Storm - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115) +---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 |
RE: Storm - Charlemagne - 14-07-2011 06:36 When Storm took over I was expecting them to try and move up to the top league.... But their only improvement has been the swing set... And after last night, I can only say that it looks like Storm are heading for the rocks. RE: Storm - winsaw - 14-07-2011 11:06 ^^^spot on mate, sorry storm but if you want to grow the channel you need to be signing girls who have a wider appeal than Brook, i thought your first sighing Cali was a great move and a statement of intent that you were going to move away from CP's little channel mindset but last night was a real step backwards RE: Storm - mr williams - 14-07-2011 11:39 I understand where you're coming from, as on her style and appearance Brook probably wouldn't float my boat, either (nothing personal, Brook, and I know you are a lovely person!), but there have always been a number of girls across the channels, be they older women, much older women, very large woman, massive titted women, tattooed women, "alternative look" women etc who you would not class as mainstream babes, and whilst they don't appeal to you and I they do appeal to a lot of people and have enough of a following and generate enough calls to justify employing them. If Brook were to do three solo nights a week I would agree with you, but as an Option 2 behind one of the channel's core babes on a Wednesday night I don't see where the problem is. And bear in mind she's brand new and still learning - last night was only her second ever show. We all have our personal likes and dislikes but it'll be a sad day when the girls who have what you might call specialist appeal are forced out and we are left with only a certain prescribed type of "babe". The amount of choice we have has been drastically reduced in the past seven months and I don't want to see it reduced any more. So well done Brook and well done Storm. RE: Storm - KerrAvon - 14-07-2011 11:45 Although, as Storm has said, changes won't happen overnight, I did expect at least a few more statements of intent. Never even mind new babes yet, they could at least stir things up with the current babes, who are capable of top performances. A few more sets and bigger ones, change the lighting, different camera angles etc. I for one will be glad to see the back of those sheets & curtains. At the moment it's looking like a quick coat of new paint rather than a refurbish. RE: Storm - SOCATOA - 14-07-2011 11:55 Beds and oily babes That floats my boat RE: Storm - iamthatjack - 14-07-2011 12:12 The most frustrating thing about Storm for me personally is the lack of variation in general! The same few babes, on the same set, just lying there never doing too much, always looking miserable! they need to up there game or do something if they wanna progress! Some more babes and a least a couple more sets are desperately found wanting RE: Storm - winsaw - 14-07-2011 12:14 (14-07-2011 11:39 )mr williams Wrote: I understand where you're coming from, as on her style and appearance Brook probably wouldn't float my boat, either (nothing personal, Brook, and I know you are a lovely person!), but there have always been a number of girls across the channels, be they older women, much older women, very large woman, massive titted women, tattooed women, "alternative look" women etc who you would not class as mainstream babes, and whilst they don't appeal to you and I they do appeal to a lot of people and have enough of a following and generate enough calls to justify employing them. i think you are missing my point mate, when storm took over CP they were making out that they wanted to move away from CP's little independent out look and more to wards becoming a mainstream channel but after a good start they have slipped back in to bob's way of doing things, i see your point about having a 2nd girl with a different look but on storm she will be on her own of long spells of time and i think this hurts storm as people going through the channels may not come back to see who the main girl is i think that none of the sport girls were took on says it all, as this would have been to perfect chance to do what rlc did when bang went bang and use the girls to become a bigger channel RE: Storm - frankiemania - 14-07-2011 13:12 what storm needs is some fresh new girls on this channel if they are to keep on going. RE: Storm - shankey! - 20-07-2011 14:16 just get roxanna to take her nix of next time she is on ,she is hot hot hot! RE: Storm - STORM OFFICIAL - 20-07-2011 16:56 (14-07-2011 11:45 )KerrAvon Wrote: I for one will be glad to see the back of those sheets & curtains. So will we! We've had a major hold-up on a lot of things we want to do, but are still working on things! We have a new babe doing a trial shift next weekend and all of our girls will be posting new pics and videos on the website in the next three weeks. Our additional service to make up for the loss of the adult hour during the day had had a technical problem so can't launch yet, but if you want to try it before we launch (you'll still have to pay!) please send me a private message. |