lovebabes56
The No.1 Teddy Bear!!
Posts: 22,172
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 68
|
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans
If they do back down it's a victory for thr girls so good on them, but gut instinct it's more than likely S66 won't, and I reckon it would take the likes of Mikaela, Fernanda (even though she doesn't have an OF page) and possibly the two Cara girls, and possibly Rebecca threatening to quit before S66 did back down, as losing assets like theirs would be a big blow to their staying afloat and filling screen time on either TV or the web.
What a snow storm Lucy Anne has created but at least she stood up for herself.
FERRARI & LOVEBABES, - BABE CHANNELS ULTIMATE COUPLE!!
CURRENT BS BABE FAVES :- MIGHTY MIKAELA WITT, DUCHESS DARELLE OLIVER, SULTRY STORMI MACK,
ALL - TIME BABE FAVES:- FERNANDA FERARRI , MELLIE D AND MIKAELA WITT PHOENIX KNIGHT[ DENNI TAYLA, SEXY STEVIE LOUISE
'ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF LIFE" - LIFE OF BRIAN
|
|
14-10-2018 07:51 |
|
KerrAvon
Posting Machine
Posts: 7,683
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 211
|
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans
(14-10-2018 04:05 )ryuken Wrote: S66 will more than likely back down from trying to take a cut of their presenters OF earnings.
Especially if Clare Richards or Cara Brett threaten to leave and refuse to sign this new contract.
Part of me really wants to see what S66 will do if a large majority of their current hosts go to BS, XP or VN.
And they struggle to get any new, current or former presenters to join their roster because of this situation.
And if there's no room at the inn for those babes, then what? VNTV still can't give a start date, and is web based anyway. How long can some of them survive without TV exposure keeping them more relevant than thousands of models/cammers out there? They've got a lifestyle to maintain lol.
Time has shown that big babes leaving a channel, for whatever reason, ultimately get replaced. Despite the decline in the industry, the channels still seem to be making new stars. Punters will just gravitate to them.
S66 management have taken their eyes off the ball for too long, OF the latest. Instead of starting up their own version like BS, they startup a pointless magazine with parties. Hell the babes probably even shot OF material for themselves while S66 flew them all over the place on their shoots for free .
Maybe S66 plan their own version of OF too, who knows. But they still hold the cards I feel
(This post was last modified: 14-10-2018 08:46 by KerrAvon.)
|
|
14-10-2018 08:44 |
|
Rake
Tipping for nips and panties
Posts: 2,518
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 43
|
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans
More thoughts:
1) no one is indispensable in any organisation, even Babes...they will be replaced and life goes on and new stars born.
2) OF and other platforms are not going away any time soon - 66 and other channels need to embrace change and adapt to live with it in a mutually beneficial way. BS, while I am no fan of their conduct towards the punters, have been much more reasonable in setting up their own in house version of OF. Time will tell if it is a successful gambit.
3) These girls are self employed and of course will have a portfolio of income streams, and it’s perfectly normal for each stream to indirectly and interdependently promote one another. This happens by reputation and world of mouth and punters simply searching across platforms for more of their favourite girls. No different to plumbers lawyers, electricians and private doctors.
4) S66 don’t as i see it have any God given or even moral right to a cut of the babe’s other independent portfolio income streams - unless they say they are acting as an agent for the babe. That would be different, and require a different contract. It seems that 66 are trying to declare they are, in effect, Agents for the babes, but after the fact, in retrospect. That, unsurprisingly isn’t going to wash with the babes. An agent is supposed to find you work not leech off work you independently set up and made a success.
5) 66 might have more succes trying to cut a deal with OF as a platform-to-platform arrangement, rather than the babes as individuals. There’s got to be mutual benefits to co-promotion?
(This post was last modified: 14-10-2018 11:27 by Rake.)
|
|
14-10-2018 11:25 |
|