RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - alwayswanking - 05-02-2013 00:18
on Studio66 you have the "Big stars" who the majority of viewers like, and then you have the "flops" or "averages" who some viewers like and some completely dislike. In my opinion the "big stars" are the likes of Vikki T, Fern F, Gemma H, Sophia L, Becky R, Anastasia H, Dionne D. When any of those aren't on whether its during the day/night i consider there to be no talent on show. But i get that people will disagree with me, but there the babes that i like viewing
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 05-02-2013 02:04
Anyone else just see Afroman all over Adele on stream 4
Not shown on the TV! Couldn't tell if he was girating on her, or just on the set, but the crotch shots were interesting
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Cj123 - 05-02-2013 10:28
Yep u said, reason they leave , offer to good to turn down or stats not good enough so st66 let them go.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 06-02-2013 03:56
Was Sasha never on tonight? What happened to Caty? Long break or did she go home?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - loveass - 06-02-2013 09:32
Where are they getting the new signings from checkout girls or failed pornstars the are terrible.
End of studio 66 or elite.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 06-02-2013 11:16
(06-02-2013 03:56 )mrmann Wrote: Was Sasha never on tonight? What happened to Caty? Long break or did she go home?
yeah sasha was on last night. she seemed to dissapear about midnight. presume she wasnt well and finished early. as for caty havent a clue. she did do a long stint around the time sasha dissapeared so probably was on a long break or finished.
loveass disagree the new signings are terrible and they are definately not checkout girls or failed pornstars. s66 has made some good additions over recent weeks, the best have been for me courtney tugwell, sapphire blue, leigh darby and chanel pearl. what will decide if they are good/bad/terrible etc will be their stats. if they arent good s66 will get rid
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mickster - 07-02-2013 07:15
In my opinion what S66needs to do is have a better range of sets like RLC .The standard "girl on bed lying there "has a place ,but only for about an hour .Then it becomes boring ,predictable and samey night after night .A few different outstanding set scenarios ,"uniform" theme nights and viva la difference .The format is stale at present and needs a good shake up.Agree when the "big names " aren't around the rest look a little lost ,but if you take the top girls from the other channels its the same result .Yes we all have our favourites ,just more people have the same favourites .At the end of the day ALL the girls have some attractive qualities ,otherwise they wouldn't have become models or got t.v.jobs.The new girls just need a little time for us to get used to them and vice versa .
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 07-02-2013 09:53
(07-02-2013 07:15 )mickster Wrote: In my opinion what S66needs to do is have a better range of sets like RLC .The standard "girl on bed lying there "has a place ,but only for about an hour .Then it becomes boring ,predictable and samey night after night .A few different outstanding set scenarios ,"uniform" theme nights and viva la difference .The format is stale at present and needs a good shake up.Agree when the "big names " aren't around the rest look a little lost ,but if you take the top girls from the other channels its the same result .Yes we all have our favourites ,just more people have the same favourites .At the end of the day ALL the girls have some attractive qualities ,otherwise they wouldn't have become models or got t.v.jobs.The new girls just need a little time for us to get used to them and vice versa .
thats what ive been saying before mickster. to early to write off the new babes s66 has added recently. they need time to settle in and get used to everything and us and babeshow viewers in general need to get used to them. also agree all the babes have attractive qualities otherwise as you say they wouldnt be models etc or be on the babeshows
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 07-02-2013 11:17
If girls needs time to settle in before we can judge them, how come Studio 66 can only seem to give certain girls one or two shows at most before they're judged not good enough. If they can make a quick opinion, I don't see we can't even if opinions differ.
I can usually (but not every time) tell within one or two shows if a girl is going to take my fancy, if she doesn't float my boat no amount of shows will usually change it. Ally-Lou is one who immediately impressed me.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mickster - 08-02-2013 17:35
I take your point KerrAvon about "instant attraction"and the channel will be hoping for "instant payback".My idea is sometimes a girl you originally may not have fancied may appear again dressed differently or moving around on a different set and you suddenly see her in a different light .I'llgive an example even though its only semi relevant .In her very early days on early bird Fernanda was virtually wrapped upunder a duvet most of the time and only got average attention .Soon as she started wearing the catsuit etc ,she rocketed and as never looked back Finding the right scenario that plays to each girls "strengths"is the "magical formula"and the key i.m.o.
A
little experimentation before they cast them aside I reckon .
|