Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 |
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - sweetsugar007 - 28-11-2012 04:32 My lack activity on this forum is only exceeded by my lack of interest in these channels. I am soooooooo bored of them. I hardly watch them now and they are dying a slow death! Elite/Std66 are a shadow of what they used to be. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - gazfc - 28-11-2012 06:08 I find it quite amusing that some of you are so quick to blame the producers, you do realise the model has a choice of going naked, you say clare had a 'towel' to cover her modesty, that to me says that she wasn't comfortable getting naked(for all u know the producer could of been pushing her to go naked) RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 28-11-2012 08:38 I don't think so gaz, as she seemed surprised that they cut to the logo, and then gave the producer an angry face when he told her to pull her underwear back up. As for the towel, well it's not as if they were going to let her do the handthong, seeing as they've mostly banned it, so a small towel was the only option if she wanted to stand. I don't think the producer wanted Clare to be nude while standing, though she didn't go nude later either. It came across more as censorship than anything else, which is odd considering some of the recent sessions from other women on certain nights, and considering they let Paige and Sophia C go nude at 4:30am RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 28-11-2012 10:19 this is probably my main annoyance on the forum, forum members posting that it was a poor night unless there is nudity. what complete and total rubbish. there is more to a show/night than nudity. going naked can restrict what a babe does as they usually stay in 1 or 2 positions. for me nudity is the icing on the cake of a show from a babe not a requirement. there was several good non nudity shows last night on the shows. Kandi kay & jennifer jade on rlc along with clare richards, paige turnah, sophia lares and sophia cooke on studio66tv and the icing on the cake was the nudity from lori buckby, studio66 (sophia cooke went naked as did paige turnah) and jemma jey on storm. also ex rlc and now babestation babe lexi lowe has said going naked has killed her shows and one of her quietest nights on rlc call wise was when she went naked. regarding this clare richards non nudity incident, for me it was probably the other way round. the producers wanted clare to go naked and clare refused. i cant remember clare ever going naked on studio66. i dont think there is a leniency towards certain babes going naked either. some babes are happy going naked and some others arent also all the babechannels are a shadow of their former selves NOT JUST STUDIO66/ELITETV. does annoy me that studio66 gets this comment the most and its hardly commented on regarding the other channels RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 28-11-2012 10:59 Does anyone know if Dionne Mendez has quit the shows she now only seems to be doing silly porno shows thanks. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 28-11-2012 11:02 havent a clue bronco. she has hinted for a while she would be leaving the shows though RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 28-11-2012 11:07 Thanks Rammy RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 28-11-2012 11:34 (28-11-2012 10:19 )Rammyrascal Wrote: this is probably my main annoyance on the forum, forum members posting that it was a poor night unless there is nudity. what complete and total rubbish. I's not rubbish for the people that like to see naked girls Rammy and thats all that matters to them, in their eyes a lot of naked flesh being shown around the channels is a good night, girls not going naked and doing the more clothed style of performance is to some people boring, so telling people forum members what they post is rubbish when they post about how bad shows are when the girls wear more clothes is totally wrong imo , people have different perceptions of what is a good or bad night depending on what does or doesn't do it for them, the same can be said for people that say its a bad night when the girls wear a lot of clothes, some people think it is a good night and it is in their eyes and that's all that matters , you should realise your views are not the same as other peoples, there is no hard or fast rule as to whether a night is good or bad, people just have differing tastes . Talking about STD 66, maybe if they concentrated more on their own channels instead of watching and recording their rivals in the studio then their own shows may be of a better standard . RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 28-11-2012 11:39 66 is usually rubbish except for Fernanda they never use new sets and most of the girls look asleep. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 28-11-2012 11:59 I personally don't believe a babe, in this climate, would be pushed into going naked if she didn't want to. Had a feeling Clare was building up to something, as she's been getting even more daring lately with smaller thongs, and teasing pantie pulling. Sorry to hear the big moment was ruined. |