Petition

(21-10-2011 11:32 )shankey! Wrote:  

(21-10-2011 10:42 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  hi guys it seems to me the only way to increase support in this petition is 4 either a high profile babe from one or even several of the restricted babe channels,or a key member of one of the channels hierarchy needs to join this campaign.its seem ironic the most of the world leaders are rejoicing in the passing of a libyan dictator but when it comes to adults being able to watch what they want after 9pm in this country our govt has decided what our limits should be

i havent seen a post mentioned at all by one of the babes for months ,and if they have you can bet they have been warned not to get involved in any of it,simply because they wont rock the boat until the purse strings of the callers starts to fall short of their profit margin,if the channels were to be banned all together they would be begging us for a petition to get them back on air , ;(

I agree, i don't think things are bad enough yet for the babe channels, as you've mentioned, when the channels will start losing calls then the alarm bells will start ringing, until then is as you were, with the limp Adult entertainment.

(21-10-2011 19:48 )hatesexistofcom Wrote:  Did you know most ofcom complaints are laughed at by them and they say this in the rules somewhere..They say (ofcom) that most complaints are laughable and simply brushed under the carpet..A lot of my complaints were about Big Brother because there was only 1 complaint one week about big brothers bit on the side and that was ME. They showed male penises doing a nude conga and the presenter said "it might be a bit late to warn but please turn away if your offended by male genatalia"..So i complained and it got this wording in ofcom weekly bulletin..ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF CONTENT
and the complaint rejected.SO. channel 5 allow male penises with no warning yet female genatalia is a big NO NO..So i give channel 5 what for in an email but they dont respond anymore.Fecking sexist feckers male genatalia not even worth warning about yet female absolute no fecking way..Channel 5 you are sexist c**nts and your the one i am gunning for if i get the chance taking the mickey out of me..

You have my vote

Sadly people with closed minds arent prepared to listen or even consider other viewpoints. Proper judges would give serious consideration to alternative viewpoints.

(21-10-2011 20:19 )eccles Wrote:  Sadly people with closed minds arent prepared to listen or even consider other viewpoints. Proper judges would give serious consideration to alternative viewpoints.

I agree with you mate, i hope somehow either the government will cut Ofcoms funding, or maybe another regulator will step in. You never no

I just wanted to add this,,,i am going to post a link to an article reguarding the use of "P" on UK tv..This P means that the product placement has paid for some advertisement,,ANYHOW THAT NOT THE POINT,,the article will take about 30 seconds to read but at the beggining it states the Government allowed this P to be allowed but a bit further down it says Ofcom allowed this P to be allowed..Now this is 2 different departments its either Ofcom OR Government ,,if its Government then WHY the need for Ofcom then?????

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun...ement-logo

(21-10-2011 19:36 )hatesexistofcom Wrote:  Yes good truthfull post it seems you can do this but cant do this in the same text sort of thing..Rules are there to set borders of whats right and wrong like in a sports event..You cant really have contradictions because this then voids the rules in the first place.

we need a referee ;D

(21-10-2011 19:50 )continental19 Wrote:  I agree, i don't think things are bad enough yet for the babe channels, as you've mentioned, when the channels will start losing calls then the alarm bells will start ringing, until then is as you were, with the limp Adult entertainment.

They even showed him dead (gadaffi) and used mobile phone footage at 6pm UK time..I will see what turns up in ofcom weekly bulletin because that was bad before the watershed..Anyhow thats off topic but want to see what ofcom do if theirs acomplaint..

The only difference being is that you're not going to have a wank over the dead image of gaddafi as I really think we are losing sight of why Ofcom hate our beloved 900+ channels and what we are fighting for, plain and simple we want R18 material available to us grown up's who choose to view such material

(21-10-2011 19:53 )continental19 Wrote:  

(21-10-2011 19:48 )hatesexistofcom Wrote:  Did you know most ofcom complaints are laughed at by them and they say this in the rules somewhere..They say (ofcom) that most complaints are laughable and simply brushed under the carpet..A lot of my complaints were about Big Brother because there was only 1 complaint one week about big brothers bit on the side and that was ME. They showed male penises doing a nude conga and the presenter said "it might be a bit late to warn but please turn away if your offended by male genatalia"..So i complained and it got this wording in ofcom weekly bulletin..ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF CONTENT
and the complaint rejected.SO. channel 5 allow male penises with no warning yet female genatalia is a big NO NO..So i give channel 5 what for in an email but they dont respond anymore.Fecking sexist feckers male genatalia not even worth warning about yet female absolute no fecking way..Channel 5 you are sexist c**nts and your the one i am gunning for if i get the chance taking the mickey out of me..

You have my vote

hate to break it to you but 99% of tv is aimed at women notice how many xfactors and dancing on ice type crap there are on all looking for females to vote for some crap or other ....its money.......the fact that every 2 minutes there are gays and other assortments of perverts is just to rub in that fact that you dont count

(21-10-2011 20:27 )hatesexistofcom Wrote:  I just wanted to add this,,,i am going to post a link to an article reguarding the use of "P" on UK tv..This P means that the product placement has paid for some advertisement,,ANYHOW THAT NOT THE POINT,,the article will take about 30 seconds to read but at the beggining it states the Government allowed this P to be allowed but a bit further down it says Ofcom allowed this P to be allowed..Now this is 2 different departments its either Ofcom OR Government ,,if its Government then WHY the need for Ofcom then?????

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun...ement-logo

It was Ofcom but they probably would not have gone ahead without the nod from Government. It has been on the cards for years and was raised as an possibility when the Euro Television Without Frontiers rules were brought in. Basically its sloppy reporting by the Gruaniad. If it was a TV show any viewer would be entitled to submit a complaint and Ofcom would take 6 months to investigate Privacy & Fairness issues wasting £1000s in the process.