Are the babes ever going to get naked on TV again?. #2.

If you remember this thread was made before , well since it has been a long time again that's why i have decided to make the thread again.

So the question is simple will the babes ever get naked on TV again.

Post what you think in the poll.

Yes, we have to have hope, we have to believe. I'd rather think positively instead of starting another thoroughly depressing discussion.

I would like to think we have to hope it will happen again,but we have to conside just how much meddling OFCOM has done over the years

Look, I'm still a babeshow fan. Even now there are a few babes doing the sort of crowd-orientated material I've always craved - and I never saw nudity as a essential to the shows in any case - quite the opposite in fact... But let's get real here: There's only one direction of travel on this subject.

Let's look at this in detail, with an eye to required broader context, and try to learn from history here: In the 15 years or so since Ofcom became their regulator not ONCE have the channels as a whole gotten harder in their visual content. (Of course, I'm speaking here of fta/TV output as per the o.p's original question.) Sin was the last hope something like that MIGHT happen. But their own incompetence killed that chance... Individual operators have offered brief periods of push back against the regulations (presumably as they felt financial need) but all eventually reverted to limiting what we see in fta. As market leader BS in particular has held fast to the idea that guys are pushed to purchasing the more expensive paywall services when the eroticism of the main cam is curtailed. The more we've accepted this, the more the screw has been turned. (The final culpability remaining ours.) So, the question is really: Why the HELL would the main channel do any different now?

Businesses are propelled forward on incentives. Incentives towards prospective profits. And for nearly 15 years now the channels have shown us - time and time again - that ALL their incentives lie AWAY from fta and, by extension, from the fta feeds having stronger content. (In addition: The babes have happily embraced the lesser public footprint the paywalled streams bring.)

You see, WE, not the operators or Ofcom, provide all the incentives to what happens with the industry. We provided the template for how the game goes on Ofcom's playing field in effect. And we, as the paying customers, have CONSISTENTLY enabled the shifts we've seen in the industry's every output. In fact, it's evident that, for over10 years, we've paid ever-increasing amounts into EVERYTHING BUT its fta material. And the guys that ARE paying thesedays (or at least paying more) have, in doing so, TOLD the operators that, to a large extent, they want it the way they have it now. If dissenting readers here - as presumably more-passive consumers of the streams - PAID larger amounts towards fta content things might be different but, largely, the market has proven it's after a more personalised and intimate (i.e. hidden from public view) form of entertainment than was the basis for the show's formative years. We need to avoid delusion over that.

Any other chances for a reversal in these trends? Well, dwindling competition in the industry only makes the bucking of trends ever more unlikely. (No operator needs to step out of line to try to find new market share when they are happy to simply mine the seams of custom they're currently exploiting.)

You'd think XP would perhaps be more unhappy with the current status quo than BS, but it would seem that even they don't need radical change enough to move away from their remarkable double panties rule!! (Was there ever a bigger sign the shows don't need the visual revelation of the babe's erogenous zones than double panties?!)

Also: No new operator has taken a chance on a declining industry in the years since Sin, so that too would seem to be a non-starter as regards likelihood of instigating the change the o.p. is looking for.

Lastly, even if - in some unlikely turn of events politically - Ofcom got kicked to the curb, BS have shown themselves more than willing to enforce a self-censorship of their outputs. And thus IT MUST BENEFIT THEM TO DO SO in the current environment. Is the removal of Ofcom enough of a change to that enviroment to make them about face? Hard to say, but remember this: They now have a SUBSCRIBER ONLY WEBSITE - i.e. behind a site-wide paywall in effect - and thus the authorities are aware that no kids have any kind of access to their streams. As such, their web content can be whatever the overall obscenity laws allow and they CHOOSE to show he same old massively censored content for the fta streams. They changed the regulatory environment their site falls under and they doubled down on their own censorious stipulations to babes. Just like they have by banning nudity to their 900 feeds.

So, to conclude: It seems more likely to me that BS will instigate a full nudity ban on its fta webstreams than that it will ever go back to nudity on TV! "Hope" is only good when based in reality. To all that wanna prove my conclusion wrong, you'll have to start by making more impactful (non-)spending than we have atm.

POLL OVER.

You see why i done this poll again was to see the difference in votes to when they was last restricted to get naked and here's that first poll you can view here https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=80170

And surprisingly NO wins by just 2 Votes and i thought NO would have way more votes then YES because that's just the vibe i am getting from it this time around i just can't see the Babes getting naked ever again.

And going back to the first time around , NO got way more votes then YES , strange that even know i said NO myself but yeah.

^ A lot of the naysaying 'freeloaders' got fed up and fucked off since the first poll? The covid period was particularly dire for the shows. They are only just recovering some IMO.