+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 14-11-2011 22:03
It would be interesting to know if Ofcom make any attempt to confirm the identify of complainants, or if their regime is a charter for vindictive complaints, nutters and trade complaints.
It would also be interesting to know if complaints come in bundles or dribs and drabs, and how seriously Ofcom take bundled complaints. A rival broadcaster might be tempted to hold on to a lot of supposed breaches, letting a channel demonstrate "repeat breaches" rather than submit each one as it happens and tip off the channel. An ordinary person who was genuinely offended would also be tempted to put pen to paper straight away.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 14-11-2011 22:10
......................and all the while, we sit here and wonder what are they actually achieving by all this censorship.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 14-11-2011 22:15
(14-11-2011 22:10 )blackjaques Wrote: ......................and all the while, we sit here and wonder what are they actually achieving by all this censorship.
Answer " F**K all mate.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 14-11-2011 22:24
Ofcom are a representation of what you could call the British stiff upper lip, also to answer continentals question, politician's are the dirtist scumfucks going, they are constantly embroiled in sex scandals and many are known to frequent a Gentlemans club on a regular basis, the thing is with this unhealthy obsession aswell as cheating on their spouses they really don't want us to know they are actually enjoying themselves with the amount of strip clubs and shagging they are getting up to and the same goes for Ofcom, deep down they too are not the prudes they would have us believe, it's all just down to perception and how they want the Great British public to see them, they are the masters of deception and can manipulate and fabricate all this bullshit they champion about morals and standards, but when you look at them they are the lowest form of decency and masters of feeding us this great lie of theirs whilst their propaganda bandwagon rolls on in a quest to destroy our beloved babe channels which are a true reflection on British society and not the one which Ofcom are trying to have us believe in.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 14-11-2011 22:44
Scottishbloke you're right matey, as you've mentioned in your post its all down to perception they want to portray themselves as the saviour of the moral standards, what a load of Bollocks. Mmmh i wonder how many of the Ofcom Scumbags when the clock strikes 5.30pm,how many make there way up the West End heading to some Gentlemans clubs, and then calling there wives and girlfriends saying that there stuck in traffic.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 15-11-2011 02:58
Theres a row brewing about how the Levenson Inquiry into newspaper ethics lacks tabloid representation. Free regional newspapers with missing cat stories yes, paid for tabloids that manage a balancing act between sales and the courts, no.
The Ofcom Content Commitee and the full Ofcom Board is similar. Plenty of academics, reporters and documentaries makers, but not a single person with experience of making popular programs. These people are supposed to be representative. Instead they are grey.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 15-11-2011 23:03
Latest news is that POVs have been banned.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 15-11-2011 23:23
(15-11-2011 23:03 )eccles Wrote: Latest news is that POVs have been banned.
Where did you hear this, eccles?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 16-11-2011 11:41
(15-11-2011 23:23 )StanTheMan Wrote:(15-11-2011 23:03 )eccles Wrote: Latest news is that POVs have been banned.
Where did you hear this, eccles?
They have not been banned (yet) a couple of channels were doing them last night , BS with the Ofcom licence being 1 of them .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - broncobilly10 - 16-11-2011 11:59
What ere pov?