+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Xpanded TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=277)
+--- Thread: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=49998)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 30-08-2015 23:03
Cheers gunner
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 31-08-2015 05:57
Welcome back Billy
Given their North Korea status, are Xxpanded beginning to go the same way as Sin and drag the Playboy name down with it too? If they are I think it won't be as spectacular as Sin's downfall - will it? I guess the only reason that girls looking at tori & must be wondering what she was on at Sin before it collapsed and has she carried the effects of that collapse into Xxpanded or have Xxpanded hired some of the production staff from sin TV?
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - Black Cat - 31-08-2015 06:31
Welcome back mate.
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 31-08-2015 07:11
(31-08-2015 05:57 )babelover48 Wrote: Welcome back Billy
Given their North Korea status, are Xxpanded beginning to go the same way as Sin and drag the Playboy name down with it too? If they are I think it won't be as spectacular as Sin's downfall - will it? I guess the only reason that girls looking at tori & must be wondering what she was on at Sin before it collapsed and has she carried the effects of that collapse into Xxpanded or have Xxpanded hired some of the production staff from sin TV?
Thank you,
I think Sin basically did not have the money so it all went wrong, perhaps this channel does but PB allowed Red Light to go under so they won't help this lot.
Perhaps they have done what Sin did hire too many top girls and sort of wing it.
The production is very similar to Sin it all looks amateur and nervous.
They have no mic interaction with the viewers so it could be seen as a pre record which is the ultimate error. They have numbers on screen so it is live but it all looks very poor.
The talent don't look particularly interested so something has to improve or it will be over soon.
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - amy1 - 31-08-2015 09:52
^but isn't this the way they have always been? cheap, easily produced no-thrills stuff, its whats sustained them this long and probably will keep them going for the forseeable future.
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - m100 - 31-08-2015 11:13
yes it is but previously they employed either brand new girls or those who had often been under-used elsewhere now they've become the MLS of babechannels employment - employing a lot of girls who have been to almost every other channel and would probably otherwise retire and they are not cheap.
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - amy1 - 31-08-2015 12:05
(31-08-2015 11:13 )m100 Wrote: yes it is but previously they employed either brand new girls or those who had often been under-used elsewhere now they've become the MLS of babechannels employment - employing a lot of girls who have been to almost every other channel and would probably otherwise retire and they are not cheap.
If they are still doing what they have always done, why bother tripling the wage bill if they are still gonna produce the same product.
ITs like liverpool finishing 4th, spending £200m and then finishing 4th again, might aswell not of spent anything. keep things ticking over and build slowly.
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 31-08-2015 12:14
(31-08-2015 07:11 )Broncobilly Wrote: I think Sin basically did not have the money so it all went wrong, perhaps this channel does but PB allowed Red Light to go under so they won't help this lot.
sorry Billy but everything you have put in that statement is wrong,
sin did have the money they just wasted it and then it all went wrong,
xpanded has never had a lot of money and until they got the playboy name have made a point of paying the least of any channel also have tried to keep production as cheep as possible,
playboy did not let RLC go under, RLC was and is in very good financial health and has not go under, they chose to stop paying playboy for the use of there name,
why would playboy help xpanded as all they do is take money off them for the use of there name
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 31-08-2015 12:17
(31-08-2015 12:05 )amy1 Wrote:Even to stay the same teams invest.(31-08-2015 11:13 )m100 Wrote: yes it is but previously they employed either brand new girls or those who had often been under-used elsewhere now they've become the MLS of babechannels employment - employing a lot of girls who have been to almost every other channel and would probably otherwise retire and they are not cheap.
If they are still doing what they have always done, why bother tripling the wage bill if they are still gonna produce the same product.
ITs like liverpool finishing 4th, spending £200m and then finishing 4th again, might aswell not of spent anything. keep things ticking over and build slowly.
I think this channel has now over reached. The cheap and cheerful model won't work as it won't generate enough income to cover the increased salary requirements as once the novelty wears off the viewers want more than just a pretty statue.
I hope I am wrong but we have seen this before.
RE: Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 31-08-2015 12:20
(31-08-2015 12:14 )winsaw Wrote:I had to be wrong eventually(31-08-2015 07:11 )Broncobilly Wrote: I think Sin basically did not have the money so it all went wrong, perhaps this channel does but PB allowed Red Light to go under so they won't help this lot.
sorry Billy but everything you have put in that statement is wrong,
sin did have the money they just wasted it and then it all went wrong,
xpanded has never had a lot of money and until they got the playboy name have made a point of paying the least of any channel also have tried to keep production as cheep as possible,
playboy did not let RLC go under, RLC was and is in very good financial health and has not go under, they chose to stop paying playboy for the use of there name,
why would playboy help xpanded as all they do is take money off them for the use of there name
