+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Fernanda (/forumdisplay.php?fid=219)
+----- Thread: Fernanda - Studio66 - Web-Only (/showthread.php?tid=78411)
Fernanda - Studio66 - Web-Only - ShandyHand - 14-08-2019 18:32
Unfortunately, Fern is still falling awkwardly between several stools on these web onlys. In this, as I see it, she is a victim of her own previous successes on the shows, as well as punter's high expectations of her and their general reluctance to embrace change...
I wonder if she is loath go 'all out' on her web shows because a) it wouldn't be the sort of tease she is known for on days and might even diminish the 'specialness' of her night shows and b) she has the fear that so many babes seem to have of these things... that she'll be left high and dry showing all for nowt or at least very little in return. (There's also the idea that the babes need unity of approach to these web onlys atm. One or more of them stepping up to nighttime levels in terms of fta visuals would potentially pressurise other babes into showing more on them. At this time, there seems to be a concerted effort to avoid showing too much nip etc. 'just' for the price of a call.).
For someone of Fern's standing and ilk all this leaves a very tricky situation as regards making the multi-tasking, something the web onlys are supposed to thrive on, work. Fern seems reluctant to take up interesting, pervecam favourable, positions (for puss diddling, etc.) or, even better, combo angles that can be used teasingly towards main camera as well, because she remains as resolutely call focused as she ever was on TV.
So, 1. She can't do interesting enough perv sufficient to build an audience there while concentrating so much on calls; and 2. Her fear of showing too much to main holds back so many options that she ends up focusing ever more on those same calls ... a vicious circle of limitation.
Good on her though for steadfastly refusing to devalue what callers have always gotten from her in terms of main cam visuals. It would be so easy presumably to pose herself half offscreen, as so many other babes have, and try leveraging cam that way. But that would be to walk all over the standards that she has built her loyal caller base from over the years.
The visual tease for callers remains excellent and is eye catchingly above TV levels but a cammers left with the feeling it all should be so much more.
In this particular case however, it would seem it's very much us punters that need re-educating. There are now more than the traditional ways to fund great visuals. It appears, as presented atm, we're just not prepared to unite behind the lesser used ones at this point. (Again, are tip goals the answer?)
RE: Fernanda - lovebabes56 - 14-08-2019 18:37
^A great and may I say totally well written post and plenty of points of interest
RE: Fernanda - Rake - 14-08-2019 22:07
Great post Shandy.
I am not a fan of tip goals, they make shows staccato and kill spontaneity. Then of course there’s the scams that the other channel seem to be doing.
RE: Fernanda - ryuken - 14-08-2019 23:48
I can only echo the sentiments of Rake and BabeLover48, and praise you for another excellent post as always ShandyHand.
My hope is that S66 will eventually clarify exactly what we as punters can expect from each presenters web-only shows.
S66 now list the time periods that each host works on their individual page on the S66 site, be it morning, day, night and/or tease.
They need to include their levels of TV, web-only & paywall filth too, something like FTA non-topless, web-only topless, paywall nude.
RE: Fernanda - lovebabes56 - 15-08-2019 07:24
I think with Fern I would say what you see is what you get and I agree, it's good on her though for steadfastly refusing to devalue what callers have always gotten from her in terms of main cam visuals. Fern has been consistent throughout her TV, and she shows that she enjoys every minute and treats every call individually. I would agree she does fall between two stools with web only (And I guess it is not far off from when St66 will decide to go full web only if they haven't already done so) that I think Fern will probably finally feel more relaxed about the web only shows. But whatever happens, Fernanda will always want to deliver that special element to her calls & shows that she is known for, and her legendary status will always ensure that she will stick to what she knows is important to her.
RE: Fernanda - nick19888 - 15-08-2019 09:09
nice convo guys...any videos of yesterday?
it was a decent tease with nice flashes...not much more needs to be read into it imo
RE: Fernanda - Chrisst - 15-08-2019 17:12
It's no good! You can't create a new Fern
thread without me finding it, no matter how you hide it!!I was thinking about just this yesterday afternoon when I came home and found that she was web only at tea time instead of off at the cafe.
For what it's worth I think that Fernanda's
got it right and all those that hide behind the monitor or show a foot haven't. I think that its
The Fernanda Ferrari Show and so she's all there saying if it ain't broke don't fix it and showing a bit more. I thought it was thrilling, especially since it wasn't announced....like I stumbled onto something that I wasn't meant to see. Could she show more? Yes but that's the show isn't it. Always leave them wanting more.
RE: Fernanda - Wardjackson - 15-08-2019 17:44
(15-08-2019 17:12 )Chrisst Wrote: It's no good! You can't create a new FernGood post, and I tend to agree with it. Must admit, though, I enjoyed her first web only show when her nipples were out very often, and those shorts really did nothing to cover her pussy!
I was thinking about just this yesterday afternoon when I came home and found that she was web only at tea time instead of off at the cafe.
For what it's worth I think that Fernanda's
I think that its
Could she show more? Yes but that's the show isn't it. Always leave them wanting more.
RE: Fernanda - hornball - 15-08-2019 17:49
(15-08-2019 17:12 )Chrisst Wrote: It's no good! You can't create a new Fern
I was thinking about just this yesterday afternoon when I came home and found that she was web only at tea time instead of off at the cafe.
For what it's worth I think that Fernanda's
I think that its
Could she show more? Yes but that's the show isn't it. Always leave them wanting more.
Saw her on this site at one point during her shift, and - let's just say' - her dress was nowhere near where it may well should have been during the day 'loud applause for Fern'' Was that behind the scenes, or did she take the attitude ''somebody stop me if you dare''??
RE: Fernanda - lovebabes56 - 15-08-2019 18:13
I hope i made some points in my post above