is tempting, its never,ever worth the cost! Im staggered at the amount who can still afford to call in, unless theyre using someone elses phone of whom they dont like? RolleyesbladewaveHuhannoyed