The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Babestation Daytime (/forumdisplay.php?fid=390)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION DAYTIME GENERAL FORUM (/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+---- Thread: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=15093)



RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - FanofCamilla - 17-08-2016 19:44

(16-08-2016 23:17 )REX MASTER Wrote:  I'm sure I seen a new babe on BS Daytime on Tuesday... She looked very hot. Who was she?

Polly - blonde girl, that's all I knew atm


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - babemaniac - 19-08-2016 09:48

(16-08-2016 19:07 )Block Wrote:  
(10-08-2016 06:49 )FanofCamilla Wrote:  Found out today that the day girls who are doing tease hours, have to stay clothed, any underwear showing is for perv cam only - new rules from BS.

If this indeed the case, (i don't know your source) then why are BS or indeed any of the Babeshows imposing rules.
Ofcunt are the body that imposes rules. If what you say is correct then this is all that is wrong at the moment with these channels.
They seem to think that if they make themselves as tame as possible that ofcunt will leave them alone and people will still watch.

WELL HELLO, wake the fuck up, Ofcunt doesn't give a shit about what you do.
The Babeshows should try to provide the best entertainment they can, let the fuckin' regulator decide what should be allowed.

So the olympics has just been on TV. Beach volleyball had girls in very skimpy bikini's, (not because they are forced to, but because they want to because of the heat). This is what girls want to wear at the beach, it is normal. Yet ofcunt want an adult channel to not have girls wearing bikini's on the dayshow let alone the night show.

Is this normal behaviour?
Are they protecting the public? I don't think so i think they are creating an abnormal environment for adults and children allike.

Do i think that hardcore porn is to freely available to children and it is too easily accessible, YES. Do ofcunt do anything about this, NO. It requires them to do some work.Surprised

As had been said before the babeshows are easy targets. However what future do they have if they are self regulating themselves to the extent that they are alienating their customers.
As things stand i really do fear for the future of these channels.Sad

Well done mate absolutely spot on here in what you said!! These channels need to take what you've written seriously.... A look back at old recordings compared to today is a real eye opening as to how dull and pedestrian the shows and babes are!!!


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 19-08-2016 11:59

(17-08-2016 19:36 )SecretAgent Wrote:  
(16-08-2016 19:59 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ SA have you heard anything of an intervention from Ofcom last week as reported on the chatboxes in recent days? Ofcom have reportedly told the operators not to let the cams be seen on TV on the day shows. (The shots of them have indeed lessened. )

Nothing had changed today with how Danni Levy was using the pervcam, she was not aware of any issue & the cam was clearly visible. What was different was that the laptop on which the girls can see the pervcam callers and their own image was tucked well out of sight.

Cheers for that.

Garbled communication and interpretation of the rules you mean? Wouldn't be a first would it! Tongue


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - babemaniac - 19-08-2016 17:10

I cant believe that the beautiful sweetheart Natt and the ever mesmerizing Charlie are reduced to just sitting there as if they on the bus home!! Its just an injustice to them and viewers!!! Fuck all these channels im tired of even ranting about the bullshit Important


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Mr.E Nygma - 21-08-2016 10:34

Hope today is better. I have to say I think yesterday was one of the worst days in bs daytime's history. Charlie, Alexa and Vicki just sat there for their entire stints, with just from the shoulders up visable, barely moving. At least Tanya brought a little something to the table (her sexy nylon feet on top of it in the literal sense for parts of her show) but then was constantly on and off between adverts for her evening stint. And I mean like a lot of on and off. Not to mention no show from a lads lounge babe at all yesterday. The step forward that perve cam should be is in reality a hundred steps back for the quality of the shows.


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Mr.E Nygma - 21-08-2016 13:38

Amanda and Terrie have already cheered my mood up considerably!


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Rob169 - 21-08-2016 13:40

gonna be a naughty 1 today both Amanda and lizzie are not shy also Amanda seems to have a toy with her Cool


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Rogergilford54 - 21-08-2016 15:16

What perv cam seems to be doing is forcing viewers to pay or only see the girl on screen from the neck up (outside of the odd half hour) might just as well go on the web permently (adult work & the like) daytime babe TV's days must be numbered if this carries on


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Rob169 - 21-08-2016 15:42

if your watching on web you can see a whole lot more than just from neck up without paying for perv cam Tongue


RE: Babestation Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Rogergilford54 - 21-08-2016 17:07

Rob169 webs same as TV without the on screen ads