+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 Daytime babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=312)
+----- Thread: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=9072)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - Ed Knoll - 03-05-2012 16:18
(03-05-2012 10:37 )tee Wrote: If she's married and wants to keep her modesty. Maybe she's in wrong profession. Or maybe we are wrong. She's still attracting lot if calls compare to women who r wearing next to nothing. She's a very good on the phones. So I guess ppl enjoy her company.
Don't think there is a wrong or a right we are all entitled to an opinion. Whilst I can understand people frustrations to Vikki stopping caps being posted it is not going to stop me from liking her.
As you rightly mention Vikki is still attracting a lot of calls. As long as people continue to do so she will remain there. Our collective views in here be they positive, negative or indifferent will count for very little. However I for one very much enjoy debating the pros and cons of all the babes and not just the lovely Vikki.
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - zimbo78 - 04-05-2012 17:14
This article from january doesn't reveal when they married, but she lost her appeal for me!
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/showbiz-and-lifestyle/music-in-wales/2012/01/28/former-royal-navy-fitness-instructor-jay-james-picton-prepares-to-release-an-album-with-decca-91466-30212481/2/
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - Ed Knoll - 06-05-2012 14:57
(04-05-2012 17:14 )zimbo78 Wrote: This article from january doesn't reveal when they married, but she lost her appeal for me!
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/showbiz-and-lifestyle/music-in-wales/2012/01/28/former-royal-navy-fitness-instructor-jay-james-picton-prepares-to-release-an-album-with-decca-91466-30212481/2/
Thanks. That would explain recent mention of visit to Wales on Twitter then. To be honest I think most of the girls are in probably relationships and it does not change Vikki's strong appeal to me. It is great to see here looking happy. May be if I phoned her on a regular basis I would feel different.
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - bob roberts - 07-05-2012 10:05
I wonder why some of us get so wrapped up in the babe channels. Why do some of us think that the young women owe us explanations for their behaviours?
There was a similar thread going on Paige Tyler recently. They owe us nothing. If certain behaviours create risks of their losing fans, so be it.I have chatted with Vikki only a few times. She is an absolutely delightful person. Her beauty is not just physical; it generates from inside. In addition to being married (August, 2011), she has a few other business and charitable interests. Whatever she decides and does is fine with me. I suppose this will get me labelled a "fanboy". OK with me.
Why not just watch, chat and enjoy?
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - Ed Knoll - 07-05-2012 10:16
Thanks for great reply Bob. Good to hear from somebody who has chatted with Vikki.
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - Ed Knoll - 08-05-2012 12:43
Vikki looking sensational today in a red dress. Hot hot hot! Full of smiles great viewing.
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - stilettos - 15-05-2012 23:37
Married or not, its ridiculous that she wont allow caps or vids here,while many other attached models the world over are fine with it. I wonder how much it bothers her to know we are all still recording hours of her to keep for ourselves?
(and im a longtime fan!)
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - stilettos - 15-05-2012 23:39
(07-05-2012 10:05 )bob roberts Wrote: I wonder why some of us get so wrapped up in the babe channels. Why do some of us think that the young women owe us explanations for their behaviours?
I have chatted with Vikki only a few times. She is an absolutely delightful person. Her beauty is not just physical; it generates from inside. In addition to being married (August, 2011), she has a few other business and charitable interests. Whatever she decides and does is fine with me. I suppose this will get me labelled a "fanboy". OK with me.
Why not just watch, chat and enjoy?
Because she is the only girl on these channels who operates this obsessive behaviour.
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - bob roberts - 16-05-2012 00:22
(15-05-2012 23:39 )stilettos Wrote: Because she is the only girl on these channels who operates this obsessive behaviour.
As control of her image is her right, what's the point of going on about it?
RE: Vikki Thomas - Chat & Discussion - stilettos - 16-05-2012 00:28
(16-05-2012 00:22 )bob roberts Wrote: As control of her image is her right, what's the point of going on about it?
QED, she is the only one in the known world who behaves this way. It can only be a negative thing towards her career, and the fact that she still works on her channel,yet forbids pictures is bordering on deranged.