+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 DAYTIME GENERAL FORUM (/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+----- Thread: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews (/showthread.php?tid=76049)
Pages: 1 2
The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - Rake - 20-01-2019 10:00
It seems to me to be a good moment now, a few months after the OnlyFans purge, to take stock of how the new babes are settling in and performing.
Now I hesitated to do this exercise, and then to post it, because it is almost taboo to say anything that might be perceived as being even slightly negative about a babe on this forum. Inevitably, when reviewing, there's bound to be the good and the less good remarks, unless you are the sort of car magazine reviewer who doesn't want to lose the free Porsche allocation...
Anyway, I have tried to keep it polite and professional, but this is a performing art and inherently personal qualities are central to success and failure...so bear with me please!
Inevitably I will have missed out some performers (says something about the babe in itself, I'd say), and perhaps added others that you might not consider 'new intake'. Again, apologies I advance if there are glaring omissions or inappropriate additions.
Heather Kay - Amazonian looks and an impact to match. A natural babeshow performer, Heather started explosively on her debut, stuttered slightly for a month or 2, but has now found her feet again and is an established top performer at the top of the second tier on 66 with historic giants of the shows like Macy, Emma C, Rebecca K etc. (but behind the Mega-Babe league-of-their-own Barca/Real Madrid pairing of Fern and Evelyn). Can she break the duopoly at the very summit of 66 and tease her way into the Fern/Evelyn echelon?
Taylor Her debut interested me so much that I started her thread - that says a lot. The geeky sexiness was initially a welcome departure from the world of identikit bleach-blondes, tans and tats. I think she has found a certain niche and is developing her own specialised market, but I have't seen her develop or really kick on. Her performances are a little wooden owing to a constricted affect and a lack of new repertoire to her poses and outfits. Needs to smile and vary things a little, without losing her niche appeal. Destined to inhabit the 3rd and 4th tiers and doomed to getting reserve shifts depending on her stats and how big and loyal her niche fanbase is I guess. At risk of dropping out altogether?
Sophie Reade instant success due to her fame, looks, figure and sunny smile. Duck to water babeshow performer in many respects, and immediately firmly into the second tier on 66 with Heather/Macy/Emma/Rebecca, taking up the vacant places left by the ageing OnlyFans refugees. I'd recommend that she moves more and relaxes her posing which suffers from being be a little too statuesque, and loosens up the rictus smile so reminiscent of a synchronised swimmer. The sky is the limit one feels with Sophie if she works on the performance. Will certainly rock the shows for years to come.
Alexis Reed Blonde and good looking in a "Texan" sort of way, she has a natural advantage, but I have never been able to watch for longer than about 6-9 minutes. A tad dull and her outfits are either too conservative or plain inelegant. Will be a solid top of 3rd tier babe but needs to work harder on performance to break into the second tier. Not sure she has the mentality to break into it and claim a secure place.
Chloe Ayling Notoriety and looks were a springboard for potential success but in danger of fading away as another also-ran blonde. Question marks remain about mentality and work ethic? Make or break period for her now on 66. Not sure we will be watching her here in a year's time.
Imogen K looks like she will be a reserve, getting rare graveyard shifts from her berth deep in the 3rd tier.
Sophia Gray a much needed mixed-race babe to compliment Sophia Lares and break the monotony of caucasian performers. Her shyness, conservative outfits and lack of confidence mean she is presently confined to be a resident of the 3rd tier of babes, but I really hope she builds on a solid start and kicks on. A second-tier berth beckons this beauty is she raises her game.
Jamie Jones just can't make up my mind about Jamie. Changes every time I see her and even when viewing her, like that optical illusion picture. Third tier performer at present, early days though and the jury is still out on this babe.
Izunia Not new to the shows but very new to 66, and again too early to give and in-depth analysis, but early impressions are fairly positive. Can sometimes rock a Minor Bond Girl from the villain's gang look, but too often just looks like a domestic help and another who tends to be a little wooden perhaps. 3rd tier reserve unless she gets the wardrobe right and hones her performance for the camera.
Bella Nicole yet another who only smiles once in a blue moon and has a constricted affect, and a restricted pose and wardrobe repertoire. 3rd tier shift-filler at best.
Lilly Emilia Eighteen pages of chat caps and vids tell you this babe is popular but I must admit I am not a fanboy. Redolent of another famous Bond character but not a flattering one I am afraid, the less said the better. Top half of the 3rd tier but lacks the charisma to join Heather's gang up in the dizzy heights of the 2nd.
Charlotte de Medici Black girl with potential but sank without trace after a couple of shifts in early December. Guess she decided it wasn't the industry for her.
Gigi Petite An instant and huge success largely due to her outrageous first few shifts before the producers caught up with her. Another natural performer on the babeshows. Top of the second tier, and a fan-favourite. Has sexy, dirty MILF appeal in spades. Very accomplished cam performer indeed both during TV feeds and backstage. Breast enlargement received rapturously by her army of fans, I seem to be the only person on earth who preferred her perfect MILFy little originals. A few rumblings of discontent about the relentless office set use and lack of tease for the traditional callers market now, but even that post-surgery rehabilitation necessity seems to be over now. At the very pinnacle of the second tier already, but in the ultimate analysis, she lacks the je ne sais quoi to cross the chasm to Evelyn and Fern's Mega-Babe group.
One thing I have noticed - there's a lot of babes now with very confusing and similar names - every possible variant of Sophia and Reed you can think of. Someone at 66 should have seen it coming and pushed for distinctive nom des plume allocation.
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - terence - 20-01-2019 10:25
(20-01-2019 10:00 )Rake Wrote: Now I hesitated to do this exercise, and then to post it, because it is almost taboo to say anything that might be perceived as being even slightly negative about a babe on this forum.
be negative till your heart's content. just don't be rude, insulting or obviously partisan and it'll be fine.
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - eddy15 - 21-01-2019 19:11
Given how much she seems to be on the phone and how busy her room is on cam it looks like lots of people have made up their mind about Jamie in a very positive way, even if you haven’t....yet
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - generator60 - 21-01-2019 19:35
<snip>
One thing I have noticed - there's a lot of babes now with very confusing and similar names - every possible variant of Sophia and Reed you can think of. Someone at 66 should have seen it coming and pushed for distinctive nom des plume allocation.
We must be due another Rose soon !
I'm quite taken with Ashlyn Shaw at the moment.
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - Charlemagne - 21-01-2019 19:53
You'll have to wait till Rake does his review of the nightshow girls before he discusses Ashley Shaw. We'll title it Rake's Progress
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - Robot Devil - 23-01-2019 09:12
Something is pretty clear, judging by your list (the conclusions of which, I largely agree with) - the influx of new talent has been underwhelming. Too many nervous, cold, predominantly uninterested girls, that need to sex up their shows and display FAR more character and allure.
We all know - sex sells! Even during day show hours. It isn't rocket science.
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - Rake - 23-01-2019 10:05
(21-01-2019 19:53 )Charlemagne Wrote: You'll have to wait till Rake does his review of the nightshow girls before he discusses Ashley Shaw. We'll title it Rake's Progress
Don't hold your breath I haven't watched a nightshow in years
But I will deffo write some more 'Rake's Reviews' every so often, so you never know
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - AndyJames - 08-02-2019 12:11
Certainly a lot of new faces currently at S66. There seems to be a new girl almost every day at the moment. Not sure if these are trial shifts but it will be interesting to see how many go on to become regulars.
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - vampire555 - 09-02-2019 00:16
Interesting summaries, thanks! You are brief on Imogen but I can confirm she is explicit on the phones, quite a throwback in fact.
RE: The 'New Intake': Rake's Reviews - Robot Devil - 04-03-2019 08:50
I think this thread would benefit from updates every couple of months - to see if there's been any progression or regression in these 'babes' (and any other new faces that have arrived subsequently) since the original post.
Some of these girls have BADLY declined, IMO.