RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
^ I agree it's harder to tell than it once was.
What indications do we have? Well, in a general way, we do get to see less than ever of what is actually bringing in the money these days - much more is hidden from true general transparency. (Babes at BS are not above pretending to be on paywalled interaction when they're not in order to encourage FOMO in viewers for instance. But we're talking about 66...) At first glance a lot of their fta sessions do seem sparse of visible paid interaction atm. Particularly so in the hours directly after midnight. (But then TV seems all about profile not profit for 66 these days. Hence all the rolling ads. So likely TV can be put aside to some extent in this argument.)
I'd be asking too, what exactly can be regarded as evidence for your sustainability? What is sustaining for the individual babe for instance could be a higher bar than what is sustainable for the operator (many times small amounts per babe might cover operator costs but, for an individual babe, her fraction might not be enough to sustain her). But then enough individual babes would have to find it worthwhile over a decent period of time or else 66's roster will dwindle and their sustainability would then be under threat. Enough successes have to be maintained across time iow.
Operating in a market place of lesser viewer numbers (site membership now compelled; less TV lurkers as they're down to only one Astra channel) is undoubtedly a whole different dynamic to previously. Plus, higher numbers of incentivised shifts places the onus squarely on the babe to be profitable every time she's on the web.
Another factor is how long these multiple babes you speak can 'sustain' for each time. Being on for only a short period each shift might suggest a problem. If they can sustain longer shifts then I'd be more encouraged. A high numbering, active, roster tells us little on its own - just that everyone is trying. A high churn of babes might be more indicative.
Opening the stream viewership back up to formerly lapsed subscribers, as 66 did following the site launch, might also be regarded as suggesting they felt they needed to let these users back onboard for some reason. Had their catchment of users fallen too far before that perhaps?
In truth I'd suggest only that it's probably too early days on this new website (a marked change for everyone) to be able to call it one way or the other as yet.
Babeshow n. - Live Adult Entertainment genre based around premium-rate phome sex chat lines. Scantily-clad female presenter induces callers and users to other inactive services from three-walled set in a TV studio. Largely softcore Tease format influenced by standards and strictures of free-to-air TV platform..
(This post was last modified: 23-02-2022 22:50 by ShandyHand.)
|