Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255) +----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66) +----- Thread: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? (/showthread.php?tid=60031) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 |
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - jimmyt73 - 12-06-2014 09:10 I will keep this short last night was Black Wednesday 2. RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Rammyrascal - 12-06-2014 09:38 ^^^^^ wtf??? last night as bad as the infamous black Wednesday night, don't think so myself. are you saying this just because gemma hiles was on doing a tease show, given you are so anti s66 tease shows and because dani daniels was on. thought last night was a good midweek night myself RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Snooks - 12-06-2014 09:39 Q1: Does Gemma deserve some credit? Yes due to extending her hours to cover an extra 2.5 hours. She has always been a dayshow babe who does extended naughty hour type performances and not beyond so a dose of reality in terms of expectation is called for imo. Q2: Do S66 deserve criticism? Definitely. They should always be in a situation where there is always one babe more than there are channels. So this means 4 babes across 3 channels. If all four turn up then when one goes on a break the fourth one steps in. If one cancels there are still enough babes to cover each channel. S66 may say they could not arrange cover by a conventional nightshow babe. Hardly surprising seeing as their options are limited due to a pitifully small roster. Last night the cover was only for 2.5 hours and not by a conventional nightshow babe. That is no fault of Gemma's its just the way it is. Bottom line - S66 dug themselves ahole a while ago that has been getting ever deeper and now they are paying the price. The organisation of this channel is a total shambles and completely indefensible. The quality of shows has gone down the pan. Laziness and complacency is now deep rooted at S66 imo to such a degree the self applied humiliation is making S66 an utter laughing stock. RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - mr mystery - 12-06-2014 09:57 (12-06-2014 09:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: for once s66 did sort out a cover babe and yet they are still getting flack???? Who was the night time cover babe STD 66 sorted out ?, i didn't see one, i saw a daytime girl just doing a few hours of a extended tease show, she then left i assume and that was it, did a proper night girl then appear ?, or did they have just 2 night girls covering all their channels for many night time hours that were left, i don't actually know as i went to bed . RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Rammyrascal - 12-06-2014 10:00 pretty much agree with you here snookered. agree completely with what your saying about gemma hiles. as for your second point, agree a babeshow should have 1 more babe than they have channels, so in s66's case they should have 4 babes on given they have 3 channels for all the reasons you say. agree also the roster is smaller than it needs to be and does need to be added to to increase their options if like last night a babe isn't on disagree s66 is a laughing stock though snookered and don't think the quality of the shows has gone down as bad as you say they have though mrmystery the cover for mica was gemma hiles, but it was cover none the less after that yes s66 had 2 girls covering 3 channels once she had left. RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Charlemagne - 12-06-2014 10:09 Studio 66 need to arrange last minute backup for when a babe can't make a show. One option is to use a trailist who is willing to come on the show at short notice..... RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - KerrAvon - 12-06-2014 10:16 Well according the S66 statisticians & accountants on here, the US babes will be making so much money for S66, that they probably don't need any other babes on anyway RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - dominar rygel xvi - 12-06-2014 10:26 (12-06-2014 09:39 )snookered147 Wrote: They should always be in a situation where there is always one babe more than there are channels. So this means 4 babes across 3 channels. They don't even have 3 channels anymore. RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - speedybert - 12-06-2014 11:55 (11-06-2014 05:17 )Danzig Wrote:(11-06-2014 01:30 )anchorman Wrote: Who's the new boring chick? Dani Daniels who I have seen in some vids,OK but not outstanding.I still stick with my original theory that some of S66's problems seem to have arisen since they took on the RLC girls.There only seem to be a handful of their original girls left(lilly,Adele,Caty)Jess West is AWOL and Ashley Emma has jumped ship.Who knows? RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Joey 27 - 12-06-2014 12:15 (12-06-2014 09:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote:no they didn't they used a daybabe on a nightshow, plus gemma could have easily said no but she wanted the extra money despite not delivering a night time performance, but let me guess her phone stats were good and that's all that matters isn't it(12-06-2014 00:42 )☆☆D☆T☆☆ Wrote:(12-06-2014 00:35 )Liverred Wrote: Why have Gemma Hiles on a nightshow when she won't even go topless? I don't see the point. |