![]() |
England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114) +---- Forum: Sports Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=77) +----- Forum: Cricket (/forumdisplay.php?fid=215) +----- Thread: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 (/showthread.php?tid=60354) |
RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - lovebabes56 - 15-06-2014 08:13 Looks like there is only going to be one result possible RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - Billy_Nomates - 15-06-2014 12:16 ^^^^^^^^^^ A draw. England find themselves being presented with an age old problem, namely, the inability to find a worthy test match spin bowler. Moeen Ali is currently the main spinner - but surely he's predominately a batsmen who is an occasional spin bowler? RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - Charlemagne - 15-06-2014 13:25 Sri Lanka finally all out for 453. England are chasing quick runs and are 27-0 at lunch.. 149 ahead. I wonder where the forum's cricket correspondent has gone. A Yorkie get a double hundred and he fails to comment ![]() RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - straw man - 16-06-2014 10:38 I'm assuming that England will declare overnight and set Sri Lanka 390 to win, as they are 267/8 with Ballance 104 not out, reaching his century in the final over of the day. But could England have declared earlier? RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - Charlemagne - 16-06-2014 10:47 Cooke obviously thinks that getting Balance a hundred is far more important than winning the match.. He should have 30 mins at the Sri Lankan openers last night RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - Charlemagne - 16-06-2014 22:33 Sri Lanka down to their last wicket pair at the close of play... ![]() How Cooke must have wished that he'd declared and had the Sri Lankans batting last night.. RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - straw man - 17-06-2014 01:28 A very dramatic end to the match as England thought they had won, only to see Sri Lanka's last man signal for a DRS review. After seeing what happened there, how can anyone not see the value of the DRS? RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - Billy_Nomates - 17-06-2014 14:36 ^^^^^^ Without the use of DRS England would have won - albeit controversially. As usual on the last session of the last day of the five day test match a sparse crowd in attendance watched a very close finish. RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - jimmyt73 - 17-06-2014 21:35 I know they didnt win,but for a newly revamped team they did ok,maybe Cook should have declared earlier but on what was a fairly flat pitch which offered very little seam movement and no specialist spinner they did well to get 19 wickets in the match,also good to see Root get a double century,Ballance getting a century which gave England a shot at winning the game in the first place,im now looking forward to Friday when hopefully they can take the positives from this game and win the series. RE: England vs Sri Lanka 2014 - aussie carl - 19-06-2014 14:50 I think Cook's declaration was OK. Giving Sri Lanka half an hour's batting on the 4th day would have meant giving them a reachable target. The real problem was that in a match which went down to the last ball there were 17 overs left unbowled due to slow over rates. |