Is this a discussion forum or a suck-up zone?

surreysub Wrote:After reading the alleged counter-arguments I'm still not convinced. The way people were going into panic mode and damage control during the infamous "least favourite girls" thread made me realise this was mostly a forum for brown-nosing.

i cant agree here m8. i posted my list and no1 said anything against it because i gave a tactfull reply, not just spouting abuse saying this 1 is a minger end of, the guys that got derepped and shouted down showed no tact just hurled abuse, what happend to them was fair as they had been inconsidderate in there choice of words.

I see that c u nt phone perv gave me bad rep over this, i would return the favor but the c u nt aint worth it

Giving bad rep for having a different standpoint? That's a bit childish isn't it?

I left him good rep as he's a good poster and member and in general is a sound fella but read the rep i gave and you'll see my point was made

If people want to slag or kiss ass then the choice is theirs, there's nothing much to be gained by doing either as its all just a statement of personal preference on an internet forum that holds no real relevance to much, personally I don't think theres much of a problem, its not as if the admin is going around banning people for saying bad things about the girls and sure you have people that are a little over protective of their favourite girl when they are 'attacked' but what else would you expect.

shaymas Wrote:Giving bad rep for having a different standpoint? That's a bit childish isn't it?

its not having a different stand point m8, im all for people expressing themselfs, just do it with considderation to the words used.

skanky whore.
ugly bitch.

she realy didnt do it for me.
not attractive to me.

2 are directed at the girl to cause offence the second set are oppinions applyed to youself, and express your taste, so not a personal attack on the said girl...

both sets of replys mean the same thing (ie: yer dick was on fire and she has the last wet place to stick it, yet you wouldnt)just 1 set of replys is tactless and offencive

I don't really think there is a problem. If people want to brown nose let them, though I don't see any problem with people welcoming and admiring girls they like if they join the forum. Other members will still be able to have a sensible discussion about the girls. As long as we don't reach a stage where people who do have a criticism of a model are not being censored or hounded out then I think the forum is ok.

Hexit Wrote:

surreysub Wrote:After reading the alleged counter-arguments I'm still not convinced. The way people were going into panic mode and damage control during the infamous "least favourite girls" thread made me realise this was mostly a forum for brown-nosing.

i cant agree here m8. i posted my list and no1 said anything against it because i gave a tactfull reply, not just spouting abuse saying this 1 is a minger end of, the guys that got derepped and shouted down showed no tact just hurled abuse, what happend to them was fair as they had been inconsidderate in there choice of words.

Well said hexit, it's all about tact. If people show a lack of tact, one way or another it's just going to start a row. It seems that surreysub doesn't comprehend the difference between negative comments and abuse.

A Spider Monkey Wrote:I don't really think there is a problem. If people want to brown nose let them, though I don't see any problem with people welcoming and admiring girls they like if they join the forum. Other members will still be able to have a sensible discussion about the girls. As long as we don't reach a stage where people who do have a criticism of a model are not being censored or hounded out then I think the forum is ok.

Very good points A Spider Monkey.

BelfastBadBoy Wrote:I left him good rep as he's a good poster and member and in general is a sound fella but read the rep i gave and you'll see my point was made

Sorry, I meant him giving you bad rep for a different standpoint is a bit childish