+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Calling The Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=409)
+---- Thread: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels (/showthread.php?tid=75462)
Pages: 1 2
POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - ShandyHand - 02-12-2018 09:48
This poll asks you to consider how you watch/interact with the babes. Particularly how you dwell on some, when something about them or the style of the presentation holds you on their channel or stream, while others are quickly passed over with your remote/mouse.
Specifically, the poll has two purposes:
1. To ask you to comment below on what it is within these presentations that makes you move to the next babe when you see it. The prime area of concern pertains to a babe you might normally watch or interact with, but something you dislike prompts your action on this given day.
2. To ask you to consider how often you switch over or switch off for these onscreen reasons. How many of those times are as a direct result of something or a lack of something onscreen as opposed to something external (something outside of the shows' control, in RL, takes or needs your attention). The poll itself asks you to estimate what portion of your interactivity with a given channel is curtailed as a direct result of the specifics of onscreen presentation (babe or operator inspired action or inaction in effect) as a rough percentage.
Despite any negative connotations, my aim is only to try to be constructive in accessing the strength and dispositon of the factors behind guys sticking with or leaving a babe's channel.
After all, any babe is on a hiding to nothing in her quest to garner interaction if she is remiss in the things that hold guys to a feed, is doing things that drive them away, or is scuppered by poor onscreen support.
(Major limit of this assessment: Not all punters are created equal. No doubt insiders give more weight to guy's opinions/preferences based on how much they spend with the channels. From their pov this is valid. But short of asking guys how much they spend on the channels this is the best we can get on here and hopefully will remain of value in quantifying areas of broad turn offs from a fair catchment base of users.)
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - ShandyHand - 02-12-2018 09:59
I'm a cammer only so all mine are visuals orientated...
Days
--------
Two babes on one set.
An almost non-moving babe.
An outfit that is in no way suited to any kind of teasing skin reveal.
Consistent/unnecessary use of tit tape.
Tights.
Consistent mobile phone use.
Consistent lack of eye contact with the main camera.
A babe that looks grouchy for a long period of time.
Repeatedly poor/censoring camera angles.
Too much foot fetish focus.
Nights
----------
Two babes on one set (not interacting with each other i.e. EXCLUDING the old 2-4-1s)
An overweening focus on pervcam and laptop.
A lack of camera movement.
An unenergetic or unvaried range of pose and positioning; a poor use of set.
An OTT overly dressed up outfit that too much of which is going to remain in place.
Double panties.
A repeatedly obvious sense that all 'decent' camera angles/poses are being avoided.
A babe that talks persistently or for long periods to the crew.
Domination fetish sessions.
If guys are interested enough I will compile all the answers posted to this question into a poll of their own to better see a strength of feeling on each. I say this because I know there is always a temptation on these thing to only post additional factors that one feels has been missed rather than one's own full list.
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - Rake - 02-12-2018 10:40
Turn offs/overs for me are very similar to yours Shandy:
Top turn offs/turn over provokers in a rough descending order
Tit tape
tights
no movement by babe
no main cam eye-contact
on mobile
Tit tape
talking to crew for more than required for receiving professional briefings
foot fetish caller directing the show
Tights
S&M/Dom get ups
"Quality Street" purple dresses and leggings
Rude charmless presenters who are up their own arses
Did I say Tit tape?
Did I say tights?
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - lovebabes56 - 02-12-2018 10:43
pretty much agree with evrything you stated mate but for both arguments you shouid have spilt your lists into pros and cons : -
M feel I am more of a daytime viewer than night time mate, so will leave
the arguments for night time to those who do stay up late!!
Days
Babe's outfit not allowing teasing
Set not allowing better interaction
An almost non-moving babe.
Consistent/unnecessary use of tit tape.
Music when viewing too loud
Consistent phone waving
Consistent lack of eye contact with the main camera.
A babe that looks grouchy/disinterested for a long period of time/consistently checking own phone
viewing timeouts and then stream not working
Too much foot fetish focus.
No shout out at end if you had a good call and chat
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - KerrAvon - 02-12-2018 11:36
My turnoffs already mostly covered, this applies to nights as I rarely watch daytime.
Babe just not physically attractive enough to me.
Bored or detached look on her face.
No eye contact.
No spontaneity in movement or postions, so taking up next to no or same old limited positions.
Poor camerawork, especially blatantly cutting off areas of interest.
No variety in outfits, e.g. you just know what Lynda Leigh is going to wear.
More interested in what's behind the camera than the caller/viewer.
Doms nights although I don't mind some of the sexier outfits.
Double panties.
Two or more on a bed if they're not physically interacting.
A confirmed scammer.
I won't include lack of variety in sets. It don't help but the best babes can work around and get the most out of it, if they are WILLING to do.
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - ShandyHand - 02-12-2018 11:44
^ Thank you all for your considered thoughts.
Rake's is a very good point about the babe's personality. That comes through even in chat boxes of course and through outside sources - predominately social media these days. Callers create a vibe about those good and bad in that area via these pages also.
The operators put out so little material in attempt to improve guys' ideas of who their babes are. It's all call and find out. But not everyone is into that. Your audience is broader than that. Your customer requires more info about everything connected with the shows. As attested by this forum. He wants to make knowledgable and informed choices. Not to be hoodwinked. He wants a better industry.
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - circles_o_o_o - 02-12-2018 12:37
I have to say I'm baffled by the poll. What other reason can there be other than what is on-screen? Reasons like "because someone was at the front door" or "because it was teatime", are irrelevant to helping the channels improve their fare.
84.236749 %
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - GMach1 - 02-12-2018 12:58
FWIW Here are my top bugbears:
Tights
Excessive amounts of tattoos-although I have learnt to look past that but too many is a major turnoff
Piercings esp of nipples-can't see the point of it(maybe I am too much of a bluff old traditionalist)
Girls looking over the camera and not at it to you.
Ranting on the microphone, sounding incoherent through too much excitement, OR just yakking too long, too often.
Creative inertia-i.e. not moving at all-I don't consider waggling your arse as movement as Ashley Emma used to do.
Same outfit-surely these girls borrow from each other and could find something a bit more exciting for a second night?
Black ALL the time-colours make for more interesting sessions I feel
Bare feet-yes I understand there are men out there who have a foot fetish but I personally don't get the erotism of a flat bony object with five protruding things on the end-but hey ho, each to their own
Girls who look bored and waggle the phone constantly-well you wanted to do, so you have to be prepared for the odd lax night love.
Over-use of the phrase 'shout out' doesn't anyone say hello anymore?
What would make me turn over? Lack of movement.
On whole I rarely turn the whole thing off but sometimes I do if I want to watch a film and then come back-of course in the earlier days I missed some very good action like PoV's but those are rare nowadays and now blurred online.
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - ShandyHand - 02-12-2018 13:08
(02-12-2018 12:37 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: I have to say I'm baffled by the poll. What other reason can there be other than what is on-screen? Reasons like "because someone was at the front door" or "because it was teatime", are irrelevant to helping the channels improve their fare.
84.236749 %
The stat part of this can only ever be a broad one I agree. It offers each guy a chance to estimate an opinion to provide context that is all. The babe sees guys IPs leaving her stream constantly every day all day; some will come back, some wil not. How much is down to her, how much is down to the operator, how much is unaviodable to either. How much should they dismiss the departures as the latter? How much should each one matter? How much consideration should be given to the answers here?
Obviously I'm not expecting precision that's why the options are ballpark. But I think 85% could be a valid answer if a guy thinks 'yeah 17 out of 20 times the channels could have done something about that'.
I realise these are all very unscientific measures, and believe me I considered omiting that part quite seriously, but it does require relevant consideration I think based on what the babe might percieve from her laptop each session. (So many of the polls we see in the news jusitifying this that and the other are pontentially biased opinion based ones don't forget.)
RE: POLL: Onscreen Inspirations for Changing Channels - Snooks - 02-12-2018 13:41
The blatant on screen list of turn offs
Double babe stints
Bed sets (except on Xpanded because that is pretty much all they have)
Stockings or tights on some babes that don't suit them
Endless going on mic to plug call modes such as listen in lines and 2 minute challenges and 2 minute countdown clocks. The sexual feeling is compromised
Lack of eye contact connection and sexual intensity through the gaze to camera
Lack of variety of outfit both in terms of style and colour
Lack of position and pose
Lack of a visual stimulus plan B, i.e some babes seem like one trick ponies in terms of how they move and the energy levels do not vary enough. It is too repetitious and formulaic
Obvious and endless twatting around with folk behind the scenes
Interventions of Mr F@cking P
Wiggling of phone even when the babe has loads of calls in the queue but trying to make viewers believe there are no or very few callers in the queue
Too many tats (personal taste issue I know) not my cup of tea - sorry
Overly frenzied body language
Lazy, bored body language
Lazy/non existent/static/unimaginative camerawork that stifles sensuality, eroticism and sexual tension
As per the above the ever increasing prominence of pervcam and blurredvision
Lack of spontaneity, too many stints are process and gimmick driven
Endless lying down on platform sets
Frustration at lack of set variety UNLESS the babe is actually doing something to negate it in terms of body language, movement, use of prop etc (eg oil)
Top half shots only viewing especially in the shower (back to bloody pervcam again)