+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? (/showthread.php?tid=32091)
Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - StanTheMan - 12-05-2011 16:25
The way I see it, they are, because fanboys are more interested in talking to 'their' girls about the weather and holiday destinations, instead of getting them to perform. I also think it's safe to say that fanboys go to make up most of the regular callers.
I appreciate that what a caller talks about when they phone in is entirely up to them, but it doesn't take away from the fact that they are, in my opinion, partly responsible for the lack lustre shows we have nowadays.
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - Captain Vimes - 12-05-2011 16:38
Reede Fox's recipe for Bouillabaisse is fantastic. You can fuck your cookery shows. That's where I go for my culinary expertise.
In answer to your question.
I predict some posters will say yes they are to blame.
I also predict some posters will say they are not to blame.
I also also predict that you will think I'm a tw@t, Stan.
Heh, such is life.
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - chrislatimer - 12-05-2011 16:39
This is the most idiotic thread on this forum in my honest opinion, first its ofcoms fault now its the fanboys fault next it will be the guy who turns the cameras on , then maybe it will be the guy who brings the sandwiches.
get a fucking grip stan, the shows are just in a funk to due to the channel bosses being over cautious due to ofcom. they could get a little more risque but they dont wanna chance it.
fanboys have no blame in this whatsoever
also 2 more factors are a few of the girls are disinterested and thus dont even try any more. and with some channels a guy watches on tv sees 23 thousand on screen graphics and decides whats the point i wont be able to see half of the girl anyway if i ask her to get into certain positions.
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - StanTheMan - 12-05-2011 16:42
(12-05-2011 16:38 )Captain Vimes Wrote: I also also predict that you will think I'm a tw@t, Stan.
I don't think that at all, Captain, or understand why you would think such a thing.
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - broncobilly10 - 12-05-2011 16:50
Which ladies do we think are not trying anymore? There are some I am sure
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - Captain Vimes - 12-05-2011 16:52
(12-05-2011 16:50 )Broncobilly Wrote: Which ladies do we think are not trying anymore? There are some I am sure
My girlfriend, the cow.
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - iloveMegan - 12-05-2011 17:32
I see what you're saying Stan, but there have always been fanboys calling the channels. Why would it only be recently that all the girls (as all the channels are much tamer than they used to be) got together and decided "We'll still get the diehards calling even if we stop making an effort"?
Also, as one of those sad mugs who actually calls the channels, some of the most common questions I overhear are "Can you bend over/flash/spread your legs/move in the slightest?" and most are answered with ""I'm not allowed to do that".
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - StanTheMan - 12-05-2011 17:41
(12-05-2011 17:32 )iloveMegan Wrote: I see what you're saying Stan, but there have always been fanboys calling the channels. Why would it only be recently that all the girls (as all the channels are much tamer than they used to be) got together and decided "We'll still get the diehards calling even if we stop making an effort"?
Also, as one of those sad mugs who actually calls the channels, some of the most common questions I overhear are "Can you bend over/flash/spread your legs/move in the slightest?" and most are answered with ""I'm not allowed to do that".
It's easy to stereotype fanboys, iloveMegan, and I'm guilty as the next man for doing so. But I appreciate now that 'sad mugs' is a little unfair. It's your money and you can do with it as you wish. You're right about the fanboys always having been there, I suppose.
This is a stupid thread that I didn't think through and I wish I'd never created it now
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - Captain Vimes - 12-05-2011 17:45
(12-05-2011 17:32 )iloveMegan Wrote: Also, as one of those sad mugs who actually calls the channels, some of the most common questions I overhear are "Can you bend over/flash/spread your legs/move in the slightest?" and most are answered with ""I'm not allowed to do that".
That's not what they say to me.
** Smoothes eyebrow, smokes cigar and walks away with smug look on his face.
(12-05-2011 17:41 )StanTheMan Wrote: This is a stupid thread that I didn't think through and I wish I'd never created it now
What are you mad Man?
And miss my devastating contributions.
RE: Are the fanboys partly responsible for the state of the babeshows? - gazfc - 12-05-2011 17:51
So now you complain about the people who are paying for your wank/moan about material, just shocking.
What's next?