(02-05-2010 13:16 )MARCCE Wrote:  

(01-05-2010 21:42 )gunflash10 Wrote:  Can i just throw a little more of my tuppence worth into this thread by saying that taking off knickers and showing something has happened years ago and was more explicit and if you check out some of the videos on this forum such as those with dani o neal you will see that she did a phone in show with no knickers on and pussy clearly visible at numerous times.
In an encrypted show i would expect the very minimum to be something like the above and without any hindrance or covering up by the use of clever camera angles and other techniques.The old sport xxx encrypted shows of a few years back were much more explicit than this offering from red hot and i for one would not pay nearly six quid to view it.

We're not talking about what happened years ago. Ofcom have tightened up since then.

The claim being made was that some people on here feel they paid money to see nothing more than is currently available on the babe channels

On the current babe channels there has been no full frontal nudity for at least 3 years. There has been no sign of even a toy for about the same time.

Sure, people can have their opinions as to how far they expected this show to go but for people to say it was no harder than a normal night on the babeshows is wrong.

(02-05-2010 17:48 )gunflash10 Wrote:  Your post is factually incorrect marcce since if you care to check this forum there has been full frontal nudity and sport xxx babes is one example of this.There is a more mature lady called hazel may on that channel who has shown all on recent shows and this has never been challenged by ofcom and this was in a non encrypted show.
So before you post your next reply check out all the facts so that you can back up your argument.
Also i would doubt your three year timescale as im fairly sure that i watched more explicit shows less than three years ago and i doubt if shows such as tvx call girls and sex talk live finished three years ago.

(02-05-2010 18:47 )gunflash10 Wrote:  You stated that no full frontal nudity was shown in the past three years i made no mention of hair or no hair being shown nor did you in your refuting thread to debase my earlier post.
Now in case its not sinking in you were wrong on that point and the three year timescale so in simple terms if that is not factually incorrect then where am i missing the point? you stated what you thought to be correct facts i pointed out that these were in fact not correct so your last post does not hold up in the full analysis of all facts that were previously mentioned.

(03-05-2010 15:20 )RRROGER Wrote:  Must have been a damn good show;........more posts about 2 hours of Roxy & Bonnie than for 3 hours of Danica on Elite!!!!!!!!!!

(03-05-2010 18:34 )Jay39 Wrote:  It cant have been that good as it seems Red Hot don't have it scheduled for next Friday, I've just checked on sky!

(03-05-2010 19:23 )Chico Wrote:  I'm going to be blunt - enough of the chitter chatter and lets see some vids of Bonnie Lee's minge!