+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 25-11-2012 00:16
Furthermore all the present 2 for 1's are doing is damaging the high reputation that they once used to hold with us. To put it bluntly. It's bloody sacrilege.
They are ruining the good name. Whenever I hear on a channel that a 2 for 1 is coming up it's a good warning sign for me not to bother wasting my time looking to see anything interesting. Time to switch the channel and avoid that one I think.
With this ofcom parania that is so prevelant then it's even more obvious when 2 for 1's are kicking in. Yes also agree with you. For the majority of the time it just looks like 2 random strangers have been thrown together on the same bed with zero percent chemistry coming from either one of them.
2 for 1's, I'd more likely call them 0's for 2's if I'm being brutally honest with you here
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 25-11-2012 00:21
I was partial to a bit of Zarwood in their heyday but even their 2-4-1s don't have the edge they used to have in years gone by. We rarely see Zarwood now but in their pomp their chemistry created shows that I really loved.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Chilly - 25-11-2012 00:22
(25-11-2012 00:03 )snookered147 Wrote: The 2-4-1s of old seem like a long and distant memory now don't they?
There has to be a genuine chemistry between two babes to make the concept work and then they have to be allowed the freedom to show some intensity in their interaction. Either one or both of these things seems lacking in the current 2-4-1s. It seems a couple of blondes or couple of brunettes are just put together with no rhyme or reason these days in the vain hope that it will produce something entertaining and watchable. The Caty-Charlie 2-4-1 is the one that I will always recall most fondly.
Not much they can do when you read this:
![[Image: Capture1.jpg]](http://s7.postimage.org/o9e3n61hn/Capture1.jpg)
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 25-11-2012 00:28
can i just say its a bit unfair to blame the babeshow babes or the channels for how the 241's are these days. they have to follow the rules laid down by ofcom about 241's which have been tightened up compared to the clasisc 241's in the past. one between caty and danica springs to mind for me from a couple of years ago. there is the odd 241 at the moment that is good, i enjoy jessy jensen and sasha for the fun they have on screen together both on the mic and off it with the odd spank of each other's bums and the odd cheeky fondle of each others boobs
but lots of people clearly still do enjoy the 241's now and call in as the channels are still doing them. if they werent bringing in calls or money they wouldnt do them
im sure the channels would like to do proper 241's again but the fact is they simply cannot do so. also it's not ofcom parnoia as some people think. its simply conforming to the rules from ofcom, if they didnt theyd get punished and evenutally taken off the air and no one wants that
if you dont like the 241's then dont watch them
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 25-11-2012 00:29
Well this is why I say why bother. If the present rules don't allow for much of an erotic spectacle then it just defeats the purpose and arguably leads the viewers and callers on a wild goose chase especially when the presenters are telling bullshit lies about just how dirty they are going to be.
2 for 1's should be scrapped before they are bastardised any further. If current ofcom rules don't allow for anything good to come from them then leave them for the time being so that our memories are still positive rather than being tainted.
PS - I've already stated that I don't bother with watching the current tame 2 for 1's but it doesn't make my opinion more valid or invalid than somebody who does enjoy watching this in it's current shambles.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - dirtbag - 25-11-2012 00:38
That Ofcom statement doesn't read that girls are not allowed to interact with each other, it indicates that they may cause offence if they do interact with each other. Was it written by a LibDem as that has to be the most wishy washy statement I have ever come across.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 25-11-2012 00:40
Ofcom may as well declare that anything that we viewers would enjoy is clearly offensive and should be outlawed.
Depressing
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Chilly - 25-11-2012 14:48
The small number of complaints that the babe channels receive when 'incidents' or 2-4-1 shows happen just contradicts Ofcom's bullshit view that there's a high risk of causing serious or widespread offence. The babe channel owners are a strange bunch, 'cause I can't imagine many businesses would allow such laughable rules and regs to dictate how they operate. In reality, the TV shows that consistently receive a large amount of complaints are usually on ITV or the BBC, which would tell you that far more people are concerned about those shows than they are about the babe channels.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 25-11-2012 15:09
The problem with ofcom's generally accepted idea is that they fail to get it that on adult tv its generally accepted to have adult content. Pity the bosses of the shows don't eight for the industry they represent and just fob people off.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - schmoo - 25-11-2012 16:11
(25-11-2012 15:09 )Broncobilly Wrote: The problem with ofcom's generally accepted idea is that they fail to get it that on adult tv its generally accepted to have adult content. Pity the bosses of the shows don't eight for the industry they represent and just fob people off.
Ex... fkn... actly!
Until Ofcom are "challenged", whether it be by central government, a third party, or from within Ofcom itself, there is fuck all that can/will be done. We have to live with this.
However, there is one very slight thing that "we" the viewers (moreover, callers) can do to possibly effect any change, albeit almost a negilible one. And that is to force the hand of the channel bosses to do something. How...? To not call.
But we all know this is never going to happen.
So again, (referring back to my first paragraph aside) there is fuck all that can/will be done.
So basically, we're fucked with the fucking crap "adult" channels alot of us constantly watch and moan about. And i dare say they'd be more too that won't admit it.
Live with it people.