Statement on Bluebird TV - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237) +---- Forum: Bluebird TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=166) +---- Thread: Statement on Bluebird TV (/showthread.php?tid=22461) |
Statement on Bluebird TV - admin. - 16-07-2010 07:58 Can all forum members please note that Bluebird TV are disappointed with the rigorous nature of the debates which have previously taken place in the forum concerning Bluebird and they are of the opinion that some of the criticism to which they have been subjected has overstepped the mark into abuse. Because they feel this way, Bluebird TV has expressed a wish to be protected from any further rigorous or rough debates in the future. Accordingly, to meet with Bluebird’s wishes, the sections in the forum for Bluebird TV have been closed to posting, as given the current anti-Bluebird sentiment of many of our members this seems to be the only way to protect Bluebird TV from what they perceive to be unfair comment and criticism. The closure of this forum’s sections for Bluebird TV does not mean that Bluebird TV are now banned or barred from the forum. On the contrary, as stated above, the decision to prevent discussion on Bluebird TV in this forum has been made to accord with Bluebird’s own wishes and is therefore an amicable arrangement with which Bluebird TV fully concur. Finally, can all forum members please note that UK Babe Channels has a very good relationship with each and every one of the UK babe channels, including Bluebird TV, and it is anticipated that this will continue to be the case in the future. RE: Statement on Bluebird TV - admin. - 17-07-2010 11:54 Can forum members please note that the above statement on Bluebird TV has been amended, as many members were of the opinion that the original wording did not have the clarity that they were hoping for. As the statement has been amended in accordance with the views of the members, the new and (slightly) revised version of the statement should prove to be clearer and find more favour with forum members. |