Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150) +--- Thread: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17684) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 |
RE: BS XTREME Screenshots - mrmann - 13-05-2010 22:40 Try to post some from Camilla's show tonight if you can. I hear she's gonna be on. RE: BS XTREME Screenshots - Grawth - 14-05-2010 09:32 (13-05-2010 21:25 )dirk362 Wrote: For those that have been monitoring this thread you'll have seen some of my picture posts have either dissappeared or have had some pics removed from them. I guess you're referring to the caps of Amanda? If so I have to disagree with your acceptance of their removal. The Amanda bit was clearly beyond what Ofcom allow, which I assume is why they've been removed, but this is typical of all the adult pay channels. One or two occasions of stuff they're not supposed to show to draw the subscribers in, followed by huge piles of guff with the always ready excuse that "Ofcom limit what we can show". So we have Amanda doing good work, pre-recorded. Cellcast knew what was going out. There will be more subscribers on the back of it. And now that they've had the desired effect they get removed. They should either stick to the limits (in which case they'll not make much money), or they should actually have the guts to take a stand and broadcast what we all want. Ofcom's case will NEVER stand up in a court, otherwise we would not have hardcore magazines and DVDs in this country. Don't believe the hype. Wait for at least a month of good stuff before you pay. And don't give in to their shabby attempts to drum up extra trade and then pretend nothing ever happened. RE: BS XTREME Screenshots - admiral decker - 14-05-2010 09:36 (14-05-2010 09:32 )Grawth Wrote: So we have Amanda doing good work, pre-recorded. Cellcast knew what was going out. There will be more subscribers on the back of it. You can't subscribe to Babestation Xtreme. [split] BS XTREME Screenshots - Grawth - 14-05-2010 12:25 (14-05-2010 09:36 )admiral decker Wrote:(14-05-2010 09:32 )Grawth Wrote: So we have Amanda doing good work, pre-recorded. Cellcast knew what was going out. There will be more subscribers on the back of it. OK, so pay per night. It's still payment viewing, which is the key point. They have a couple of occasions when things are good, then weeks of guff while people have paid PURELY BECAUSE OF REPORTS OF GOOD STUFF waste their money, and then the cycle repeats. At worst, the channel gets a warning, but they make a large amount of money doing it. Even a fine is an acceptable risk given the money they make sucking in hopeful punters. For previous examples how about Playboy with hardcore Sandy Babe Abroad night (lasted one night), or TVX and RedHot with Antonia Live Back Stage and Lolly's Live Peep Show (2 nights of toy action then nothing). Even if TVX only got 50 new subscribers from that fortnight, that would make enough money to cover a £10,000 fine. The only channel that bucked the trend was SportXXX when for a period of weeks, possibly months, they showed toy action several times a week. Why it stopped I don't know. So, the point I was trying to make is that showing a small amount of hard stuff, then banging out the excuses (and hiding the evidence) is standard adult PAY channel behaviour. Oh, and technically, a subscription is a payment. Any payment. What you can't do is have a MONTHLY subscription to BSX. RE: BS XTREME Screenshots - Rogerbee - 14-05-2010 13:56 Good points and very well made. They are precisely why I didn't bother with it after launch night. Also, how many people paying this VIP price (what it says on the site) feel all that special once they've paid and tuned in!? RE: BS XTREME Screenshots - dirk362 - 15-05-2010 08:41 Just to fan the flames a bit more the Amanda vid was shown again last night, but a new edit - this showed none of the explicitness of the originally aired one. So it's been edited, and perhaps this is what should have gone out first time as well. Channels do make mistakes where they have the same video in varying strengths. It's happened across most channels, so I think it unfair to call it a ploy on their part unless someone has information that confirms it. If you have people in the process, you have to remember that people are fallible - mistakes can and will happen. Live with them, and move on, which is what cellcast seem to have done in this case by ensuring the mistake doesn't happen again. RE: [split] BS XTREME Screenshots - elgar1uk - 15-05-2010 08:44 (14-05-2010 12:25 )Grawth Wrote: Oh, and technically, a subscription is a payment. Not according to Wikipedia where it distinguishes a subscription from a one time payment. Not according to Webster's dictionary either, which states: an arrangement for providing, receiving, or making use of something of a continuing or periodic nature on a prepayment plan: such as a purchase by prepayment for a certain number of issues (as of a periodical) RE: BS XTREME Screenshots - HEX!T - 15-05-2010 08:57 (15-05-2010 08:41 )dirk362 Wrote: Just to fan the flames a bit more the Amanda vid was shown again last night, but a new edit - this showed none of the explicitness of the originally aired one. So it's been edited, and perhaps this is what should have gone out first time as well. you give them to much credit m8, it was deliberate cellcast dont make mistakes they have been in the business to long. it was so guys like you would post the pix on here and give them what amounts to word of mouth advertising. chances are the vid was shown to boost flagging subs and cause a stir. the fact they re-edited it is nothing new. no doubt (hopfully soon to be defunct) ofcom would have a field day with the channel if it went a couple of days showing such content, but 1s in a blue moon means they can get away with it and gain subscribers (yes you are a subscriber even paying by night) yet minamise the chance of sum1 complaining to the watchdogs. RE: BS XTREME Screenshots - dirk362 - 15-05-2010 11:56 As Tiffany is currently on a break for a bit, the vid must be from some time ago. But this is the 1st time that video has been shown on BSXtreme (to my knowledge). There have been a total of 3 vids of Tiffany so far, although I believe all are available on her website already... RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - aaron - 15-05-2010 12:26 Not according to Paypal either, as you can make a payment and then be asked if you want to subscribe to that service. |