The UK Babe Channels Forum
Newcomer of the year (Grand Final) - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Babe Polls & Surveys (/forumdisplay.php?fid=410)
+---- Thread: Newcomer of the year (Grand Final) (/showthread.php?tid=51750)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - Matt77 - 09-12-2012 00:14

Does it really matter?

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - Charlemagne - 09-12-2012 00:18

(08-12-2012 23:37 )Count Spankula Wrote:  Does posting for the first time automatically make someone dubious? Remember that 81% of members are still to make their first post.

And the other 19% are trying to sell you viagra Rolleyes

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - Rammyrascal - 09-12-2012 00:43

i think best solution is let these 3 apparent dodgy votes count and offset them by giving 3 to the other babe and carry on the vote for another day or 2 to decide the winner

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - mr williams - 09-12-2012 00:50

(09-12-2012 00:18 )Charlemagne Wrote:  And the other 19% are trying to sell you viagra Rolleyes

mrs w nominated one of them for "Poster of the Year"

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - trevor format - 09-12-2012 12:59

(09-12-2012 00:43 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  let these 3 apparent dodgy votes count

What proof have you got the votes are dodgy?

Nobody said the competition was only open to those who had posted in the forum before. If 80.81% of the members are ineligible to vote it should have been stated at the outset.

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - Rammyrascal - 09-12-2012 13:03

i never said the votes were dodgy. other people have. i just was suggesting a solution to this thats all

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - admiral decker - 09-12-2012 13:15

winsaw said that all he ever wanted was a fair vote, but also says that as the person running it he has the right to discount any votes he wishes. Huh

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - Chef 34 - 09-12-2012 13:18

The 3 Votes that were Supposed to Be Dodgy should be Allowed to Stand if Winsaw Didnt want them to Stand He Should have Taken them out of the Equation Straight Away and Not wait until Voting had Closed,Also How Comes Winsaw Didnt Vote Until after Voting had Closed it all sounds a bit Dodgy Really and has IMO Damaged this Forums Credibility,Im a Big Fan of Both Jodie and Olivia but the Result was that Jodie Won and that should Stand.

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - admiral decker - 09-12-2012 13:24

(09-12-2012 13:18 )Chef 34 Wrote:  if Winsaw Didnt want them to Stand He Should have Taken them out of the Equation Straight Away and Not wait until Voting had Closed,

Exactly dear fellow. I made this point in post #75 above. Since winsaw allowed the votes to stand they shoud have been counted.

RE: Newcomer of the year (*Grand Final*) - gazfc - 09-12-2012 14:35

Anyone know as to why Olivia's thread now has 'newcomer of the year' in its title??

And as the original announcement thread is back http://babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=51908 I'm guessing this farce is gonna be allowed to stand Huh