+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+------ Forum: Kelly Bell (/forumdisplay.php?fid=39)
+------ Thread: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! (/showthread.php?tid=25571)
Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - TheAvenger125 - 21-10-2010 21:33
I know the title of the thread sounds strange, but I really believe it. On Tuesday I saw one of the sexiest performances ever (even better than most night girls). Kelly was in a league of 1 and what made it great was she was breaking the rules. If she does nights she is expected to get her kit off, the point being sometimes it is far sexier to get a flash than get nothing but flashes (Danica on Elite now has exactly this problem!). Finally there is the saying 'you can have too much of a good thing' - my worry about Kelly is exactly that.
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - here4fun - 21-10-2010 21:53
bit of a strange thread lol
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - prince henry sinclair - 21-10-2010 21:59
(21-10-2010 21:33 )TheAvenger125 Wrote: there is the saying 'you can have too much of a good thing' - my worry about Kelly is exactly that.
Is it possible to have too much of Kelly Bell?
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - Chilly - 21-10-2010 22:06
(21-10-2010 21:33 )TheAvenger125 Wrote: I know the title of the thread sounds strange, but I really believe it. On Tuesday I saw one of the sexiest performances ever (even better than most night girls). Kelly was in a league of 1 and what made it great was she was breaking the rules. If she does nights she is expected to get her kit off, the point being sometimes it is far sexier to get a flash than get nothing but flashes (Danica on Elite now has exactly this problem!). Finally there is the saying 'you can have too much of a good thing' - my worry about Kelly is exactly that.
Danica really doesn't have that problem now.
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - TheAvenger125 - 21-10-2010 23:33
Don't get me wrong Kelly is a godess, but how many day girls have gone on nights and have then not been quite as sexy? If Kelly went on and then started breaking night rules as well :-P! But would she?
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - Krill Liberator - 22-10-2010 00:07
Yeah, Kelly is pretty fearless and brazen... do we think that maybe she has a better chance of getting away with such 'slips' and rule breakage during the day? Maybe the watchdogs aren't paying such close attention until the night shows?
Oh, man - sometimes I wonder if I even listen to myself when I talk; that is so clearly a heap of bollocks! Or is it?
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - rover - 22-10-2010 00:21
If Kelly was on on a regular basis then l might agree with you Theavenger but l think she was only going to do it occasionally maybe once a month! then it would be a nice treat to look forward too.
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - Ro1982 - 22-10-2010 12:12
True rover. Plus the sight of her in just a thong would be mindblowing dieing for her to do a nightshow myself
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - Scotsman - 24-10-2010 18:42
I hear what you're saying and agree to an extent. I'd hate for Kelly to become a regular on the night shows and get lost in the crowd of night babes flashing everything and talking filth. Well, as much as Kelly can be lost in any crowd! I'm content for her to be on the day shows strutting her amazing stuff in the way that only she knows how but the prospect of the odd special appearance on nights is too titilating to resist!
I've had so many hot filthy daytime calls with Kelly that I'd love the opportunity just once to go all out with her on nights and see what happens but yeah, I'd rather it was once every couple of months rather than once a week or whatever.
RE: Why Kelly shouldn't do nights! - SOCATOA - 24-10-2010 19:07
A few night shows with the gorgeous Kelly would be fine
