(10-02-2013 13:33 )munch1917 Wrote:  ^^^ Unlikely to happen given the Ofcom guidelines :

Quote:Adult chat broadcasters should:
...
at no time broadcast images of any real or simulated sex acts (these include vaginal
or anal intercourse, masturbation, fellatio or cunnilingus);

Even if it's obviously simulated, with the 'main action' out of shot, I can imagine Ofcom would be all over this. They aren't even supposed to suck their fingers to simulate oral anymore, so pretending to shag the cameraman is well off limits.

(10-02-2013 13:33 )munch1917 Wrote:  ^^^ Unlikely to happen given the Ofcom guidelines :

Quote:Adult chat broadcasters should:
...
at no time broadcast images of any real or simulated sex acts (these include vaginal
or anal intercourse, masturbation, fellatio or cunnilingus);

Even if it's obviously simulated, with the 'main action' out of shot, I can imagine Ofcom would be all over this. They aren't even supposed to suck their fingers to simulate oral anymore, so pretending to shag the cameraman is well off limits.

(10-02-2013 22:02 )babefinder Wrote:  ^^^Spot on...channels do simulated masturbation pretty much every night!

As for ofcom coming down hard on channels or girls that have some off screen fun.....really? Has any channel ever got an ofcom fine for something like this? Dont think so and there has been alot worse crew/girl interaction over the years than claire grinding her ass off the cam guy!!

Id say as long as nothing is seen they're good to go

(10-02-2013 22:29 )Shan_afc_90 Wrote:  

(10-02-2013 22:02 )babefinder Wrote:  ^^^Spot on...channels do simulated masturbation pretty much every night!

As for ofcom coming down hard on channels or girls that have some off screen fun.....really? Has any channel ever got an ofcom fine for something like this? Dont think so and there has been alot worse crew/girl interaction over the years than claire grinding her ass off the cam guy!!

Id say as long as nothing is seen they're good to go

As much as ppl want this Ain't gna happen as the producers are too PG to do this kind of thing

(10-02-2013 22:47 )Shan_afc_90 Wrote:  The key word is try, why not just do that? I mean if they get reported and ofcom deem them to be in breach then atleast you can say "thanks for at least trying, we commend u"

(10-02-2013 14:10 )alwayswanking Wrote:  I can remember back in the day on BangBabes the girls used to use a real gguy and although he was fully clothed, the babes would show how they would fuck etc... They should bring that sort of thing back

(10-02-2013 03:53 )mrmann Wrote:  Just a suggestion, but I think the cameramen should either pretend to, or really shag the women on screen, out of shot of course. I think if we are given that impression, that it could really help Studio 66 be the channel of the year

There's a lot they can do to fake this, while making it believable! We get some grinding and such, and pretend wanking of the cameramen (some of it appears to be real) which is fun, but I'm talking about the women really putting on a show, whether it's real or faked. We won't be able to tell regardless. The other channels have done this at times, yet Studio 66 has not.

That's the devil on my shoulder telling me to say this.

It doesn't need to be shagging, but maybe oral, with the women physically moving to it!

What do you all think? eagle_si? Anyone?